Where is the list of states?
Deport all Illegals …… ASAP!
Problem solved.
born in Haiti.
“The coalition also argues that the rule deprives the states of valuable contributions made by immigrants.”
That’s B.S. The government and the law do not presume that a requested asylum will meet the legal requirements for granting such a request, as adjudicated by the immigration courts, just because such a request is made.
Therefor it is not a matter of “immigrants” per se, it is although really about LEGAL immigration standards, which even an asylum seeker must be held to.
The protesting AGs make two great errors. They lump illegal immigration with legal immigration, and they ask the legal process to presume all asylum requests meet the legal tests for that request, before the immigration officials are even able to investigate and adjudicate it. They would have “asylum” seekers passed through the border posts with nothing more than a future court date which history shows most will never show up for.
Their “defense” of the asylum seekers is an offense to the country because, if their ideas was policy it knowingly will increase the U.S. population of illegal immigrants.
Where are they getting this “immigrants of color” nonsense from?
Talk about a straw man.
I guess I am opposed to efforts by AG Becerra to normalize rape of small children. He must be stopped!
The whole world would be ‘fleeing persecution’ if they get away with this.
The Congress cannot micro-manage immigration. The President has pretty clear authority.
“... the Trump administration is working to limit immigration from countries of color...”
Color? I guess that includes all those plaid folks too.
Its really all about future Democrat voters. ‘Nuff said.
Just another reason why Trump MUST be re-elected.
Lying bsterds.
Besides what “immigrant” is NOT “a gentleperson of couleur?”
DC has an AG?
Who knew.
Apparently he thinks having borders is waciss.
And Invasion is a Civil Right, but only if you are non-White.
When it comes to this We’re suppose to let them in ?
WHY ARE WE ALLOWING CITIZENS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES
WHO ENTER US ILLEGALLY GRANT THEM RIGHTS
THAT THEIR COUNTRY DENY US HAVING
WHEN WE ENTER THEIRS LEGALLY TO VISIT OR RETIRE ???
The issue of sovereignty should not be allowed to get twisted into being propagandized as “White Nationalism”. Use of that term is usually directed when the immigration issue is brought up to devalue of the protections an American citizen have by being one. When allowing the hordes illegally entering the US through the Mexican border avoid enforcing the reciprocal 2nd class treatment that American citizens get while legally residing in Mexico which of course also includes denial of voting privileges..
Today’s so called democrats insist Americans must allow illegals storm in here by the hundreds of thousands despite their cost to us of billion$ in tax dollars,which is never enough. Tax money that should be going to our citizens for their sustenance,health,education,and housing even infrastructure needs. But Americans must do the tax flagellating punishment because we’re the very rich United States and must divert those billion$ to fill the needs of those poor illegals plus give them the right to vote. Sustained by our tax money which our children’s children if not aborted will be paying for.?
Besides flooding the labor market with cheap labor which reduces job opportunities for American citizens in a diminishing base. Highly infectious communicable diseases are also pouring through this uncontrolled border creating serious health problems.
This destructive utopian Mexican open border approach of even considering granting those who enter the US illegally through it. Entitlement to all benefits way beyond those of what Mexicans give to our citizens in Mexico destroys the value of an American citizenship. It is being promoted by the name callers in socialist circles known as the democrat party as well some republicans who use such terms as “nativist” promoting racial division .
What we should be doing is taking a very very hard look at our relationship with Mexico along with trade and its myriad miss treatment of Americans as 3rd class citizens and its claims on American territory . There is no doubt there are hundreds of complaints, if not thousands, from American citizens who have retired there. Along with travelers running to American consulates about conditions that are going unreported because of this Mexican policy
Why are we expected to allow Mexican citizens enter to our country illegally and offer them preferential treatment over our citizens allowing them to purchase land in their own name and voting privileges when an American cannot do either if they choose to retire in Mexico ?