The 0bama-worshiping flying monkey corps (ANTIFA, BLM, etc) are being called into action. Buy popcorn.
If there will ever be any prosecution of soroznazi and his puppets, including his pathetic little illegal immigrant in chief BHO, now is that time.
Obama’s panicking, Schiff’s panicking, Pelosi’s panicking, at least in somebody’s dream. It reminds me of a movie I saw where a government prosecutor and some Hollywood big hot were in an elevator together. The prosecutor starts haranguing the big shot about how he’s going down. As the elevator stops the big shot turns to him, says “If I’m the one going down, why are you the one who’s sweating?” and calmly walks away.
That's ridiculous.
“our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk,”
The key word here is-”OUR”
The creep is a lying filthy lazy useless waste of skin.
/Sarcasm Off
This Communist bastard never once cared about the rule of law, let alone the Constitutional restrictions on the powers of government and the rights of the free people.
Uh-oh, now she's done it...
No drama Obama is not panicking.
He is untouchable because the GOP assisted in his usurpation.
Obama should never have been anywhere near the White House.
He is not a natural born citizen.
It wasn’t just a technicality.
There could be video of that meeting with Obama saying “Get Trump” and Obama would still be untouchable.
Just like Biden can brag about blackmailing the Ukrainians to get a prosecutor fired and Trump gets impeached for it.
The GOP sold their souls to the devil when they went along with the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
Obama is panicking>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And well he should.
As President Trump has said,”They are gonna pay!”
The perpetrators, including Obama,. now find themselves in extreme jeopardy, so Obama is now spreading disinformation. Here is what Obama so wrongly and tortiously organized for Flynn :
1) A crime with no predicate.
2) falsification of FBI forms 302
3) FBI investigator notes which indicate political motivation
4) Meetings at the highest level in which Rice revealed in her memos what strategy was to be followed in framing Flynn, Obama,Biden, Comey, Rice, Clapper and Brennan were present at a series of such meetings.
Obama now taking to the media posturing himself to limit his exposure to liability, ( He will pay big time)
Add this up and it is but one result: Malicious Prosecution#
Because it involved organizational crime and racketeering, the extraordinary remedies available from a RICO offense are obvious.
And the various perpetrators of this crime , include a law firm which acted in conflict of interest ( Flynn’s original legal team that advised him to plead guilty), FBI Agent Strzok, Comey, McCabe,Yates, Rice, Brennan, Clapper and Obama himself. All of the perpetrators exceeded their governmental authorities of office so that the legal jeopardy is personal for these perpetrators, the government nor the taxpayers are liable for these millions of dollars in damages. All of the perpetrators are personally liable in the millions of dollars. (Not to mention the federal crimes of sedition, treason and espionage, and the likely disbarment of several attorneys involved in Flynn’s original defense team.)
I expect that letters pleading settlement have already been received by Flynn’s legal counsel. For the benefit of America, I hope General Flynn proceeds to a public civil trial in a malicious prosecution suit for damages.Let them all lose their homes and livelihoods in return, for that is indeed what Justice demands.
**********************************************
#
“Malicious prosecution is an intentional tort designed to provide redress for losses flowing from an unjustified prosecution....
“Under the first element of the test for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must prove that the prosecution at issue was initiated by the defendant. This element identifies the proper target of the suit, as it is only those who were actively instrumental in setting the law in motion that may be held accountable for any damage that results....”
“The second element of the tort demands evidence that the prosecution terminated in the plaintiff’s favour. This requirement precludes a collateral attack on a conviction properly rendered by a criminal court, and thus avoids conflict between civil and criminal justice. The favourable termination requirement may be satisfied no matter the route by which the proceedings conclude in the plaintiff’s favour, whether it be an acquittal, a discharge at a preliminary hearing, a withdrawal, or a stay. However, where the termination does not result from an adjudication on the merits, for example, in the case of a settlement or plea bargain, a live issue may arise whether the termination of the proceedings was in favour of the plaintiff....
“The third element which must be proven by a plaintiff — absence of reasonable and probable cause to commence or continue the prosecution — further delineates the scope of potential plaintiffs. As a matter of policy, if reasonable and probable cause existed at the time the prosecutor commenced or continued the criminal proceeding in question, the proceeding must be taken to have been properly instituted, regardless of the fact that it ultimately terminated in favour of the accused....
“Finally, the initiation of criminal proceedings in the absence of reasonable and probable grounds does not itself suffice to ground a plaintiff’s case for malicious prosecution, regardless of whether the defendant is a private or public actor. Malicious prosecution, as the label implies, is an intentional tort that requires proof that the defendant’s conduct in setting the criminal process in motion was fueled by malice. The malice requirement is the key to striking the balance that the tort was designed to maintain: between society’s interest in the effective administration of criminal justice and the need to compensate individuals who have been wrongly prosecuted for a primary purpose other than that of carrying the law into effect.”
***********************************************
http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/M/MaliciousProsecution.aspx
************************************************
Where is your shuck and jive now Mr. Obama?
EXACTLY! Their understanding of the rule of law is at risk, and thank goodness. Maybe, now, our understanding of justice [equal, fair, due process, evidence, according to a strict construction of the laws as written and a liberal construction of the constitutional rights of citizens] can now prevail
The FBI was on a crime spree, and its master, it was the 44th president.
The walls are closing in on this elitist anti-american prick.
Obama gave Pearson Publishing $350 million to create Commoncore text and Pearson gave Obama a $65 million dollar book deal in return. Investment Watch ^ | 12/8/19 |The Obamas’ $60m book deal has broken all records. From James Patterson to JK Rowling and Pope John Paul II, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3805839/posts
Obama gave Pearson Publishing $350 million to create Commoncore text and Pearson gave Obama a $65 million dollar book deal in return. Investment Watch ^ | 12/8/19 |The Obamas’ $60m book deal has broken all records. From James Patterson to JK Rowling and Pope John Paul II, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3805839/posts
SPJNK.
When Trump starts rattling their cage I figure he’s looking to come to another truce with them—not actually follow through.
“...according to a recording obtained by Yahoo News and confirmed by an Obama spokesperson.”
Even money says Obama leaked this himself. And the spokesperson is Big Mike.
Since when has obama EVER been concerned with the rule of law?
“deeply angered.” This is how these criminals act. How dare you uncover my crimes. THIS IS NOTHING SHORT OF TREASON! And you can probably guess how this is going to end, he will walk