1 posted on
12/06/2019 6:05:32 AM PST by
BenLurkin
To: All
I have no reason to doubt the official story.
2 posted on
12/06/2019 6:08:31 AM PST by
gibsonguy
To: BenLurkin
Sure, let them get a hold of guns that are firing blanks then mow them down in “self defense”. No messy trials and instant justice.
I kinda’ like it this time, but you can keep that kind of stuff there.
3 posted on
12/06/2019 6:15:12 AM PST by
Bullish
(My tagline ran off with another man.)
To: BenLurkin
"Some of the accused snatched the weapons from the police personnel and fired at them". "In self-defense, the police fired at the accused."I'm certainly glad the Police were able to react quickly and foil the escape attempt.
Apparently these Reconstructions work well at quickly closing cases.
4 posted on
12/06/2019 6:26:07 AM PST by
Navy Patriot
(Celebrate Decivilization)
To: BenLurkin
Only some of the accused were shot.
6 posted on
12/06/2019 8:44:09 AM PST by
Getready
(Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
To: BenLurkin
So, “shot while trying to escape”?
8 posted on
12/06/2019 10:20:54 AM PST by
Sans-Culotte
(With every passing day, I am a little bit gladder that Romney lost in 2012.)
To: BenLurkin
All of the accused thugs were shot and killed “while trying to escape”. Nope, nothing suspicious about that . . . or about holding a 3:00 am reconstruction of a horrific crime.
10 posted on
12/06/2019 12:30:36 PM PST by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: BenLurkin
Where did an Indian cop get a gun, Pakistan?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson