Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coronavirus Survey Reveals 13.9% In New York Have COVID-19 Antibodies, Cuomo Says
WLNY ^ | 04/23/2020

Posted on 04/23/2020 8:31:32 PM PDT by BenLurkin

The state took 3,000 tests throughout New York to get a so-called snapshot of the infection rate.

The number from New York City was startling: More than a fifth tested positive, having recovered or been asymptomatic.

As far as the breakdown by region:
•Long Island, 16.7%
•New York City, 21.2%
•Westchester/Rockland, 11.7% •The rest of state 3.6%

Results show antibodies in 12% of women and 15.9% of men, but a disproportionate rate of antibodies in black and Latino New Yorkers. The governor says in part because many are essential workers.

“Also, you have more people in the New York City area. More people getting on subways, getting on buses, more people dealing with that density, and we know that’s where it communicates,” Cuomo said.

The Governor says he’s working with churches in those communities. Many have volunteered for testing sites.

(Excerpt) Read more at newyork.cbslocal.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: antibodies; coronavirus; covid19; newyork

1 posted on 04/23/2020 8:31:32 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

These numbers are very interesting in a variety of ways, ranging from throwing some shade on the veracity of the tests (the initial tests for positive/negative verification were performed on totals of about a dozen people);

to an expectation that the disease should really be burning itself out - and comparisons to the flu transmission rates;

to the notices that the test starts picking people up as positive at 4 days, when few people with the disease are even symptomatic yet.

And are folks who tested positive by the test even after a few weeks, actually immune to it now?


2 posted on 04/23/2020 10:14:12 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

You could not design a more efficient method of infecting as many people as possible as quickly as possible than packing most of your population into subway cars twice a day.


3 posted on 04/23/2020 10:33:18 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Re: “New York City - 21.2% COVID infection rate”

Let’s do the math...

NYC Population - 8.4 million

Number of Infections - 8,400,000 X 21.2% = 1.78 million

NYC COVID Deaths - 16,388

NYC Case Fatality Rate - 16,388 divided by 1,780,000 = 0.9%

Less than 1% of COVID infected persons in NYC die.

When you factor in the fraudulent accounting process for COVID-19 fatalities, the CFR in NYC is no more deadly than a serious influenza season.


4 posted on 04/24/2020 1:59:54 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

if you think .9% is low risk like the flu (.01%) then roll the dice. If I put 10 revolvers in front of you and only one had a bullet in it, would you pick one and put it up to your head and pull the trigger?
But at least you got the numbers right.
You get wrong the “serious influenza season” - there is no flu season that has that kind of death rate since 1918.


5 posted on 04/24/2020 4:36:20 AM PDT by brookwood (Obama said you could keep your plan - Sanders says higher taxes will improve the weather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson