1 posted on
08/13/2019 1:46:28 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: BenLurkin
Faulty, no doubt. I would expect a much higher ratio.
2 posted on
08/13/2019 1:47:29 PM PDT by
bk1000
(I stand with Trump)
To: BenLurkin
How did it miss the other 80%?
3 posted on
08/13/2019 1:47:32 PM PDT by
Stosh
To: BenLurkin
20% accuracy rate is disappointing.
To: BenLurkin
Doesn’t sound like a mistake to me. I’m surprised it wasn’t 3 out of 5.
L
5 posted on
08/13/2019 1:47:39 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
To: BenLurkin
Legislators....
Now use it on all the attorneys.
To: BenLurkin
“Mistook” or “correctly identified”?
7 posted on
08/13/2019 1:48:47 PM PDT by
trublu
To: BenLurkin
8 posted on
08/13/2019 1:48:52 PM PDT by
alternatives?
(Why have an army if there are no borders?)
To: BenLurkin
Since the aclu has been working against us for the past 25 years, I find anything they say as suspect, that is, there must be an ulterior motive.
11 posted on
08/13/2019 1:49:34 PM PDT by
MichaelCorleone
(Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
To: BenLurkin
20% accuracy is pretty poor
13 posted on
08/13/2019 1:53:52 PM PDT by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: BenLurkin
I’m surprised this gem from Twain hasn’t been posted yet.
“There is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.”
14 posted on
08/13/2019 1:54:28 PM PDT by
Hieronymus
("I shall drink--to the Pope, if you please,-still, to Conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.")
To: BenLurkin
Retired politician Henry Waxman is actually immune to all facial recognition technology because his face doesn’t register as being within human parameters.
Freegard
17 posted on
08/13/2019 1:59:42 PM PDT by
Ransomed
To: BenLurkin
The software is pretty inadequate. It missed 70-75% of them.
18 posted on
08/13/2019 1:59:47 PM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
To: BenLurkin
20 posted on
08/13/2019 2:01:35 PM PDT by
stevem
To: BenLurkin
21 posted on
08/13/2019 2:02:15 PM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: BenLurkin
Here’s a question: WHOSE facial recognition software did they use?
I’m going to guess the ACLU spent some time finding the software with the worst false-positive rate.
22 posted on
08/13/2019 2:03:53 PM PDT by
SauronOfMordor
(Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
To: BenLurkin
Of coarse its wrong all 5 are criminals you can bet
To: BenLurkin
24 posted on
08/13/2019 2:11:36 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
To: BenLurkin
Looks like the software worked very well!
25 posted on
08/13/2019 2:23:01 PM PDT by
I want the USA back
(The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
To: BenLurkin
Who said the software was incorrect? Sounds to me like it was really working correctly. Maybe if they tighten up the algorithm they might have gotten to 100%. Sounds like we have some pretty good ways to officially name the crooks as to who they really are.
26 posted on
08/13/2019 2:30:28 PM PDT by
dirtymac
(Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country! Now)
To: BenLurkin
If: CA legis-critter, Then: criminal of the highest order.
No ifs, ands, or BUTTS about it.
27 posted on
08/13/2019 2:31:35 PM PDT by
Da Coyote
(eh)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson