
Oh wait. Maybe not.
big deal, my wife can do that...!!!.
Hell, I go to bed at night and can still hear my ex wife.

I only think to myself in Chuukese, a language that less than 50,000 people in the world speak.
“Let me get this straight. You want to sweep with me??”
One more step.
No Orwell there, right?
Can it tell me why did I go to my basement or why did I open up the fridge??
Google already knows what you want to search for before you start typing. Alexa calls 911 if she deems it necessary. Your phone tells the NSA where you are. Your car can rat your driving to the insurance company.
No thanks.
So how in the world do vocal cords decided to ignore what the brain is commanding them to do? Why would the brain send commands to a part of the body that should ignore those commands?
"OK, vocal cords, here's a command for you, but I also command you ignore it."Seems like that would really confuse the vocal cords.
Wouldn't it be easier for the brain to not send the signal in the first place? This doesn't add up. Maybe something was lost in translation by an ignorant "journalist."
It will be cool if you can record your dreams.
Coming soon to an airport and government building, near you!
It also works for when she has to go outside. No doubt about it, she's a great communicator...lol.
I just got off the phone with the service manager who told that my vehicle still isn’t ready. If I had been wearing this device, he would have heard something a lot different than the civil voice I was using.
Talking to yourself is fine...
Answering yourself is fine...
The problem is when you respond, Im sorry, what did you say?
Will be great for interrogations...So much for the right to remain silent...
Prosecutor:
AlterEgo testified specifically and emphatically that you threatened to douse an honorable ranking elected Democratic public servant with a deluge of an hundred milkshakes. What do you have to say for yourself now?
Defendant:
I never sub-vocalized that to myself!
Prosecutor:
Your Honor, I move to have that response stricken from the record, as non-verifiable non-hearsay!
Judge:
Objection sustained. In light of this obvious future thought crime, we find the defendant guilty as charged.
[ This Device Can Hear You Talking to Yourself ]
Terri Schiavo was unavailable for thought-comment.