To: Red Badger
Not an expert but it definitely different from the original. Anatomically, I don’t think that a lamb’s eye faces that forward (as a predator might). The original is more accurate.
5 posted on
01/22/2020 8:24:30 AM PST by
dhs12345
To: dhs12345
I'd say you are correct:

To: dhs12345
The new one actually was the original. It was repainted a couple of centuries later to give it a more sheep-like look.
I think people are reading way too much into this. If you look at many paintings of the time, you will notice that painters, even good ones, simply did not get the eyes and face shape right on a lot of animals.
22 posted on
01/22/2020 8:37:18 AM PST by
livius
To: dhs12345
Anatomically, I dont think that a lambs eye faces that forward (as a predator might). The original is more accurate. Agree!

58 posted on
01/22/2020 10:37:54 AM PST by
Albion Wilde
(It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. --Douglas MacArthur)
To: dhs12345
Not an expert but it definitely different from the original. Anatomically, I dont think that a lambs eye faces that forward (as a predator might). The original is more accurate. It's the 'weird' one that's the original! and you're right, a lambs eyes do not face forward but sideways for greater span..............
Check out new info here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3869655/posts
76 posted on
07/30/2020 5:11:57 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(To a liberal, 9-11 was 'illegal fireworks activity'..........................)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson