Posted on 03/26/2020 7:02:46 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Coronavirus is an icky disease that takes a cruel toll on the elderly, the sick, and the unlucky. In this modern era, we can outwit many things that once routinely killed people, but the Grim Reaper is still out there and hell eventually get all of us. Scary headlines have hinted that coronavirus is now the Grim Reaper's preferred method.
Media reports have told us that coronavirus is significantly more deadly than the flu, which annually kills 30,000 to 60,000 Americans. Based on the speed with which it killed in China, Italy, Iran, and Spain, it looked as if the American death toll could easily top two million people annually. While thats small potatoes compared to past pandemics (e.g., the Plague of Justinian, the Black Death, the Spanish Influenza), its a staggering toll in modern America. Any actions seemed worthwhile to America from turn into a viral slaughterhouse.
But that might not be what's happening.
At the Wall Street Journal (behind a paywall), Eran Bendavid and Jay Bhattacharya, two medical professors at Stanford, propose that were using the wrong math and that we are still missing the numbers we need to do the math correctly. However, by extrapolating from available data, one can argue that coronaviruss mortality rate is significantly lower than the early estimates.
According to the doctors, The true fatality rate is the portion of those infected who die, not the deaths from identified positive cases. When calculating the mortality rate, while we know the numerator (the number who have died), were using the wrong denominator. If the denominator is only those sick enough to get the test in the first place, that small number will return a much higher mortality rate.
The real denominator should be the total number of people who catch this contagious virus.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Until we start comparing apples to apples, we will get this continuing disparity on projections and the severity of the virus. The more data we acquire from testing, the clearer the picture will become.
However, this might be the very first instance of an ad hoc centralized bio-command attempting to assess/evaluate enemy strength/capabilities as a bio-attack is actually occurring.
It's demonstrating to each & everyone that traditional epidemiology methods are simply inadequate to manage new, radically altered circumstances. Not their fault - it's like blaming a vet for not being able to maintain an airplane.
What we have is proof that some kind of militarized CDC is going to be necessary going forward, and that measurement methods & counter techniques are going to have to be essentially 'invented' in order to provide reliable information/action to a command & control organization on a real-time basis.
Yup. When Trump started talking about re-opening the country he had to be receiving data which showed where we were headed.
I was definitely sick, but never bed ridden nor in need of being hospitalized despite being 70. My wife, daughter and grandson were exposed but never developed symptoms. The ER doctor told me they had seen a lot of this virus that definitely was not influenza. Im convinced it may well have been COVID-19
The hoax slowly unravels.
It will be interesting to see what the final numbers are. A LOT depends on the denominator. (US numbers)Bring Out Your DeadCompleted cases (dead+recovered) = 62.8% dead
Lancet (dead 14 days ago+recovered)= 7.05% dead
Total cases = 1.5% dead
Population = 0.000317% dead
Entire known universe population = 0.0000136% deadThe Lancet algorithm is probably the most accurate, it better accounts for the shorter time to die than recover.
Don't be too alarmed by the 7.05%, it is a small data set, the world rate has been around 4% since Late February.
Post to me or FReep mail to be on/off the Bring Out Your Dead ping list.
The purpose of the Bring Out Your Dead ping list (formerly the Ebola ping list) is very early warning of emerging pandemics, as such it has a high false positive rate.
The false positive rate was 100%.
At some point we may well have a high mortality pandemic, and likely as not the Bring Out Your Dead threads will miss the beginning entirely.
*sigh* Such is life, and death...
If a quarantine saves just one child's or one old farts life, it's worth it.
Many thanks for y’all’s analysis!
No. Humans recognized and understood the benefits of quarantine and cordon sanitaire many centuries ago. We learned how to stop it and prevent its spread. Weve gotten a lot better at that recently, too.
Interesting. I will tweet this with attribution.
Then antibiotics happened, and we got complacent, and forgot.
We're relearning fast!
Weve gotten a lot better at that recently, too.
And as you say, improving on the old knowledge!
The number of states that have 12 or fewer deaths from the virus is 36. We need a policy of differentiation, not one size fits all.
It's like a broad pitched battle - Waterloo? "The damn-nearest run thing you ever saw in your life".
Excellent post!
A heavily bureaucratized CDC simply isn’t - can’t be - up to this sort of black swan epidemic. Most of the time, it excels at routine public heath issues.
There are no cast in concrete procedures for extraordinary events, nor can they be.
Militaries are pretty good at adapting most of the time. It only took some 20 million deaths and 4 years or so to figure out just throwing more troops into trenches wasn’t working...
It’s a good dry run for a real bio attack.
“Tiger claws” — good chinese medicine.
?
How lucky are we if we just miss impact? (Actually, the economic/social effect was a direct hit.) It's like those educational movies "Scared Straight". We literally experienced how one potential future could unfold. Now we have a fire lit under our collective ass. "Never again", right?
Hey, on that note, I'm tentatively calling it. I'm not one to make bold claims; I'm actually pretty chickenshit, hiding behind lots of qualifiers. But Italy just reported their 35th day from the first CV fatality (as of 3/26), and the pattern is starting to look really flat. To get the line moving upward again at this point would take monster numbers. Not saying it couldn't happen, but it's beginning to look highly unlikely.
CV Mortality
Italy vs US (net NY)
Italy 35 days actual
US 26 days actual, 27-35 projected
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.