Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google Photos can now search for text in your pictures -- here's how
C-Net ^ | September 1, 2019 | Katie Conner

Posted on 09/01/2019 9:50:56 AM PDT by BenLurkin

Quickly finding photos by searching for specific words.. and you can even copy and paste text.

Scrolling through 2,567 photos to find the precise picture you want can be a nightmare. Now, a new feature in Google Photos will let you search for pictures that have text in them so you can quickly find what you're looking for. You can even copy and paste the text when you find it.

The new tool makes it easier to find a recipe you saved, a funny meme you screenshotted or your bank account number. You can also use it to pinpoint a photo that you took of a Wi-Fi password, business card or phone number.

Google Lens powers this search feature. The company's image-searching software is available in Google Photos for Android and iPhone ($999 at Amazon). It's still rolling out, however, so if you don't see it yet, keep checking daily (and make sure the app is updated).

(Excerpt) Read more at cnet.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: googlelens; googlephotos; photos

1 posted on 09/01/2019 9:50:57 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

All digital photos have metadata.


2 posted on 09/01/2019 9:58:12 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"All digital photos have metadata."

Nope, not all digital photos have metadata.

Regardless, this article refers to visual data in the image, not embedded metadata.

3 posted on 09/01/2019 10:05:03 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY; E. Pluribus Unum

>>”All digital photos have metadata.”
Nope, not all digital photos have metadata<<

Well, they do but it is about the physical attributes of the contents (size, format, date taken, MAYBE GPS coordinates). not the content itself.

Metadata are data which describe data.


4 posted on 09/01/2019 10:31:31 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (As always IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; Gamecock; SaveFerris
You can also use it to pinpoint a photo that you took of a Wi-Fi password

Found it!

Best $999.00 I ever spent!


5 posted on 09/01/2019 10:41:42 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There are apps that have been around a long time that allow you to erase metadata on your pics, or any other photo in your possession.


6 posted on 09/01/2019 10:45:47 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yup


7 posted on 09/01/2019 10:47:37 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Looking at the code you can determine if the image has been photoshopped.

Islamic pricks hide messages in the code.


8 posted on 09/01/2019 10:50:17 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Q and others have been encouraging us to post memes on social media to get our conservative and anti deep state messages out in the public view. Up until now facebook and other social media have found it very difficult to block or shadow ban memes that run counter to their narrative because their software could not read the text in the memes. I wonder if censorship might be the true purpose of google’s new tool.


9 posted on 09/01/2019 10:53:56 AM PDT by ph_balanced
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I was under the impression, too, that all digital photos do indeed contain EXIF data. I have an app that allows you to remove it and I’ve used it for certain photos I’ve posted at times.

I would never use Google Photos ever. It’s bad enough we are monitored in so many ways but giving Google more power, no way!


10 posted on 09/01/2019 11:00:49 AM PDT by BlueHorseShoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ph_balanced

bttt


11 posted on 09/01/2019 11:21:44 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003; E. Pluribus Unum
"Well, they do but it is about the physical attributes of the contents (size, format, date taken, MAYBE GPS coordinates). not the content itself. Metadata are data which describe data."

Ok, fair enough.

I've written code that saves pure bitmaps with no metadata. Just pure bitmaps with no encoding or compression. Some of that software is still in commercial use for dedicated hardware.

As soon as you introduce variable image dimensions/resolutions, or compression of some sort, then you need metadata to describe the size of the bitmap and/or the encoding technique in order to render the image in a frame buffer.

All popular image formats use some sort of compression, usually lossy. So, yep, almost all contain metadata of some sort. The technical metadata is required as part of the image. Contextual metadata (date, GPS, camera ID, thumbnail, etc) is not.

12 posted on 09/01/2019 11:32:29 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY

I use imgOptim to wipe all metadata out of any picture I post. There’s no metadata in screen caps.


13 posted on 09/01/2019 11:39:32 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It left out the “here’s how” part.

OCR is what I assume.


14 posted on 09/01/2019 11:40:29 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Looking at the code you can determine if the image has been photoshopped.

Sometimes. A good image manipulator looking to pull of fraud of some kind can alter the code.

15 posted on 09/01/2019 12:22:00 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I use google as often as facebook.

NSA is much better.


16 posted on 09/01/2019 12:23:19 PM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

They’ll tell you the “how to” for a mere $999.

I’ll pass.


17 posted on 09/01/2019 1:43:27 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Can they ‘interpret’ flipping the bird?

Or going pew-pew with my finger and thumb?

I am due for digital amputation.

I will be a trans digital.


18 posted on 09/01/2019 1:48:27 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM, maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson