Skip to comments.BOMBSHELL: Researchers paid poor women in Mexico to be inseminated, then abort
Posted on 01/17/2020 7:42:26 PM PST by Morgana
A study published in a peer-reviewed medical journal is coming under fire for what appear to be major ethical issues. The study, published in this weeks issue of Human Reproduction, involved researchers paying generally impoverished women in Mexico to be artificially inseminated and become pregnant; their embryos were then flushed out, researched, and then either frozen for future use or destroyed. Women who remained pregnant underwent chemical or surgical abortions.
NPR reported on the research, explaining that the goal was to find an easier and less expensive way for infertile couples to get pregnant an alternative to IVF. We have now a method that can produce embryos that are of good quality or better than in vitro fertilization, Santiago Munne, a reproductive geneticist who led the study with CooperGenomics out of New Jersey, told NPR.
Eighty-one Mexican women recruited for the research were given hormone injections, which stimulated egg production, and were then artificially inseminated. With IVF, eggs would then typically be extracted through a needle, then fertilized in a lab. But with this method, the women became pregnant through artificial insemination, and the ovaries were then flushed out a few days later through lavage. The embryos were then researched and compared to embryos created through IVF.
One of the reasons for the study was to screen for conditions like cystic fibrosis, and to destroy any embryos found to have any such conditions. For couples that have genetic abnormalities and are at risk of transmitting them . by selecting the embryos that are not affected, they can have a normal baby, Munne said, adding, This is the first time that human embryos conceived naturally have been analyzed genetically to see if they are normal or not. The advantage is that these embryos are conceived naturally so you dont need in vitro fertilization to do the genetic testing of the embryos.
Some, like Laurie Zoloth, a bioethicist at the University of Chicago, found this research to be unethical. What this essentially does is use a womans body as a petri dish, Zoloth told NPR. And theres something about that that seems so profoundly disturbing. Munne, however, denied that there were ethics issues, saying that the research was approved by the Ministry of Health of the State of Nayarit in Mexico, and the Western Institutional Review Board in the United States. We passed all the ethical committees and all the ethical checks and balances, he said.
Zoloth seems to be an outlier, however, with others praising the research. This is a really well done study, Catherine Racowsky, an embryologist and professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Harvard Medical School, told NPR. We may actually have here a technology that in the future may be very helpful for couples trying to complete their families at a lower cost, which is important.
And while C.B. Lambalk, the editor-in-chief of Human Reproduction, did acknowledge that there were things that raise your eyebrows, he also said the findings could be useful.
As for Munne, he claimed, There is no difference between an egg donation cycle and what we did here.
However, that couldnt be further from the truth. This kind of research was rife with numerous issues. Exploitation of poor, minority women
One of the biggest issues with this research is that an American genetics firm paid poor women in Mexico exorbitant amounts of money to undergo the research, which is not free of risk. Each woman was paid $1,400, which may not seem like much in the United States. But in the area where these women lived, that equals more than two months worth of salary. This business of reproductive technology including egg donation and surrogacy has long been criticized as problematic.
Most of the women who agree to undergo this kind of research, or be egg donors or surrogates, tend to be young women or women living around the poverty line, meaning the draw of thousands of dollars could be coercive to them. As Stanford University points out, its also not unusual for these women to not fully understand the risks, which to this day are not fully known. Many egg donors, however, have complained of side effects ranging from endometriosis to ovarian cysts, fibroids, and infertility problems.
For an American company to pay poor Mexican women signifcant money to be experimented on is beyond exploitative and unethical. Abortion
The women were also made to go through abortions, both chemical and surgical, when some embryos were not successfully flushed out of the mothers wombs. Risky chemical abortions (abortion pill) are typically only committed early in pregnancy. Surgical abortions tend to be committed later in the first trimester.
While it wasnt clear which abortion procedure was committed on these women, an aspiration abortion is the most common first trimester procedure, but it raises the question nevertheless of how far along these women were in their pregnancies before having abortions as part of the study, or if they even had the ability to decline an abortion. Would a mother have been allowed to keep her baby, or would she have been coerced into an abortion? Dehumanization and eugenics
Its not entirely clear what happened to the embryos retrieved from the pregnant women in the study. According to NPR, there have so far been at least five pregnancies and three healthy babies. Others have been frozen, but presumably, some of them have been destroyed at the very least, the embryos found to have anomalies like cystic fibrosis or Down syndrome. The idea of screening embryos for which ones should be allowed to live is eugenics, plain and simple, and denying someone the right to life simply because they have a genetic condition or an extra chromosome is unethical. Children are being commodified, specifically due to the growing demand for things like IVF.
And while many might justify this kind of commodification, or think its not a problem to destroy an embryo because of something like Down syndrome, the truth is, an embryo is still a human being. Embryos may be small, but they are still living, growing human beings. They deserve to be protected not experimented on, frozen, and destroyed just because they happen to be in the most vulnerable state of their lives.
Here is the linky to that study
First PGT-A using human in vivo blastocysts recovered by uterine lavage: comparison with matched IVF embryo controls
Glad we defeated the nazis.
No, Mengele is dead and burning in Hell forever.
But the demon that possessed him lives....for now
God made it simple. Can’t get pregnant? Adopt!
Somebody please beam me up!
I’m sick of all the evil around me :-/
Scientists have already retrieved unfertilized ova in this fashion. They could do their in vitro genetic testing that way, after fertilization, and have.
They’ve been doing it for at least 35 years, in fact. Here’s a study from 1985. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4037016
What is the advantage to retrieving embryos rather than ova? Probably life span. An ovum lives 24 hours, an embryo (developing human) potentially 100 years, unless you kill it in the name of science.
Even for people who don’t value the life of an embryo in the least, you would think more of them would have ethical qualms about exploiting poor and uneducated women, and putting them at risk. Ovarian hyperstimulation is not an entirely benign procedure.
IVF should be illegal.
Dr. Mengele would have approved.
Well if it was good enough for Hitler and Josef Mengele, what’s the problem? /s
Before you rag on the doctors consider that this is how little the Mexican government feels towards it’s own citizens. It doesn’t give a damn about them. The Mexican elites don’t give a damn if they die in the desert violating our borders and our laws just so long as they themselves don’t have to care for them and the only thing the elites care about is the $22 billion dollars a year Mexicans take out of our economy and send back to Mexico.
$22 billion a year. It’s the only thing keeping Mexico afloat. Mexico is a parasite.
The mental and spiritual contortions that that those who think abortion is A-ok is a form of evil too difficult to comprehend.....God is the only help for them. As the Bible say for the rest of us.....”Pray without ceasing”.
Munne is a professor adjunct at Yale.
Moloch is still around and wanting his contributions.Liberals are willing to pay up and proselytize.
I notice no researchers signed up to become pregnant and abort themselves.
Wonder why that is, if the ethics were “ok” as claimed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.