Posted on 07/27/2019 12:10:50 AM PDT by Oscar in Batangas
Clinton Yates, a columnist for The Undefeated and a panelist for ESPN, became angry when a male flight attendant addressed him by his name. The employee apparently used flight info to try to greet all passengers by their names. And no, not just the lucky ducks in first class who get the warm lemon-y towels and warm chocolate chip cookies. But also the masses,
...
And then, Yeesh. I feel bad for all these people whose names were just put on blast for no reason.
Is your name put on blast when an Airlines employee says hello?
Soon Yates began fighting with a male follower who couldnt understand what his problem was.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Well NOW I know he’s “being PROFILED”.
One should never engage a silverback
Have 90% of blacks lost their minds and souls?
I guess he didn’t like being outed. Never heard of him.
I thought he was one of the few normal ones on ESPN!
Not as bad as United’s goof way back when. They had a ‘Take Me With You’ program’ where wives flew free. As part of the promo, flowers were sent to the wives after the flight with a thank you note. Many wives complained they got flowers but didn’t take any flight with their husbands..
‘....creeped out if I were welcomed with my name. ‘
Steve Martin joked he would ride ski lifts with strangers and see their names on their skis then pretend he knew them. Hey Jones, long time no see!
Once he did that with a guy named ‘Rental’.
Clinton Yates, never heard of her. Is she related to Bill Clinton?
Called out for traveling while black?
What a maroon...
Hahaha.. I suspect the person who suggested the airlines send flowers to the wives knew some of the husbands would be busted.
They publicly shamed him.
Who? Never heard of her
The other thing most people don’t realize is that Airplanes are dictatorships.
The pilot and his minions are in charge. What the pilot says, goes. End of story.
If he wants you off, you are off. I don’t care if you are a TRANS-POC, no amount of identity politics changes the fact that the pilot has final say.
I think thew queer made a scene for the advertising. That, and attention seeking is what homosexual do.
+1.
L
Don’t think so. I used to work for United and as I understood it,it came as a total surprise. Of course, once the complaints started coming in, it was like, ‘How could we have been so stupid?’ A side note: It was an extremely successful promo, money-wise.
Don’t think so. I used to work for United and as I understood it,it came as a total surprise. Of course, once the complaints started coming in, it was like, ‘How could we have been so stupid?’ A side note: It was an extremely successful promo, money-wise.
“Id be a bit surprised and maybe creeped out if I were welcomed with my name.”
It is startling to me also. On the other hand I’m able to realize that it’s not threatening and not worth bitching about to a national audience.
Now, if I walked into a Walmart, in a state I’ve never even visited before, and was greeted by name (and yes, that what technology can do now), that would freak me out (but also make it less likely for me to walk out without paying for stuff).
I have a voicemail app on my phone that addresses people by name....hello John, _____ can’t answer right now. It freaks people out. lol Yesterday my tech guy left me a message that said as he was laughing....I didn’t know voice mail could do that. It said my name, that is so cool!
It uses my contacts and if an unknown person calls that can be identified it actually identifies them.
No. But when there are no consequences for any form of outrageous actions and/or speech, they will become even more outrageous. Just as a child will test his/her boundaries.
The sad part is that WE, as a society, have given THEM, anyone with a perceived grievance, the tools that permit such behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.