Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meghan Markle a no-show at banquet for Trump after ‘nasty’ comment
New York Post ^ | 06-03-19 | Mark Moore

Posted on 06/03/2019 4:15:52 PM PDT by Steve1999

Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, was a no-show at the Buckingham Palace banquet for President Trump’s state visit to England on Monday, after the president called the former American actress “nasty” in an interview with a British newspaper. Markle, who is married to Prince Harry, is on maternity leave after giving birth to their first child, Archie, earlier in May. Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge, the wife of Prince William, was in attendance at the banquet as were Trump’s adult children. The American-born Markle also missed a royal luncheon at the palace with Trump and first lady Melania Trump earlier Monday – although Harry attended.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: crazywomen; fakenews; markle; markmoore; meghanmarkle; nasty; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkcompost; newyorkpost; trump; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last
To: Steve1999

Did I just hear the Queen snickering?


121 posted on 06/03/2019 10:08:40 PM PDT by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Did she renounce her citizenship? As I understand it you have to specifically renounce your citizenship when you take another otherwise you are considered a dual national. A lot of Americans who take citizenship of another renounce American citizenship for tax reasons as unlike most citizenships, you are required to pay US tax even if you live and work in another country. Boris Johnson, our most likely next PM was a dual national until 3 years ago (born in NYC) and then gave it up. Presumably he did it because they conflicted with his political ambitions, its kind of awkward aspiring to be PM whilst not being a full and exclusive British citizen...


122 posted on 06/04/2019 3:15:24 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

Totally agree with you.

“All this piece of twice married gutter trash really is to Harry is a big F-U to all the royal conventions and expectations of him.”

But really, aren’t all the royals right up to the queen, just a bunch of trailer trash that have convinced the world that their ‘bloodline’ entitles them. What kind of people would have hung out with Jimmy Savile for decades? Could they possibly try to claim they didn’t know? Look at Andrew and all his trips to pedo island? They are evil.


123 posted on 06/04/2019 4:08:24 AM PDT by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Charles is a joke.


124 posted on 06/04/2019 4:41:30 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20

I do not expect her to be around in 5 years. Royal Divorce. I don’t think the Queen is too thrilled about her in general and now it came out that she blew $380K on her baby shower.


125 posted on 06/04/2019 5:04:30 AM PDT by Jimmy The Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steve1999

Trump is right. She was very nasty to him.

Her loss.


126 posted on 06/04/2019 7:44:14 AM PDT by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

Those people are correct.


127 posted on 06/04/2019 12:56:39 PM PDT by CrimsonTidegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Steve1999

More fake news, she wasn’t expected to be there.


128 posted on 06/04/2019 12:57:22 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
She was not going to attend anyway, due to maternity. Also, Trump did not call her nasty but said ‘she said something nasty about him.’

Of course, but apparently journalists cannot comprehend the English language and its use.

129 posted on 06/04/2019 12:58:58 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

Good question, although I’m not losing any sleep over it:)


130 posted on 06/04/2019 12:59:28 PM PDT by CrimsonTidegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson