Posted on 05/20/2020 11:55:18 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
Coronavirus infections could reach as high as 5.4 million in the US in the next two months and more than 290,000 Americans could die if social distancing isn't adhered to, according to a COVID-19 forecast model.
The ominous forecast from the University Of Pennsylvania's Wharton School model accounts for all states fully reopening without any social distancing measures.
In comparison, the model predicts nearly 4.3 million cases and 230,000 deaths by July 24 if states reopen but individuals maintain their social distancing efforts.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The good news....nobody will die of heart attacks, flu, strokes, cancer, etc....during that period (snark)
I’m guessing the numbers, whatever they actually are, will be the same either way. The only difference will be over how many moths they happen. That was the “flatten the curve” idea, if I’m not mistaken.
the only way to change the numbers will be a cure or vaccine to materialize.
Blah Blah Blah.
Meanwhile, France says no sign of virus rise after lockdown eased.
So who knows?
Chances are Millions of people who already had the virus, until we get solid data from Anti-Body testing we will not know for sure. This is scare mongering at it’s worse, another excuse for keeping as much shutdown as possible.
Any model will be useless at present, IMO.
GIGO.
If you don’t have reliable data to use for your model, your model will output unreliable answers.
Too many people are being labeled as dying from this virus and that makes any model mostly useless as far as accuracy is concerned.
How accurate are the tests being performed? What percentage are false positives or false negatives?
Models. Whatever.
So tell us all where a correct model has been in the past.
Be it glo bull warming or this virus, every model put forward has been intended to scare the population into doing what the modelers want us to do and the models have always been way the hell off and totally wrong.
Bull Shit on your model.
Occam’s Razor: An Ivy League school in Philadelphia handing Tom Wolf justification to continue his lockdown.
Check the political affiliations of the mofos behind this Ferguson-like erroneous model........cause these probably are the same mofos that concur with most libtards that we can’t do sh*t till we have a CURE. Yeppers, mail in voting for Presidential election incoming...OMFG!
Just because they want to set their hair on fire doesn’t mean I have to set mine on fire. Now I’m going to go outside and worship Gaia.
Wharton, Trump’s alma mater.
There’s one suddenly rich blond who didn’t lie about Hunter Biden.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, BLA, BLA, BLA so sick of this BS!! These bastards found a way to destroy the economy and they did it their absolute HATRED of Trump is far more important than OUR livelihoods or businesses and YES it did not matter the rest of the world had to be involved the end justified the means PURE EVIL!!
There’s also a famous French doctor of the late eighteenth century who invented a 100% effective headache cure and never got a complaint from a single patient. He was named Guillotine.
Boy who cried wolf, anyone?
I am an expert in statistics. I spent my whole life writing statistical software and running analysis. I came up with numerous statistical models on human behavior and I can tell you this. The models can say whatever you want them to say. Tweak the data a very small bit and your result is twice as big or twice as small. Math models are very easy to make and very hard to make right. A good example may be the weather 14 days out. Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent on those prediction models for weather. But they are no better than a monkey throwing darts.
When someone says that their model predicts a million deaths, its because the makers of the model want it to predict a million deaths. They could have made it show fifty thousand deaths but they did not want it. A model is like an expert, you can find one that will say anything.
So lets just stop and apply a little logic to the situation.
The following are are the facts:
1. We have been dealing with this for two months.
2. Since the beginning there are only 94,167 deaths at the worst (and this number is likely 25% inflated which to to say that the real number is 65,000 — but lets play worst case scenario)
3. Peak death rate was Aparil 15 - April 19 (four weeks ago)
4. March 24 was when we had 1,000 deaths in the US (assuming again the most liberal numbers are correct)
CONCLUSION:
1. In order for this new “ominous” model to be correct, there would need to be an INCREASE in rate by 1.5x over the next 8 weeks
2. The death rate has deteriorated 40% since peak
3. The virus DOES NOT survive on surfaces (CDC yesterday)
4. UV radiation, heat and humidity make environment inhospitable to this virus.
This model does not pass the smell test
Bonius round: Israeli mathematician who modeled a 70 day life cycle irrespective of mitigation techniques appears to have been correct on multiple countries, including ours.
This model is nothing more than something to generate buzz, fear, and promote the school. Modelers are NEVER held responsible, but the impact of the forecast it always high.
This must end.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.