[Political Junkie Too]

And Wallace chose such an inconsequential minutiae of a point to explode on, too.

Pavlich was explaining that never before has an impeachment trial had a witness that wasn't first heard by the House.

Wallace jumped in saying "Not true! Not True!"

Wallace said that there were Clinton witness who were heard by the Independent Counsel and not the House, so "Get your facts right!"

Pavlich argued that the results of the Independent Counsel were still given to the House before being forwarded onto the Senate, so the House had all that material to include in their Articles of Impeachment, as opposed to witnesses today whose testimony was NOT included in the House's Articles of Impeachment.

It's crazy for Wallace to go nuts over this point. The facts are on Pavlich's side that the House knew what the relevancy of the testimony was before sending the Articles over to the Senate, as opposed to calling witnesses today.

-PJ

[colorado tanker]

She was right and Chrissy was wrong. With Clinton, independent counsel went first, then the House, then the Senate. The Senate did not hear any witnesses not heard by the House.

Here, independent counsel did not charge the President with any crime. The House went forward anyway, but refused to give the President due process rights to cross-examine or call witnesses.