Posted on 12/31/2019 10:54:36 AM PST by ransomnote
>>I did no such thing.
If you knew Defiant as we do, you wouldn’t have jumped to that conclusion. She hasn’t a bone in her body that thinks that way. She’s strong. Not ever into innuendo. It was pure accident that a normal speech pattern could be interpretted poorly.
“I have to start collecting MEME TEXT!!!”
There’s also a great photo of Obama falling off a paddle board out today.
*hint, hint*
#1254
Is this the same F_I that is fighting in court to keep Strzok and Page texts on government phones classified?
The Same F_I that lied to the public and the DOJ that Nunes memo was full of lies and half truths?
The same F_I that refuses to declassify the Fraudulent FISC warrants?
If you knew Defiant as we do, you wouldn’t have jumped to that conclusion. She hasn’t a bone in her body that thinks that way. She’s strong. Not ever into innuendo. It was pure accident that a normal speech pattern could be interpretted poorly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the first few months of Q threads, I said something to Bagster that some interpreted to be lewd and inappropriate. They asked to be removed from the ping list rather stiffly but I didn’t ask why - it’s none of my business. When they discovered through continuing commentary their interpretation was incorrect, they asked to be added back to the ping list. It happens.
In the moment of perceived offense, there are strong emotions. But now that the moment has passed, perhaps it’s time to halt the line of discussion.
very redacted
>> I am a dude, but thank you. I would hug you
And I’d love it. Hate Me, Too! There used to be so many great hugs out there.
>>very redacted
That’s a comfort.
Or 1212 with the tweet captured (which is now deleted).
but I thought that way...
It is one thing to leave the thread in a huff. I should know...
It is entirely different when one acts on their personal interpretation and has another member’s post pulled.
Bad form, what?
>>Bad form, what?
Misinterpretation all around can always be forgiven.
That looks like a headless body burning in the front seat.
I hope my response upthread did not imply that it was not serious. When I am accused, I am offended (it has happened to me at work, too). I took it seriously. However, the person(s) who accused me could not/did not see what I said in any other light, despite my explanations.
It’s one of the widest differences among people in that I’ve never gotten others to understand that I just don’t think as they do about certain phrases or words. At best I’ve had them tell me that I am naive, and I disagreed with that as well. I resented someone else “getting” to define what words mean for the rest of us. But to them - my error remained obvious and undeniable. That’s why I call it “the widest difference”, both sides understand differently and in their view, 100% correctly.
Trump to make a statement following fatal strike on Iran general
Published Fri, Jan 3 20203:12 PM EST
Kevin Breuninger
@KevinWilliamB
Interesting: Trump "accidentally" tweets a Q, and then removes the tweet and fixes the typos. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1213149807948312576 …
“That was the Bob Newhart show, wasn’t it?
Cute.”
It’s SCTV (Second City TV) from Canada...John Candy and Joe Flaerity (sp). Wonderful old show.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.