Wallace is a despicable bastard.
Wallace is the same smug, snarky liberal piece of crap his old man was.
he acted like a d head
I can’t stand him. He gets more unhinged every time I see him. Yesterday he was giving Dershowitz a lesson on the Constitution.
Hold tight, they’re all taking their masks off. And good for Katie, she’s owed an apology.
His side is losing and he knows it. You can always tell when they start losing it like this.
I can’t watch him.
They need to ‘ Do a Smith’ on Wallace .
Goodbye dips#it
Liar Wallace is a biased anchor who INTERRUPTS
anyone who supports the ELECTED PRESIDENT.
when not lying and interrupting,
the malicious SOB supports backstabber Romney.
I absolutely cannot stand the guy. He was just on Fox in the last 30 minutes or so saying you can tell the R’s are nervous because of Bolton’s book comments and that their comments that it’s meaningless is PROOF they are worried! LOL what a loser
Katie had her facts lined up.
Chris never said what was not a fact.
Just attacked her.
She did not back down
Wallace recognizes that Katie is smarter and certainly more likable/persuasive than he is. In short, he recognizes that she is a threat to his agenda.
I was screaming at him he was so horrible!
Katie’s voice shook a little but she definitely held her on
Wallace should declare himself a communist/democrat/ and get it over with
Wallace is a perfect example of the Seed Not Falling Far from the Tree. His Dad Mike Wallace was a consummate Liberal who for years ranted against Conservatives on CBS 60 Minutes and other media venues. Chris is just as bad. Every time Fox puts him on, I change the Channel. It is time for Fox to ship him off to CNN or MSNBC.
So is Wallace going to apologize to her for the false accusation? If he doesn’t, then Fox itself takes the hit for lack of integrity
Pavlich was explaining that never before has an impeachment trial had a witness that wasn't first heard by the House.
Wallace jumped in saying "Not true! Not True!"
Wallace said that there were Clinton witness who were heard by the Independent Counsel and not the House, so "Get your facts right!"
Pavlich argued that the results of the Independent Counsel were still given to the House before being forwarded onto the Senate, so the House had all that material to include in their Articles of Impeachment, as opposed to witnesses today whose testimony was NOT included in the House's Articles of Impeachment.
It's crazy for Wallace to go nuts over this point. The facts are on Pavlich's side that the House knew what the relevancy of the testimony was before sending the Articles over to the Senate, as opposed to calling witnesses today.
-PJ
WALLACE: Well, I guess I just -- I don't want to get too much into the weeds here and litigate this, but there's two points. One, in the Nixon tapes case in 1974, the court said the assertion of executive privilege must yield to evidence in a criminal case. And the president is being tried in a criminal case.
Dude can't tell "impeachment and conviction" from "charged with a crime and conviction."
Set his obvious bias aside, who gives serious consideration to anything such a moron has to say?
Wallace, like father, like son..two giant turds
Maria Bartiromo's 'Sunday Morning Futures' show is far better anyway.
Yesterday, during an “interview” Wallace turned it into a huge argument with him taking the pro-impeachment position. There was no “interview” just a bunch of long-winded, rage and hate-filled belligerent spews.