Posted on 11/23/2019 10:16:30 AM PST by ransomnote
You’ve been added.
The rules for fair use, as of now.
“Another way to use the work of another is if your use of the work can be considered fair use. Such uses typically include criticism, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Fair use is a defense to an infringement lawsuit, and in considering the defense, courts look at four criteria to determine whether the use qualifies as fair use: (1) whether the use is a commercial use or non-profit; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount of the work used; and (4) any effect the use might have on the market value of the protected work. If a court finds for the defendant on all of these factors, then the use is fair, and there is no copyright infringement.
Fair use also encompasses parodies and other transformative uses works that use a protected work in such a way that an entirely new work is created in the process. Parodies are given special attention, because an artist may take exception to his work being parodied which might involve ridicule and so refuse to license his work to a parodist. “
*this copying and pasting of someone else’s work is covered under the educational exemption :)
I used to be able to identify helicopters by the sound of their rotor thump before I could see them. I used to impress people by saying here comes a CH-53 or CH-46 or whatever and I was never wrong. Now they don’t have any of the same birds they used when I was in and I can’t do it anymore.
Sucks getting old.
Mark
Thank Q!
Forgot to add the quote.
There you go
gisd O
EXCELLENT!
I dont get it either, and I am not sure that we are interpreting the rules correctly. We may be too restrictive?
Have a gander at this:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3793869/posts?page=3310#3310
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think you’re the one who sent me the copyright restrictions from his website, right? I couldn’t find ‘em and you made it look easy? Or was it another sweet helpful FReeQ? Sometimes I get helpful FReeQs all confused in my brain.
When the Admin was asked why Garrison was elsewhere and we thought (still don’t know) that bitt was suspended for posting him here, the admin seemed surprised and said when we see his cartoons in the forum, we should just report it to admin for removal.
I do think all over the web, Twitter etc. there is now the sense that the copyright anvil is about to fall on conservative and Christian accounts/websites. Garrison cartoons were removed twice on that thread when bitt “went missing” and, with his website restrictions re his content, I think it’s properly interpreted. And we have been explicitly told no Ramirez cartoons (bitt again), so I was advising that unless we explicitly know it’s permitted - link only (I get separation anxiety when bitt is away). :/
In my pm ping - I explained that I believe admin is doing what they need to do. Whether I’m just becoming aware of the copyright issue now after years of ignorant bliss, or it really is, as I perceive it to be, an incoming cold front of copyright hostility aimed at political and religious parties who don’t fit the narrative, I want to help protect FR.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I go with bait. Rudy knows what he is doing, make no mistake.
Thanks for the link.
I can readily believe that all the State Dept witnesses except Ambassador Sondland (who ended up helping PDJT by recalling the “No quid pro quo” conversation) were clowns.
As I stated elsewhere, the deep undercurrent that created the chaos in Ukraine was the EU effort (aided by Obama) to absorb it (or most of it), placing them right up next to Russia.
President Trump upset the apple cart by setting a completely different America-first foreign policy with respect to Ukraine ... one that DOES NOT FAVOR THE EU and other globalist forces which control all the State Department clowns.
What? Someone was fornicating around? Again? Sorry I can’t help myself. I am trying to be free.
So sorry to all, especially the mod and ransom.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No apology needed on my account - I’m still learning. These pics don’t have rights posted on them so I used Google reverse image search to find it. I’m not used to doing that. This is an ugly learning curve but I hope to scale it in spite of myself and my limitations *my spirit is willing but my flesh is weak) :)
Nice, watched it.
I don’t know, I did post a description on how to find the copy right list. I also researched the Garrison Cartoons and found his website that did say permission was needed.
What I don’t know is whether anyone from FR ever had a dialogue with Garrison to request fair use on FR.
I do think that conservative sites will be under attack like never before, and it is best to be extra careful.
<< “ Rudy: Almost like our own little Snakehead. Subpoena ME! I wanna testify! I got SUBPOENA envy! “ >>
............
Perfect Comparison..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.