Replies

FReeQs,

Apologies for my hasty post yesterday (and PM that I sent to some of you). I was short on time (AFK the rest of the day) and should have been more careful before I posted.

For the record, my position on Israel is this: Very pro-Israel as long as they are not anti-USA. IMO Israel has a DS just as we do. So they have bad actors mixed in among the good just as we do.

I have no special insight into who is a good guy and who is a bad guy, but Ehud Barack appears to be dirty based on recent Epstein info. I’m biased in favor of Netanyahu, think he’s a good guy.

Also for the record, I’m pretty sure that intel agencies worldwide are corrupted and I’m distrustful of all of them. That includes MOS. Do any of them have good people working for them? I’m assuming they all do. I’m assuming that the basic problem is that the executive levels are corrupt, that those not in the “inner circle” are being used.

As with many in our own country, it will not surprise me to be surprised (!) to find out that certain people I thought were derps were not and certain people I thought were good guys were derps.

Before Q, when faced with things that didn’t add up (especially with people I thought were conservative politicians/appointees who did things that looked questionable to me), I *ASSUMED* that it was because people who were higher up had more info than I did and that if I knew what they knew that I would understand the reason for the decisions they made and the things they did that were cognitively dissonant.

Now, in the Q era, I don’t easily give anyone a pass. I don’t expect to understand every single thing right this minute, but I DO expect everything to be explained eventually. In a reasonable amount of time. For example, saying that the truth about the JFK assassination (or any controversial event. Pick your favorite.) is too explosive for the public to know, is BS. It might be 5% damaging to the public psyche, but it’s 95% damaging to the continued control of the DS, to their reputations, to their life outside of prison, to their fortunes.

My view is that the American public could handle ANY truth about who shot JFK (or whatever) and still function. For the vast majority of people, they might be shocked to find out the truth is not the lie they’ve been fed, but it would have no direct bearing on them personally. They will still get up in the morning and go to work, raise their families, attend church/synagogue, play sports, go to movies, mow the lawn, take the kids to piano lessons, etc. The truth about JFK (etc) is not going to change that. It is a conceit of the “elite” that we couldn’t handle it, or that it would be devastating to us, or that it would be much of anything more than a small blip in our lives.

The much bigger effect on our lives will not be the truth about any particular event or “fact”. The bigger effect will be learning that we’ve been lied to about everything. Or at least about so many things. That will be a shake up. But even with that, we’ll go to work, raise families, all those things. We just won’t be so blindly trusting of “authority”.

JMO

There still may be nuggets of good information among the chaff in a couple of my recent posts, but I won’t defend them as a whole.

So thanks to all who raised issues, especially those who pointed out specific errors. Much appreciated. I’ll try to be more careful and not so hasty to post.

Thank you for your well-considered comments.

There is a particular book I would encourage all those who find comments such as yours engaging, to read. That book is "Everything You Know is (Still) Wrong." There are two main publications dates, with the latter one adding the word "Still." That edition of the book was published after the author's death, but which incorporated many of his post-first edition notes for that an intended second edition, which found fulfillment by the author's wife and daughter. (They did a good job, IMHO!) I don't think anyone can go wrong reading the book, unless you really just want to "take the blue pill (a reference from the movie, "The Matrix") and just keep taking the kids to their soccer and piano lessons.

I was spurred by this comment of yours: "It is a conceit of the “elite” that we couldn’t handle it."

I partly agree with your comment, but mostly that it is what those elite typically might say. Like, you I think they're wrong. But I differ with you as to just how they are wrong. My version would add that 1) they want the "can't handle it" answer to restrain us, true or not, and 2) they're correct in that many of us won't be able to handle the answers, and 3) most of those who won't be able to handle the answers will essentially demand the perpetrators' heads on pikes.

Unfortunately, as shocking as it sounds, the actual efforts to get those heads on pikes will likely ultimately lead to such dramatically changes in society (in a massive snowball effect that will likely be punctuated by horrific retribution the world has never seen on such a scale) that it will ultimately possibly prove that we couldn't absorb the truth peacefully," thus, in a practical sense, "We couldn't handle it."

But not handling it and doing something about it, that is, throwing off the yoke of oppression oxymoronically could very well turn out to be the best--or horrifically, the least-bad--choice.

Behind the Oz curtain, there really is a (figurative) wizard--ok, several wizards--who is/are the caretaker(s) of Oz, not Kansas (remember Q's statement about that).

