Posted on 09/19/2019 12:37:26 PM PDT by Enterprise
Marquez Brothers, a company that manufactures Mexican-style cheese and other food products, has agreed to pay $2 million to settle a federal lawsuit filed more than two years ago over alleged racial discrimination.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced the settlement Wednesday. The suit stemmed from the experience of two African-American job applicants who alleged they sought job applications at the Marquez Brothers facility in Hanford, but were refused the paperwork.
While the two men identified in the lawsuit were black, a subsequent investigation by EEOC reportedly found other instances of discrimination against white, Asian and other races by the company.
(Excerpt) Read more at fresnobee.com ...
lol Let the personal lawsuits commence!
FYI, here’s the rascists: http://elmexicano.net/mexicano_wordpress/
If ICE raided the plants to sweep out illegals, there might be a few job openings.
They need to be declared Persona Non Graten.
[ California company refused to hire non-Hispanics, feds say. It will now pay $2 million ]
Imagine the lawsuits against companies refusing to hire white men over 40 during the entire Obama administration.
Or even today.
“found other instances of discrimination against white, Asian and other races by the company.”
aka, they kept the records. They’re morons and deserve it. Our production company only hires MAGA maniacs and been doing it for years. There are subtle “questions” to know if your applicant is a lib or a Trump guy, and we became good at it.
“They need to be declared Persona Non Graten.”
LOL!!!!!!!!! (-:
I hope I wouldn’t over think the answers and be thought of as a liberal.
see my tag line. We make sure we “hire” (then fire) libs and we enjoy them crying afterwards..
Should have SHREDDED the paperwork ...
In spite of their hiring practices - their cheese is tasty.
It sounds oddly racis’.
There are many companies like this.
Pay back.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponents Argument
The EEOC is based on the unconstitutional (imo), Democratic vote-winning Civil Rights Act of 1964 (CRA), and therefore has no constitutional justification to exist, a previous generation of career Democrats making the CRA to stay in power imo.
Regarding race and sex-based workplace discrimination, patriots are reminded that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect race and sex-based rights, but only in the context of voting issues, not workplace issues, evidenced by the 15th and 19th Amendments.
Section 1: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.Section 2: The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added].
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."
In fact, pre-FDR nominated, state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices had clarified that powers that the states havent expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds are prohibited to the feds.
10th Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
So this action by the feds is another example of the state sovereignty-ignoring feds unconstitutionally expanding the powers of the already unconstitutionally big federal government imo.
The remedy for unconstitutionally big federal government on our backs
Patriots need to elect a new patriot Congress in the 2020 elections that will not only promise to fully support PDJTs vision for MAGA, now KAG, but will also do this.
New patriot lawmakers also need to support PDJT in surrendering state powers that the feds have been stealing from the states for the last 100+ years back to the states.
And to make such changes permanent, patriots also need to support PDJT in leading the states to repeal the 16th and ill-conceived 17th Amendments.
Remember in November 2020!
MAGA! Now KAG! (Keep America Great!)
Laura Ingraham: Make America Greater!
They decided to sue instead.
$2 million bucks? Must be a lot of money in the cheese business.
Say CHEESE!
You are a shining light in a bitterly cold environment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.