Posted on 03/06/2020 2:59:24 AM PST by Libloather
Rather ironic that these are the same people who destroyed the chances of Sarah Palin. Liz Warren didn’t lose because she was a woman. She lost because she was perceived to be unsuitable even by people who thought HRC was suitable. That says she was really, really unsuitable.
And by the way, wasn’t Hillary Clinton a woman? Did she not win the nomination and get many, many votes (thank God not in the right places).
Same journo-lists applauded as Sarah Palin was called a c**t and comedians told rape jokes about Sarah Palin and her daughter.
You’re right, Warren was a terrible candidate. She came in third in her own state!
Good riddance!
Damn Democrats hate women. That’s the problem.
Warren only got 22% of the vote in her home state. She was a terrible candidate. She went from talking about economic issues to some bizarre super woke nutcase who couldn’t pander enough.
She served the purpose of destroying Bloomberg in the debates. She scalped him. She also split the leftist vote and hurt Bernie. When it was obvious she was dead in the water, she stayed in the race.
Seems like a good Senate seat to target for us when she’s in the low 20s. That’s a state sick of its Senator.
That’s like serving a burnt steak and blaming you for not liking meat.
Its not misogyny, it’s bitcsogyny.
“...or what it’s like to have your reproductive freedom legislated by people with different reproductive organs...”
Hmm. Let me tell you about “reproductive freedom,” you stupid #(*$. How about this scenario - you reproduce and some immoral female decides she’s going to murder your baby because she doesn’t feel like being uncomfortable or changing diapers, or just because she feels like it. How’s THAT for “reproductive freedom”?
And, while we’re at it, how about the “reproductive freedom” of the 60 million human beings that will NEVER reproduce because they were never allowed to be born because you professional idiot “victims” can’t do anything other than sit around and whine about your “rights”?
Yes, Warren was simply a loser candidate. There’s no denying that truth.
Thank God, we don’t have to listen to her ridiculous rambling deceptive claims and witness her elderly calisthenics any longer this year.
Donkeys are sexist.
“ simply brings a different sensibility to the issues that shape the lives of 164 million Americans.”
Ok, lady, I get it. The rats are sexist. So what are you all going to do about it?? The usual?? (Yawn).
Hmm. Let me tell you about “reproductive freedom,” you stupid #(*$. How about this scenario - you reproduce and some immoral female decides she’s going to murder your baby because she doesn’t feel like being uncomfortable or changing diapers, or just because she feels like it. How’s THAT for “reproductive freedom”?
__________________
If men have not learned that they should never put their penises into any woman who does not share their values and legal commitments they need to right now.
Without marriage and a similar worldview, there is nothing.
Not anti-woman but definitely anti-Cherokee.
Dems really like their old white guys don’t they?
Democrats are misogynist but still made Warren a U.S. senator. Okay.
Is it mysogeny to say ‘no’ to adding one more lying woman to a man’s life, especially one that just migt get him killed, when she gets all upset?
I’ve said it before, but I’ll say it again. White women voted for a black man, and we got Obama. But black men would not vote for a white woman, so we didn’t get Hillary. I’m not made about the result, but it does irk me that white women are so accommodating to black men, and never seem to notice it is NOT reciprocated.
Anyone who really wants to vote for a woman can vote for Tulsi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.