"COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.
Posted on 04/04/2020 3:31:56 AM PDT by impimp
It’s just the flu, bro.
It is interesting to follow the countries who have Flubros as leaders: Mexico Brazil Belarus Sweden
While these countries aren’t 100% Flubro, they do represent one end of a spectrum. We can watch to see how both viral deaths and the economy fare there, relative to those nations that have taken more of a Fearper approach.
Some things to watch for: 1. If any world leaders discuss an endgame for their panic-driven lockdowns 2. Any evidence that people will stop inflating the official death count with people dying with Corona as opposed to from Corona 3. Any herd immunity talk in the news
We know the media is corrupt, that isn’t new to anyone on this board. What is new is that otherwise bright people are advancing an unsubstantiated theory that CV deaths are being intentionally over counted for an unspecified reason. Show me one example of a licensed, medical professional doing this and I’ll stand down. When one can’t answer the basic questions of who is doing this and most importantly, why, quack theories fall apart.
Freepmail me to be on the Flubros/bras ping list. I think I now know how to do ping lists.
A ping list right after posting the thread will help deflect the Fearper wave that happens right after posting the thread.
It’s a fair question. I have no idea actually.
NYC had 53,006 deaths from all causes in 2014
NYC had 2,220 deaths from Influenza and Pneumonia in 2014
https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Health/New-York-City-Leading-Causes-of-Death/jb7j-dtam
You have to export the data to Excel and add it up. But here’s another confirmation - a death every 9.1 minutes. There are 24*60 = 1440 minutes in a day. 1440/9 is 158
Your number of 400 deaths a day is probably for the entire state of New York, not New York City.
https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/planning-level/nyc-population/population-facts.page
If you died of pneumonia, and you test positive for CV, then they list you as having died of CV.
This isn’t an “article”. Did you know that The American Thinker lists over 4,900 “authors”? It is a blog for any retard who wants to write something.
"COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.
Add me to your ping list.
Can you not read? It is a f***ing article!
If you think this author is “retarded” for questioning the MSM/government narrative then just go back to watching CNN and stop wasting your time on a conservative site. Your 10 million (and counting) fellow citizens who no longer have a job will surely understand.
That’s it. The numbers are cooked. The more Covid numbers, the more money from Uncle Sugar.
Perhaps you missed the Dresden “debate” threads.
And the intolerant Hussein Head “consistent conservative” bullies here in 2016 who told us Trump was terrible, terrible, and NO conservative.
I got banned from FR for a week for liking Cruz. I liked Trump, but liked Cruz more at the time. I certainly hope that people aren’t banned for being on opposite sides of the Corona debate.
I can understand and agree with that.
Appears to be a lot of strawmanning here lately, so that we’re (almost?) all either alleging this virus is nothing worse than the flu and a HOAX, or THE WORLD IS GOING TO END UNLESS EVERYONE DOES WITHOUT QUESTION WHATEVER “THE GOVERNMENT” TELLS US TO DO EACH DAY, EVEN IF DIFFERENT THAN YESTERDAY.
More unproven baloney, not that it wouldn't have been deserving.
That is from the Twitter feed of Alex Berenson, who has a lot of interesting things to say about the COVID-19 affair.
https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson
A lot of people got whacked with the ban hammer back then. It wasn't so much that they liked Cruz, it was the fact that they formed up into mobs that descended onto any pro-Trump thread to attack anyone who disagreed with them with name calling and personal insults.
The most egregious example was the user "libbylu" whose opus is a prime example of what was going on. I'm not saying there weren't some on the Trump side who did the same thing, it just seemed at the time that they were greatly outnumbered by the vicious Cruz supporters.
Does this sound familiar, in the context of today's "flubros vs fearpers" dispute?
I have no idea if your ban was appropriate or not, nor do I care. But if people can't engage in rational discussions without resorting to infantile name calling and mud slinging, then they deserve to be banned.
I find a touch of mud-slinging humorous and fun. We can’t be to high brow, can we?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.