[Mr.Unique]

Funny, because professing your support for Rudy would have gotten you a time-out or zot in 2007.

[laplata]

“Funny, because professing your support for Rudy would have gotten you a time-out or zot in 2007”.

That’s true.

[PlateOfShrimp]

He did have a few supporters here back then, but not many. I think there is now more realization that it is better to have someone who agrees with you 70% of the time, and fights like hell, than someone who nominally agrees with you all the time, and does nothing.

[FreeReign]

Funny, because professing your support for Rudy would have gotten you a time-out or zot in 2007.

Not supporting Rudy for president then and supporting what Rudy is doing today defending the president, seems appropriate to me.

[MitchRegal]

LOL.

[entropy12]

Yeah because Rudy is not 100% pro-life. Here we need to learn from the Gipper, who seldom insisted on purity.