Skip to comments.
ACLU: Facial Recognition Software Mistook 1 in 5 California Lawmakers for Criminals
KTLA ^
Posted on 08/13/2019 1:46:28 PM PDT by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
08/13/2019 1:46:28 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Faulty, no doubt. I would expect a much higher ratio.
2
posted on
08/13/2019 1:47:29 PM PDT
by
bk1000
(I stand with Trump)
To: BenLurkin
How did it miss the other 80%?
3
posted on
08/13/2019 1:47:32 PM PDT
by
Stosh
To: BenLurkin
20% accuracy rate is disappointing.
To: BenLurkin
Doesnt sound like a mistake to me. Im surprised it wasnt 3 out of 5.
L
5
posted on
08/13/2019 1:47:39 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
To: BenLurkin
Legislators....
Now use it on all the attorneys.
To: BenLurkin
“Mistook” or “correctly identified”?
7
posted on
08/13/2019 1:48:47 PM PDT
by
trublu
To: BenLurkin
8
posted on
08/13/2019 1:48:52 PM PDT
by
alternatives?
(Why have an army if there are no borders?)
To: bk1000
I was thinking the same thing. Sounds like some “back to the drawing board” is called for.
9
posted on
08/13/2019 1:48:56 PM PDT
by
Howie66
("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
To: Lurker
Yeah, sounds like it worked perfectly.
To: BenLurkin
Since the aclu has been working against us for the past 25 years, I find anything they say as suspect, that is, there must be an ulterior motive.
11
posted on
08/13/2019 1:49:34 PM PDT
by
MichaelCorleone
(Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
To: Lurker
That’s the ratio of Dems in office right? and the AI made a mistake then..
12
posted on
08/13/2019 1:50:26 PM PDT
by
max americana
(Fired ONE libtard at work at every election since 2008 because I enjoy it. I hope every lib die.)
To: BenLurkin
20% accuracy is pretty poor
13
posted on
08/13/2019 1:53:52 PM PDT
by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: BenLurkin
I’m surprised this gem from Twain hasn’t been posted yet.
“There is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.”
14
posted on
08/13/2019 1:54:28 PM PDT
by
Hieronymus
("I shall drink--to the Pope, if you please,-still, to Conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.")
To: bk1000
Damn. The software missed 4 out 5 criminals?
15
posted on
08/13/2019 1:56:53 PM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(The democrats' national goal: One world social-communism under one world religion: Atheistic Islam.)
To: Hieronymus
16
posted on
08/13/2019 1:59:37 PM PDT
by
karnage
To: BenLurkin
Retired politician Henry Waxman is actually immune to all facial recognition technology because his face doesn’t register as being within human parameters.
Freegard
17
posted on
08/13/2019 1:59:42 PM PDT
by
Ransomed
To: BenLurkin
The software is pretty inadequate. It missed 70-75% of them.
18
posted on
08/13/2019 1:59:47 PM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
To: Stosh
Unless rewritten, the headline may also imply that the other 80% were not MISTAKEN for criminals, but were properly IDENTIFIED as such!
To: BenLurkin
20
posted on
08/13/2019 2:01:35 PM PDT
by
stevem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson