Rather ironic that these are the same people who destroyed the chances of Sarah Palin. Liz Warren didn’t lose because she was a woman. She lost because she was perceived to be unsuitable even by people who thought HRC was suitable. That says she was really, really unsuitable.
And by the way, wasn’t Hillary Clinton a woman? Did she not win the nomination and get many, many votes (thank God not in the right places).
You’re right, Warren was a terrible candidate. She came in third in her own state!
Good riddance!
Damn Democrats hate women. That’s the problem.
Warren only got 22% of the vote in her home state. She was a terrible candidate. She went from talking about economic issues to some bizarre super woke nutcase who couldn’t pander enough.
She served the purpose of destroying Bloomberg in the debates. She scalped him. She also split the leftist vote and hurt Bernie. When it was obvious she was dead in the water, she stayed in the race.
Seems like a good Senate seat to target for us when she’s in the low 20s. That’s a state sick of its Senator.
Excellent points!
More proof of Rule #1 in the Liberal Handbook;
It's always someone else's fault.
The usual suspects just can't seem to get it through their heads that gender has nothing to do with it. Liz Warren is a jerk. A liar and she never had a chance at the nomination.