This is what you get when you tell Coal Miners to learn to code.
If Dems are involved, it doesn’t matter what method is used, the tally is going to rigged anyway.
I saw a cartoon today that said
When you ask aeronautical engineers if airplanes are safe, they reassure you very convincingly they are.
When you ask elevator engineers if elevators are safe, same thing.
But when you ask computer engineers if computerized voting systems are safe, they always say HELL NO!
That’s your vanity?
AGAIN, and it sees like I’ll get to type this lots of times.
What version of Android or Windows was out in the Tammany Hall days?
Or a million other.
Come on man.
What an incredibly weak argument.
“paper ballots will lead to no or less cheating”
That’s a joke
Perhaps this will convince the Left of the need for strong, uniform, incorruptible voting processes? Naw, I doubt it.
- fully traceable paper ballots only. No computers, no internet
- valid ID needed to vote
- registration closes 1 week before election. No same-day registration
- No “drive up” voting
- No early voting
- No absentee voting. Get your fat ass to a polling place.
Anything else, like internet “apps,” are a recipe for fraud and incompetence to take over.
Democrats can’t code. Or even count.
For actual governmental voting:
Voter ID;
Paper ballots, saved for 90 days;
Two-party tally, reporting & ballot control;
Permanent + UV ink purple thumbprint on precinct sign-in sheet.
I was an IT Administrator for a school district at one time and I had the task of creating an online vote for president in the 2008 race for the middle school kids to vote.
The school system had a sharepoint back end for the internal intranet so I used that to create it. All the students had their own logon for the school network and they could only vote once. It worked well. It was easy to program/set up, assign the student groups to the page, publish the page on the school internal webpage. Tested it, tested it again and deployed.
PS. Obama won
Computer tally with no paper trail, no way. These days they should go to the trouble of tallying paper too the compare the results.
Does anyone think they can do better than President Trump in 2020?
-PJ
Hey. It worked like a charm. The Dims got what they wanted in Iowa.
I have 20+ years. in any election counted electronically, he who has access to the database will determine the result - no matter how the votes were counted, or how many there were.
The Iowa app was designed and implemented by Clinton campaign people.
It was unnecessary in the first place. But the DNC decided to use it.
Biden and Buttigieg also use the company for their campaign apps.
Hmm.
I agree with you. But good luck trying to convince conservatives that there is massive vote fraud.
The states have never expressly constitutionally given ordinary citizens the specific power to vote for president like citizens have for electing members of Congress.
So just like 17th Amendment-protected power to vote for senators sometimes backfires on the Progressive Movement elite, our politically correct power to vote for president, power which violates the 12th Amendment and possibly other constitutional provisions imo, has probably backfired on the Democratic elite in this Iowa situation.
Patriots need to elect a new patriot Congress that will promise to fully support PDJT’s already excellent work for MAGA, now KAGA! (Keep America Great Always!)
Al Gore started this, when he convinced many people that his supporters were too stupid to vote on paper - in order to delegitimatize his failure to win election.
Part of the Iowa problem is that they started using a form of ranked choice voting. They are using it here in Maine and it is a disaster.
Define a computer tallying votes. Or, are you insisting on adding up votes by paper and pen?
Agreed