Posted on 07/01/2020 11:53:22 AM PDT by Signalman
With five months until the election, things couldn’t look any worse for the president of the United States. His approval rating is down to 40%. People are getting tired of his antics and the insults he hurls at his opponents. The media is increasingly confident that, come November, the voters will elect a new chief executive.
This might sound like June 2020, but I’m actually referring to June 1948 — when President Harry Truman, a Democrat, was running to keep his job against Republican Thomas Dewey.
The similarities between the 1948 and 2020 elections are striking. Like President Trump, Truman often ruffled feathers with his salty language. At one point, Truman even described Dewey as a fascist, a term not taken lightly just three years after World War II.
Just as with Trump, the media described Truman as desperate and unhinged. They mocked him for the more than 8,000 empty chairs at a speech he gave in Nebraska — presaging the coverage of Trump’s recent speech in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Almost everyone thought Truman would lose, including the president’s mother-in-law. A Newsweek poll reported 50 out of 50 politicos predicting a Dewey victory.
But on Nov. 3, 1948, the world woke up to the stunning news that Truman had won. The experts were left struggling to make sense of how they got it so wrong.
Today, we’re seeing poll after poll showing Trump trailing former Vice President Joe Biden. In the echo chamber of cable news and social media, there’s a growing consensus that Trump is headed for humiliating defeat.
Are the pundits right, or are we moving toward another stunning win by a beleaguered incumbent? Could history be repeating itself?
The 1948 election warns us that an upset is very possible. There are two dynamics at work in 2020 that were decisive that fateful year.
The first is political staying power. Prior to 1948, the Democrats had won four straight presidential elections. Many observers assumed that they were due for a loss, especially with the GOP’s large gains in the 1946 midterm elections. The media, however, underestimated the strength of the Democrats’ New Deal coalition. While commentators were thinking in terms of political cycles and party turnover, they failed to consider the New Deal’s long-term appeal for its constituents.
Today’s pundits might be making the same mistake with Trump’s 2016 coalition. Throughout the Mueller investigation, the impeachment process, the pandemic, and record unemployment, Trump’s approval rating in the RealClearPolitics average has remained surprisingly consistent (around the mid-to-low 40s), showing that at least 4 out of 10 people support the president regardless of whatever the opposition throws up. That may not be sufficient to guarantee victory, but it’s a precious asset in a general election — especially with Democratic enthusiasm for Biden comparatively low.
The second factor is that people often vote for incumbent presidents based on certain intangibles (leadership skills or likability) despite the candidate’s perceived flaws or policy disagreements. The Washington Post alluded to this phenomenon after Truman’s victory: “The American people admire a man with courage even though they don’t always agree with him.” The voters might even give the opposing party control of Congress during the midterm elections to check that president, but they will still reelect a flawed incumbent because of their supposed charisma (see Bill Clinton and Barack Obama) or boldness (see Truman).
Like Trump, Truman was seen as a fighter who was not afraid to go against the political establishment. And like Biden, Dewey was an uninspiring candidate who, because of overconfidence, played it safe and limited his public appearances.
It is possible that in a dangerous and unpredictable world, voters will prefer a feisty and aggressive Trump over a lackluster Biden.
Despite all of this, Biden could still win in November. But if history can teach us anything, it is that the experts can get it wrong. We don’t even have to go back to 1948. Exactly four years ago (in June 2016), Hillary Clinton led Trump in the polls by 5 percentage points. The night before the election, the intelligentsia was still confidently predicting a Clinton win. The next day, Trump stunned the world.
Hell yes we are!!!
So much winning!
“People are getting tired of his antics and the insults”
Not at all. We don’t think he’s gone nearly far enough.
The opposition is extremely insultable.
"People" like the Bush-league republican and Romney-bots and assorted never-Trumpers.
Not unless he gets out of the basement where they have him tied up, gets rid of Fauci, reclaims the presidency and sets us free.
“His approval rating is down to 40%. People are getting tired of his antics and the insults he hurls at his opponents. “
Three lies/projections in one sentence.
Roll MAGA, roll!
DNC in 2016: No need for us to cheat. Just let Hillary coast to a landslide victory.
DNC in 2020: Stuff those ballot boxes! Start today!
So yeah, I’m not wildly optimistic here.
Trump is our junkyard dog. He is a mutt, ugly and filthy but no one is stealing auto parts on his watch. Grrr!
People are getting tired of antics and insults, alright, but not his. The Dems have worn out their welcome with lots of folks I know. Will they vote for President Trump? Not likely. Will they sit at home on election day? VERY likely.
Enjoy another great laugh on the pollster bsing liars! Click below and enjoy! https://www.chicagotribune.com/resizer/h2BCQVBM1bPwulBF5mvVYrZTlOA=/1200x944/top/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/DVEPX3S3BJBGVA6MR3HTLQBNKU.jpg
Just as with Trump, the media described Truman as desperate and unhinged.
—
Obviously, there’s been some sort of reversal of the poles between then and now.
I’m tired of:
1- the Deep State
2- the political class
3- crooked polls and pols
4- the eneMedia
5- George Soros
6- Nancy Pelosi
7- Adam Schiff
8- AOC and her gang of commies
9- the Commie Organization BLM
10- the Cuomo brother: dru and his other brother Fredo
11- Witch Doctor Falsi
12- COVID-19 lies
13- Radical leftist Rat governors
14- Worthless masks
15- I could go on for hours
From the article:
“With five months until the election...”
Isn’t it 4 months? Anyway, I agree with the rest of the article. Trump will win in November. Everyone knows Biden would just be a placeholder until Stacey Abrams or Kamala Harris is ready to step in.
The gas-lighting from the media is so intense that November is shrouded with an impenetrable fog. One must simply carry on in faith that a desired outcome can be reached.
I have neighbors who are "liberals" and "independents" in their political views. No possible argument or event will change those views and I doubt they will vote for Trump under any circumstances. There are way too many of them for my comfort.
It will come down to turnout by Trump supporters, over and above the margin-of-fraud sponsored by the Democrats.
Either way the election goes, I expect there will be violent opposition afterwards, and retribution against the losers.
I’m hoping a landslide...Fox ratings are through the roof and Tucker has the highest consecutive ratings in history. This SHOULD be an indicator as to what people are thinking. I know very few people that love what the blue states are doing. However, Trump is doing what he always does-—reeling them in a little then letting out a little line then “wham”!!!
The ‘New Deal’ is the cause of most of the problems we are seeing now.
While I do think Trump will win, it will not be nearly a landslide, and at best, we are looking at four more years of this. Democrats stopping Trump at every turn.
The only good in the end will be a new generation of politicians that are inspired by Trump who will replace the old, and out-of-touch GOP.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.