Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Woman Flips Against Dems “I was able to get rid of my Trump Derangement Syndrome”
newsthud ^ | December 20, 2019 | Paul Goldberg December 20, 2019

Posted on 12/27/2019 6:54:19 AM PST by Eddie01



TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: 2020; bellcurve; black; blackvoicesfortrump; blm; danielcameron; davidharrisjr; elizabethwarren; fauxahontas; kentucky; maga; massachusetts; politics; slingingbull; tds; trump; walkaway
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: bk1000

I remember one state where they suddenly found 20,000 votes for Hillary.


21 posted on 12/27/2019 7:59:51 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

Not laughing. Bernie has “The Free Shit Army”


22 posted on 12/27/2019 7:59:59 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

If the Democrats don’t screw Berne out of the nomination (again) then Steyer and Bloomie will split the Democratic vote.


23 posted on 12/27/2019 8:01:26 AM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bk1000
Lookit what they did to seat the sleep rape comedian. It's quite an old strategy they have pulled again and again. They used to pull that in Louisiana every election. The "School Buses" were used to circulate "voters" from precinct to precinct till they over came the votes of people not suffering from multiple personalities. They simply keep the election open till they have the winning numbers.

Try that with the lotto people!

24 posted on 12/27/2019 8:19:32 AM PST by rawcatslyentist (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfuAJcWl6DE Kill a Commie for Mommie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MuttTheHoople
Bush? Shrubya Jr. knew perfectly well who and what Hussein is, yet still to this day hasn't said peep!

Shrub IS a traitor!

25 posted on 12/27/2019 8:21:19 AM PST by rawcatslyentist (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfuAJcWl6DE Kill a Commie for Mommie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

The Left’s argument is & will be that economy/unemployment was steadily improving under Obama, and that Trump just inherited the momentum’s result.

We need a concise way to counter that.

Seems the economy/unemployment was improving _despite_ Obama. Prior recessions recovered in <1/4 the time. Trump restored & accelerated the recovery process.


26 posted on 12/27/2019 8:27:18 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Democrats oppose democracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Under then President Obama, black unemployment was over 19%, which was more than 3x that of whites. Under now President Trump, black unemployment is at a historical LOW, and only about 2 percentage points above whites.

Democrat words are pretty but cheap... Trump's action's are strong and make the world better.

Big difference.

27 posted on 12/27/2019 8:28:06 AM PST by GOPJ (Washington Post & NYT (protectors of corrupt white liberaul elites) sold out their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

LOL That’s a very good point.


28 posted on 12/27/2019 8:28:26 AM PST by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bk1000
Yours is the answer to the cheating we all know the Dem's are going to do: We must turn out in overwhelming force so that the cheating the Dem's have to do to win, is evident to everyone.
29 posted on 12/27/2019 8:29:43 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

That’s not the wind at Bernie’s back, that’s a heart attack.

But seriously, looking at polls Bernie has a very consistent base of 15-20% of the Democrats. But his competition is getting damaged. Biden’s corruption and dementia is showing. Warren’s dishonesty and previous legal work for big business against the little guy is coming out.

But I just don’t think Bernie is ever going to rise much above 20-30%. He is too open with his socialism/communism.


30 posted on 12/27/2019 8:30:28 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
The Left’s argument is & will be that economy/unemployment was steadily improving under Obama, and that Trump just inherited the momentum’s result.

The last quarter of 2016 came in a 1.9% GDP. That's under Obama.

The Obama economy never generated an economy at or above 3%.

That's fact.

31 posted on 12/27/2019 8:31:12 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
"...Right now he has the wind at his back..."

I think that is simply Sanders talking or exhaling...:)

32 posted on 12/27/2019 8:35:48 AM PST by rlmorel (Finding middle ground with tyranny or evil makes you either a tyrant or evil. Often both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
I believe Bernie can give Trump a run for his money because of AOC snowflake following! Laugh it will but I’m totally serious ..he is a bigger threat then Biden! Right now he has the wind at his back!
I’ll give you that Senator Sanders has the “shooting star” phenomenon - the fact that presidents don’t usually gradually gain popularity; Sanders is only in his second term, and he could have beaten Hillary for the nomination in ’16. So there’s that.

But some things give me comfort:

  1. the economy, contrasted with still-fresh memories of what it was in the bad old days of ’16,

  2. incumbency and,

  3. Sanders has never had major executive experience. There’s a first time for everything, but no one who’s never been a governor has ever defeated a sitting president’s reelection bid.

    In fact, Warren G. Harding is the only senator ever to defeat a governor (ironically, both from Ohio) for an open presidency (and the country had serious Woodrow Wilson fatigue in 1920).

. . . and as in ’16, when DJT solidified his base with credible (and since fulfilled) assurances on the judiciary, I hope that Mr. Trump will find the right anti socialist message next year.

The other joker in the deck is how the exposure of the Deep State will play out in 2020. How many voters will realize what Obama did to Trump and, I doubt not, the entire Republican field in 2015 and 2016 - and how very dangerous to representative government the Democrat Party, in tacit cahoots with the journalism cartel and the “security” bureaucracy, has become.

