Posted on 05/20/2020 5:56:12 PM PDT by ransomnote
Blue screen of death
It is an anti-vaccer article. It took pretty routine results from a trial, and made it sound like a catastrophe.
For example, it says 20% had this “level 3” reaction. That is a lie. The trial had 3 dosages it tested; there were 15 people in the highest-dose cohort, and 3 of those developed level 3 reactions (fever, headache, etc) that self-resolved, meaning they didn’t need medical treatment.
One person in the lower two dosage groups also had a level 3 reaction, which was redness around the injection site, also self-resolving.
So ZERO of the people in the studies had a reaction that would be life-threatening.
The results of the lower-level dosages were fine, so they are not going to continue with the high-dose tests, it looks like they are going to switch from a 25ug to a 50ug for the ‘low dose’, and stick with 100ug for the other dosage.
If hydroxichloroquine and zinc are the cure for this disease, why are we even seeking a vaccine which will take months to test, produce and distribute? Is this the “flu shot” which is marketed with big bucks to get everyone to get it? In the last 25 years of flu shot hysteria I agreed to get the shot du jour exactly once. I came down with the flu exactly once...the same year I got the shot. I have refused to get it since and have been flu free ever since. I think the Swedes had the right idea. They are allowing their immune systems fight the disease. They are not going to have to go through the trauma of reopening their economy once the crisis has run its course.
If 99% of people recover from this virus, why is a vaccine needed?
Yeah, this is fake news.
From the opposite of the usual sources of fake news.
But the same.
Ask Gates to roll up his sleeve and take the first dose of whatever Fauci slaps together.
You shouldn’t. It’s lies and conjecture salted with small bits of truth. There are legitimate concerns with a vaccine being rushed like this one. But you won’t find them on the kook site linked above.
A much more reasoned interpretation of the press release can be found here:
Not all roses, but “catastrophe” is beyond hyperbole.
If hydroxichloroquine and zinc are the cure for this disease, why are we even seeking a vaccine which will take months to test, produce and distribute?
Because its cheap, effective and Big vaccine cant make money off it. Its time to think of this and reclassify it as a flu. No cures to protect yourself from it, but drugs that will erradicate it if you get it. The media is still trying to scare people into thinking this is poison and worse than the COVID. Its high time to purge the CDC and FDA. Thry have become poisoned by politics, and are not working to save peoples lives. They are both Obsolete!
I am having no part of a vaccine that uses dead baby parts- aborted fetuses. This vaccine could have used other common vacination developement means ( more time consuming) but no, they started with dead baby parts ( lung tissue) from the start. Evil.
I agree with you, Williams. I agree with Robert F. Kennedy’s concerns about the safety of vaccinations, but because he is so adamant in his position, he might not be as objective as we would like in interpreting these results, and could be misinterpreting the same.
We need more objective sources before reaching any conclusions.
What does concern me is Bill Gates’ statement that he wants to be indemnified for any damage done by his “vaccines”, as it has been done for all the childhood vaccines.
I would be more supportive of vaccines if Big Pharma would accept financial liability for any damage done by vaccines, and if those trying to warn about the dangers weren’t so attacked by the medical/pharmaceutical beaurocracies.
The article smells like Barbara Streisand because it was written by this kook: Robert F. Kennedy Jr
Yup, Gates’ reputation is stable - Windows is useless against viruses also.
So let me start with the safety and tolerability profile. Overall mRNA-1273 was generally safe and well tolerated with the safety profile that's consistent with what we've seen in prior Moderna infectious disease vaccines in clinical studies. One incidence of a grade 3 adverse events of erythema or redness around the injection site was reported in the 100 microgram dose cohort. But the most notable adverse events were three participants with grade 3 -- systemic grade 3 symptoms at the 250 microgram level that followed the second vaccination at that dose. We do not see any of these after the first dose and so I believe these flu-like symptoms are really an indirect measure of a strong immune response. That said, all adverse events have been transient and self resolving, no grade 4 adverse events -- no serious adverse events have been reported.
I am going to watch I Am Legend again.
Is this the ONLY place this is published? Because if this is real, it would be everywhere. Color me skeptical.
Why not gain immunity the old fashion way? No one finds it the least bit odd that they lock us down to prevent immunity, then try to force a vaccine on us to “return to normal”?
Don’t get the shot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.