Well, they can always inject it into oil producing areas to force out the oil I guess.
Burying a necessary plant nutrient where it cannot be used is not a good idea....................
A far greater crisis is our national loss of brain function.
Would burying all Leftists be enough?
In human history?!? Lying, hysterical hyperbole much?
We don’t need to bury carbon, we need to bury communists.
And how much will all of this cost taxpayers?
How dare you question such esteemed and wise scientist as AOC, Algore, and your betters?
The politicization of science for tax and spend schemes to allow the elite to better control our every activity will be a historical stain on our generation. Dare I say it, it may be viewed in the future as another flat earth idea.
CO2 is a vital component of a healthy planet and the fact that it is now generally considered to be a pollutant is frightening.
Trillions of tons of trace gas ,LOL it’s also colorless ,sounds like a Super Scam
This: By promoting techniques that increase the potential of agricultural land to suck in carbon, the backers of Indigo AG believe they can set the foundation for a major effort to stem climate change. On Wednesday, the company announced a new initiative with the ambitious goal of removing 1 trillion tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by paying farmers to modify their practices. “
Lib speak, farmers are too good at feeding the world, we have to curtail their prolific harvests so people starve.
Calm Down, Take another Pill, have another hit off that pipe, everything is going to be just fine....
They really are becoming downright ridiculous.
It just dawned on me, that’s why they hate prosperity! When life is good people want to have children.
“Environmental experts say the world is increasingly on a path toward a climate crisis.”
Well if environmental experts say so, then it must be true...
Unsubstantiated assumption.
- Cover crops
- Crop Rotation with animal use
- No till drilling
We already do this because we get better yields.
Not everyone of course - a lot of industrial farms don't ("Big Ag") but even they are coming around.
None of this has anything to do with "climate change".
This organization is co-opting current sustainable practices for their own tax money grab from a clueless government.
How much energy is needed for this harebrained scheme? Is that energy polluting?
Plant trees instead and ban slash and burn farming.
Foolishness
The planet is suffering from an EPOCH level drought of CO2!
Or, they could just wait a few more years and as the planet cools, due to increased cloud cover as a result of decreased solar activity, the oceans will reabsorb the excess CO2.
This is why I have never understood the supposed environmental reasons for recycling paper. Paper is not made from old growth forests. It is made from trees that are planted as a crop. The more paper that is consumed the more trees that are planted and the more carbon that is removed from the atmosphere and converted to paper.
If you bury used paper in landfills all of that carbon is removed from the atmosphere. If you recycle paper, less trees are planted and less carbon is removed from the atmosphere.