Might as well update the userscript for FR to blank out any thread that starts with “IG Report”. I don’t think my blood pressure can take much more of this nonsense.
Trump needs to start using the term FISAgate.
Its Clinton. All of this is Clinton.
They went to some very twisted logic to conclude that there was no bias in opening the investigation. Lisa Page supposedly had little involvement in the decision. Szrok was involved but wasnt the primary decision maker. They try to pin it on Priestup. I guess he was the one with the least bias.
don’t worry here is what Wray just told ABC
@ABCPolitics
.
@PierreTABC
to
@GStephanopoulos
on his interview with Chris Wray: “I asked the FBI director point blank if he thought that the FBI had treated the Trump campaign unfairly. He said, ‘I do not.’” https://twitter.com/ABCPolitics/status/1204127432686653442
So? No charges means they will do even worse.
I’ll be satisfied when we see a public hanging of Brennan, Clapper and Comey for high treason against the Constitution and a coup against the Republic.
UM... WASN’T IT HIS JOB TO FIND OUT WHO?
IG Report: FBI Official Higher Up Than Peter Strzok Involved in Opening Crossfire Hurricane
Oh, Gosh.../S
Well, do tell!
All the way up to the Kenyan and his handler Val. Jar.
THIS report/investigation was NEVER going to be “the one thing” (Oak Island fans will get it).
Actually, it is far more devastating than I expected.
The Durham report/investigation will be the REAL DEAL.
Durham is a PROSECUTOR. He will indict people. People will GO TO PRISON!
Horowitz is just the opening act. Durham is the headliner.
Sessions really F’ed us! Now, FINALLY, Barr is on the job and moving full speed ahead!
I’m curious about the implications of the conspiratorial nature of the plot. I understand conspiracy can be criminal in and of itself, but what does that mean? Because the Crossfire Hurricane plot was a criminal conspiracy of the most blatant sort. Is it like criminal homicide, where you can be guilty of murder if someone dies during the commission of a crime even if you didn’t directly kill anyone? Meaning if one conspirator altered evidence (like Lisa Page did) is a co-conspirator (like Comey) liable for the same penalty even though he didn’t physically do the altering of evidence? I need some free legal advice here!
Why was Horowitz chosen for this investigation? Simply put he is a deep state swamp eel. Therefore he would protect the swamp.
FWIW, John Robinson has modified the software so the article headlines can be posted in full. As far as I know, he hasn’t stated the maximum length but it appears to be plenty long.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3797733/posts