Posted on 10/21/2019 9:30:01 AM PDT by Steve1999
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) was unable to answer when initially asked what specific laws Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s lawyer, has broken. Harris, a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination, appeared on CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360” late on Oct. 18. Cooper asked her what she thought about reports that Giuliani sought a visa for Viktor Shokin, Ukraine’s former top prosecutor, against the efforts of the Ukrainian embassy and the State Department. Harris claimed Giuliani “has clearly broken many laws” and that his actions violated an “extraordinary number of rules and ethical laws.”
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
This Harris is the most vile character. To see her speak on video reminds me of a snake. She would do anything for power — anything.
“This Harris is the most vile character. “
Yup, she pretty blows.
This Harris is the most vile character. To see her speak on video reminds me of a snake. She would do anything for power — anything....
kinda like the clintons or many other democrats
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
So, if she is not eligible, why doesn’t someone point that out?
Any Democrat knows that when they are interviewed by the media, they are supposed to be asked only the easiest of soft-ball questions. Anderson Cooper should be fired for his impertinence.
All mouth, no brain.
Seems as though politics attracts a lot of vile characters, especially those on the commie left (plus Pierre Delecto).
Because BOTH parties want to run ineligible candidates and eliminate the natural protections of the natural born citizen clause.
What happened to her old standby of “we should have a conversation on that”?
“She obviously doesn’t know much.”
True enough; but what she, and all the other dems, know for a fact is that they don’t need to cite any laws, and so have never really considered the likelihood of having to make a case. It’s all political, and they have had the votes - and “case” - since 11/9/16.
She also knows that saying this plainly would not be good PR, so she elects to look the fool that she is.
She was an Attorney General once,wasn’t she????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.