Posted on 08/24/2019 5:01:24 PM PDT by ransomnote
There is nothing necessarily unethical or unreasonable about eating human flesh, declare psychologists Jared Piazza and Neil McLatchie of Lancaster University, but careful reasoning over the merits of cannibalism is often “overridden by our feelings of repulsion and disgust.”
While not going so far as to recommend cannibalism, saying “there is no need to overcome our repulsion for the foreseeable future,” the two authors suggest that humans could master their aversion for human flesh if they needed to.
“Many people develop disgust for all kinds of meat, while morticians and surgeons quickly adapt to the initially difficult experience of handling dead bodies,” they note. “Our ongoing research with butchers in England suggests that they easily adapt to working with animal parts that the average consumer finds quite disgusting.”
Moreover, the psychological revulsion experienced over the prospect of consuming human flesh is not the product of reason and may even contradict reason, they argue in Wednesday’s article, which originally appeared last week in The Conversation.
“Survivors of the famous 1972 Andes plane crash waited until near starvation before succumbing to reason and eating those who had already died,” they propose.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Adultery, fornication, sodomy have been de-deviated so far and polyamory, pedophilia, and bestiality are coming up soon for “progressive” approval.
We are learning that those are all activities which the godless global “elite” have long favored.
I guess we shouldn’t be surprised when it turns out they practice cannibalism as well.
So eating cows is evil but eating people is good, eh?
That does indeed sound like an example of liberal “logic”
THere is a Cannibal Club in Los Angeles (website is .org) that prepares and serves human flesh. They say it’s legal. THey brag that they serve celebrities. *shudder*
And there goes the colloquialism “Bite Me”
Seriously, this is an early trial balloon by the EnviroTards. Same way they started in on normalizing pedos.
Have they started their campaign to normalize incest?
Long pig.
Since it is primarily non-whites who practice cannibalism, liberals will soon declare the ban on cannibalism to be racist.
Nice to see they’re thinking that people should eat ‘meat’, even if it’s human. That’s what us Low Carb / Keto people have been saying for years now - although obviously not human meat.
However, I think there motive is more sinister. Basically, they think they kill off two birds with one stone here. You kill humans and and feed their bodies to other humans. That way the ‘chosen’ humans the ‘meat’ they need, but you need far fewer livestock animals on the planet to feed them, thereby ending cow farting, and thus ending Global Warming.
One thing though, the timing...they’re starting to squeeze together their agenda items. I would have expected them to finish getting pedophilia legalized before taking this next, logical, step (for them).
+1
Exactly what was going on at Epstein's island?
I would be in favor of this as long as it was limited to liberals eating liberals.
Does this mean better halves cannot nibble each other ???
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_Green
Already been done
Liberalism is a mental illness.
The occurrence in the Andes involved rugby players, though, so no one was surprised.
[Restaurant scene] “Table of four, for the Donner party.”
We know what was going on at epstein island. It wasn’t spouses nibbling each other
Nibble, don’t chew
Soros advances by increments.
This is the latest.
While I'm at it, Jared and Neil are working hard to put the psycho back in psychology.
A slurp is good too
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.