FISA is up for reauthorization in ’20 - and there will be a huge stink over what the FISA court knew, and when it knew it. Considering that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes gave the court a pretty thorough heads-up a very long time ago - and that the FISA judge’s “rebuke” of the FBI was actually a slap on the wrist - reauthorization of FISA is gonna be a seriously tough sell. Trump might even veto it.

he is a bigger threat then Biden!
. . . which is saying nothing at all. Biden IMHO Biden would lose by a knockout in the first round. And the Democrats will know it - but they have no one with good credentials in their whole field unless it’s Governor Duval Patrick or Mayor Bloomberg. Possibly a Dark Horse nominee will come out of a brokered DNC convention. But, the Identity Coalition just might hit the wall.

33 posted on 12/27/2019 9:07:23 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Countryside counties need to manufacture their own 20,000 new votes, and nullify Democrat big city new found votes.

It is best that several counties compact together and declare new found votes INVALID and nullified, unless they are proven by legitimate Voter ID.

The only way to halt fraud is demand new votes be verified by Voter ID.

County Governments are stupid though, really stupid.
Republicans are stupid.

They need to incrementally take back control from the fraudulent city.

They MUST nullify all unproven city votes.

Then they must formerly declare the election invalid and fradulent.

Oh and yes, did I mention that Republicans are stupid.


34 posted on 12/27/2019 9:18:00 AM PST by TheNext (Universal Skeptic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

“The Democrats were even able to force the Republicans to sign a consent decree against calling the Democrats out on it”

Oh, yeah; I forgot about that! Considering that almost every RAT became a scofflaw during the Shiff/Nadler hearings, I think we can pretty much ignore the ridiculous consent decree. What’re they gonna do — lash us with wet noodles? (Does SCOTUS have authority over consent decrees, or do they pretty much stick to the Constitution?)


35 posted on 12/27/2019 9:18:48 AM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
The Left’s argument is & will be that economy/unemployment was steadily improving under Obama, and that Trump just inherited the momentum’s result.

I've had a couple pull that crap on me. I told 'em "That's a great Democrat campaign slogan - 'Vote for us so we can make the next guy look great.' "

They called me a racist.

36 posted on 12/27/2019 9:26:16 AM PST by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01
Encouraging.

Two incidents lately have encouraged me that some blacks are fed up with the race nonsense that the dems push.

My husband was checking out at a grocery store a few weeks ago. The woman behind him was a middle aged black woman who told the cashier as soon as she got the total for his cart that she was paying for it. He protested and she insisted so eventually he thanked her and left but tells everyone the story.

The second incident happened to me. We had a few errands to run so he dropped me off at a grocery while he took the truck to fill up. I move somewhat faster than he does, so I was standing outside the store waiting for him when one of the store employees said the lady in a car around the corner wanted to talk to me. There was a very elderly black lady who wanted to know if I needed a ride somewhere. I was blown away, I would not have offered a ride to a complete stranger and I thought it was an uncommonly fine gesture.

37 posted on 12/27/2019 9:52:52 AM PST by Bearshouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stormhill

It’s true and they are


38 posted on 12/27/2019 10:17:13 AM PST by Truthoverpower (The guv mint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
Does SCOTUS have authority over consent decrees, or do they pretty much stick to the Constitution?
In the United States, certiorari is most often seen as the writ that the Supreme Court of the United States issues to a lower court to review the lower court's judgment for legal error (reversible error) and review where no appeal is available as a matter of right.

Before the Judiciary Act of 1891, the cases that could reach the Supreme Court were heard as a matter of right, meaning that the Court was required to issue a decision in each of those cases. That is, the Court had to review all properly presented appeals on the merits, hear oral argument, and issue decisions. As the United States expanded in the nineteenth century, the federal judicial system became increasingly strained, and the Supreme Court had a backlog of cases several years long.

The Act solved these problems by transferring most of the court's direct appeals to the newly created circuit courts of appeals, whose decisions in those cases would normally be final. The Supreme Court did not completely give up its judiciary authority, however, because it gained the ability to review the decisions of the courts of appeals at its discretion through writ of certiorari. (snip)

. . . A party who wants the Supreme Court to review a decision of a federal or state court files a "petition for writ of certiorari" in the Supreme Court. A "petition" is printed in booklet format and 40 copies are filed with the Court. If the Court grants the petition, the case is scheduled for the filing of briefs and for oral argument. A minimum of four of the nine justices is required to grant a writ of certiorari, referred to as the "rule of four". The court denies the vast majority of petitions and thus leaves the decision of the lower court to stand without review; it takes roughly 80 to 150 cases each term. - Certiorari - Wikipedia


39 posted on 12/27/2019 10:38:21 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

PEACH AGAIN!! PEACH AGAIN!! HARDER!! HARDER!! Yea team! Go Donkeys!
Peach that m********er.


40 posted on 12/27/2019 4:16:21 PM PST by Sir Bangaz Cracka (wHAT A HOT STEAMING LOAD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson