“STOP LOSS” IN CIA(?)
In FESTIVAL OF LAST THREAD:
Bitt posted and texokie replied:
BITT:
Q Anon: 08/11/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.169, Q Day 653
8/14/2019, 10:50:59 PM · 1,711 of 1,893
To: TEXOKIE
@LongDefense
RUMORS FLYING:
Officers leaving from #CIA report an All Hands “stop loss” message received from the Director — the first anyone can recall, at least while the country not in active combat. Personnel loss has reached a critical stage.
@SaraCarterDC @FoxNews
1,691 posted on 08/14/2019 8:32:05 PM PDT by bitt (Age wrinkles the body. Quitting wrinkles the soul - Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1685 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
To: bitt
re: the ‘stop loss’
https://twitter.com/LongDefense/status/1161802126688948224
1,695 posted on 08/14/2019 8:33:22 PM PDT by bitt (Age wrinkles the body. Quitting wrinkles the soul - Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1691 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thank you, bitt. I don’t understand what it all means. I hope someone with some insight into this will be willing to enlighten us a some.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1691 | View Replies
THEN, Bagster offered this:
Q Anon: 08/11/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.169, Q Day 653
8/15/2019, 12:11:27 AM · 1,751 of 1,893
bagster to TEXOKIE; bitt
“Officers leaving from #CIA report an All Hands “stop loss” message received from the Director — the first anyone can recall, at least while the country not in active combat. Personnel loss has reached a critical stage. @SaraCarterDC @FoxNews”
Considering that CIA is the enemy, I consider this a good thing.
CIA ‘personnel loss’ seems to me like derp removal.
Haspell cleaning house?
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1711 | View Replies
And texokie replied:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
That makes sense. Oh, I hope that is what it means!....but I was unable to find a source explaining what an all hands “stop loss is exactly in this context.
Leaving it for the night shift! Nite all!
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1751 | View Replies
Bagster responded:
Q Anon: 08/11/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.169, Q Day 653
8/15/2019, 12:38:35 AM · 1,763 of 1,893
bagster to TEXOKIE
“I was unable to find a source explaining what an all hands “stop loss is exactly in this context.”
I’m more concerned with the words ‘personnel loss’.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1761 | View Replies
...THEN OTHER FREEQS WITH EXCELLENT KNOWLEDGE SUPPLIED THE MISSING PIECES:
Reed13k contributed this:
Q Anon: 08/11/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.169, Q Day 653
8/15/2019, 12:52:15 AM · 1,766 of 1,893
reed13k to TEXOKIE; bagster; bitt
In the military “stop loss” meant they could keep personnel beyond their commitments until such time as the “crisis” passed.
I’m guessing they have had so many people trying to get out of dodge that they are saying “hold your horses, we’ve got critical ops to run”.
Using it as an excuse to retain those who might otherwise vanish. Plus it’s only been discussed for the CIA not for any other agency. Option 2, as discussed, is they are taking so many into custody that they can’t afford to lose more.
Far as I know the Stop Loss entered on the military services after 9-11 was lifted and there isn’t one active now.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1761 | View Replies
TYPELOUDER WENT TO THE ORIGINAL TWEET AND WAS ABLE TO FIND THIS CLARIFICATION:
Q Anon: 08/11/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.169, Q Day 653
8/15/2019, 5:40:07 AM · 1,785 of 1,893
Typelouder to TEXOKIE
From @longdefense twitter:
“My apology. Misleading here, but used by some in Gov’t when it “freezes” early retirements/buy-outs, or slows departures, e.g in military when personnel are “involuntarily” retained beyond their legal obligation. Tech not applicable to CIA/enforceable; but rumors a VERY bad sign”
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1711 | View Replies
ICHABOD1 OFFERED A VERY CLEAR EXPLANATION OF WHAT A “STOP LOSS” IN THE MILITARY - AND PRESUMABLY IN THE CIA MEANS:
Q Anon: 08/11/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.169, Q Day 653
8/15/2019, 9:39:50 AM · 1,829 of 1,893
ichabod1 to TEXOKIE
In the military, if too many people are retiring/quitting/walking away they can issue orders called Stop Loss orders that suspend all or part of the normal discharge process. In other words, if they don’t have enough people, they don’t have to let you quit.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1761 | View Replies
LONE PALM GAVE US THE BENEFIT OF HIS INSIGHT:
Q Anon: 08/11/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.169, Q Day 653
8/15/2019, 10:59:56 AM · 1,863 of 1,893
LonePalm to reed13k; TEXOKIE; bagster; bitt
The services can, and do, use limited “stop loss” orders for critical specialties.
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours! (Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1766 | View Replies
MANY THANKS TO ALL OF YOU FOR HELPING ME UNDERSTAND THAT INITIAL POST BY BITT ABOUT “STOP LOSS!”
Really still now wondering if the rumor is true, and all the implications it might mean!
Our local server is running like molasses today. I’ll be planning on doing drive by posting from time to time. Thanks for all that you FReeQs are doing!
Thanks for bringing this over from the last thread. I was just wondering if a FedGov department loses a certain percentage of employees, a stop-loss is automatically triggered.
If that is the case, it's good news they are probably being dismantled like JFK promised, and President Trump is delivering.
CGato
So pondering the all Hands “stop loss” a bit gets me thinking...
So as a Employee they are required to answer questions.
If they don’t they risk their bennies if fired.
Once a retired private citizen, they can clam up and take the 5th.