The Oz wizard imagines that he rules the world. (He can seem and humble and genteel as Frank Morgan (no relation to Harry Morgan) in the movie, but that's just "his" "game face."

Spoils and homage come back to Oz from virtually all the countries of Earth. Oz has rigged essentially every major game out there. The stock markets are theirs. To the extent Average Joes are playing that game is the extent they want Average Joes to be participating with their money. Oz will determine the winners and many losers, mostly through insider trading.

Barry, who showed his disregard for the US Constitution (contrary to his oath (via taqiyyah)) by tipping the government's hand through references to his "czars". Those czars were (sometimes) allowed cross-agency authorities at odds with what many laws and policies had previously established.

Those elites and czars in our government are concentrated among something established during Jimma Cahtuh's Administration, known as the Senior Executive Service or SES. As needed, Barry wrote Executive Orders and Presidential Directives to let his handlers accomplish what they felt they needed often through the SES.

Barry, by the way, is not the first Clown in America to be President, as most thoughtful people would have realized by now. Think GHWB for starters, but he's not the only one.

The Clowns in America are not the only Clowns. We've here referred to "Deep State" with occasional references to other countries having their own Deep State. This is a reasonable way to look at it, if we always realize Oz considers itself in charge and not easily subject to any given country's laws (think "our" DOJ not going after Hillary, Abedin, Combetta or Mifsud).

Oz (generally (no offense)) worships Satan. They enjoy their wizardry and that they can keep many things from Kansas-type folk, particularly (only by way of example) all the best inventions (think Area 51 and Section 4) since "our" Patent Office is controlled by SERCO, a British company.

Most of the best magicians are from Oz.

Oz has 13 families. They believe their bloodlines ostensibly go back to the Biblical Cain, who slew Abel. They believe (by rewriting the Biblical story of Adam and Eve's children) that the serpent in the garden had sex with Eve to conceive Cain. and Abel was conceived between Adam and Eve. There is some evidence that Cain's (claimed) descendants' blood (DNA) is different from Seth's descendants, but some of that is said to be detectable (by Kansas' medical equipment) only during certain planetary events. Genesis 7:22 says implicitly that only Seth's descendants (Noah) survived, but the 13-family bloodlines have "other versions" of the story (basically that their line was preserved (perhaps because some of Cain's line were not moving on the Earth, but elsewhere) through that time).

Whether there are falsehoods among the things believed by the 13 families (there may be several such things) does not completely undo the fact that they believe and act as if those things are true. Yes, there is hubris (see GIF of Peter Strzok) among the Satanists.

Satanists work more diligently than even the American Kennel Club to keep track their bloodlines. That's made even more difficult because their beliefs has them "sowing their seed with gay abandon--and straight. There are multiple, simultaneous games to help their spawn (as if they were checkerboard moves) achieve powerful heights of position, not nearly so much through merit as through manipulation. (Think of the Mortimer and Randolph Duke characters in the movie "Trading Places.") Then, the $1 bets that would have us all frustrated.

Oz has an insatiable appetite for child sex trafficking. One of their favorite ways to sate that is through wars and disasters that leave so many orphaned, lost, or with a single parent or relatives that are happy to see a "relief agency" give their child a better life. Partly through the degeneracy of the activities related to those circumstances, many of those "people [become or] are sick," to quote Q (Think Hollywood, e.g., Weinstein, Lucas, Hanks, Streep, Spielberg--all only allegedly, of course).

So there may be a million "people" or so in the bloodline families that have racked up quite a lot of (what they consider) "bad karma." There's lots of sickness, sin and need for a Savior.

But a million people should be no match for a fair fight against 7.5 billion. But who said they're looking for a fair fight? They've been buying the loyalty of all kinds of minions for a long time. They'll have goon squads of MS-13 and illegal aliens and Middle East sleeper cells taking out quite a few of us under certain circumstances. We may even yet experience even American military troops firing on innocent civilians because they will given "illegal orders" by those from the bloodline families.

Such thinking is very much like MK-ULTRA, through which (disclosed in the 1975 Church hearings) in which the intel agency elites and SES have triggered many mass shooters.

They've thought through their long-term game plan very thoroughly and these days, they have Google, Facebook, and AI software wizardry up the wazoo, not to mention functional control of much of the world's most destructive arsenals. Protection for themselves includes well-stocked, 5-star subterranean bunkers for very large contingents of them, to avoid possible surface destruction for many years.

It wouldn't easily be a 7.5 billion-to-one million kind of fight in any literal sense of that comparison. So, "could we handle it?" I pray we could, but we'd likely never be the same again.