Posted on 05/03/2019 2:26:06 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding mind control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of group-think), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ship) that provides the scattered (free thinkers) with a starter new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When non-dogmatic information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (group-think collective), and have free thought.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
DOJ to Nadler: Threaten Barr With Impeachment, You Get Nothing
Smart move by DOJ lawyers. The letter below informs Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler the previous report content was provided without assertion of executive privilege; however, if Nadler follows-through with impeachment plan, executive privilege is now enforced and the totality of the report is withdrawn from congress.
**************
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Legislative Affairs
Office of the Assistant Attorney General
Washington, D.C. 20530
May 7, 2019
The Honorable Jerrold Nadler
Chairman
Committee on the Judiciary
United States House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Chairman Nadler:
As you know, the Attorney General has repeatedly sought to accomodate the interests of the House Committee on the Judiciary in the investigation conducted by Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III. On April 18, 2019, the Attorney General voluntarily disclosed to Congress the Special Counsel’s report, which was intended to be “confidential” under the applicable regulations, with as few redactions as possible, consistent with the law and long-established confidentiality interests of the Executive Branch. He also made available to you and other congressional leaders a minimally redacted version of the report that excluded only
grand-jury information, which could not lawfully be shared with Congress. In response, you refused even to review the minimally redacted report, and you immediately served a subpoena, dated April 18, 2019, demanding production of the fully unredacted report and the Special Counsel’s entire investigative files, which consist of millions of pages of classified and unclassified documents, bearing upon more than two dozen criminal cases and investigations, many of which are ongoing.
Since then, the Department of Justice has offered further accommodations to the Committee. In particular, the Department offered to expand the number of staff members who may review the minimally redacted report; to allow Members of Congress who have reviewed the minimally redacted report to discuss the material freely among themselves; and to allow Members to take and retain their notes following their review. We expressed our hope that these further accommodations would prompt you and your colleagues actually to review the minimally redacted report, which would allow the parties to engage in meaningful discussions regarding
possible further accommodations of the Committee’s additional expansive requests. We further proposed a framework for those discussions, and made clear that we were open to conducting them on an expedited basis.
Unfortunately, the Committee has responded to our accommodation efforts by escalating its unreasonable demands and scheduling a committee vote to recommend that the Attorney General be held in contempt of Congress. In particular, the Committee has demanded that the Department authorize review of the minimally redacted report by all 41 members of the Committee, as well as all members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and additional staff members. As we have explained, however, doing so would force the Department to risk violating court orders and rules in multiple ongoing prosecutions, as well as risk the disclosure of information that could compromise ongoing investigations. In addition, you have demanded that the Department join in a request that a court grant the Committee access to grand-jury material protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(r), even though we have explained that such a request would force the Department to ignore existing law. Such unreasonable demands, together with the Committee’s precipitous threat to hold the Attorney General in contempt, are a transparent attempt to short-circuit the constitutionally mandated accommodation process and provoke an unnecessary conflict between our respective branches of government. They are also counterproductive. They will not further the Committee’s interests in obtaining the requested information.
In the face of the Committee’s threatened contempt vote, the Attorney General will be compelled to request that the President invoke executive privilege with respect to the materials subject to the subpoena. I hereby request that the Committee hold the subpoena in abeyance and delay any vote on whether to recommend a citation of contempt for noncompliance with the subpoena, pending the President’s determination of this question.
This request is consistent with long-standing policy of the Executive Branch about congressional requests for information implicating executive privilege. See President Ronald Reagan, Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, Procedures Governing Responses to Congressional Requests for Information 2 (Nov. 4, 1982) (directing executive agencies to “request the Congressional body to hold its request for the information in abeyance” in order to “protect the privilege pending a Presidential decision”). Regrettably, the Committee has made this request necessary by threatening to pretermit the constitutionally mandated accommodation process between the branches and to hold a vote on contempt tomorrow morning.
This request is not itself an assertion of executive privilege. If the Committee decides to proceed in spite of this request, however, the Attorney General will advise the President to make a protective assertion of executive privilege over the subpoenaed material, which undoubtedly includes material covered by executive privilege. President Clinton, acting on the advice of Attorney General Janet Reno, made such a protective assertion of privilege in similar circumstances. See Protective Assertion of Executive Privilege Regarding White House Counsel’s Office Documents, 20 Op. O.L.C. 1(1996). We remain open to further discussions with the Committee, and we hope that the Committee does not make it necessary for the President to take that step tomorrow.
Sincerely,
Stephen E. Boyd
Assistant Attorney General
cc: The Honorable Doug Collins
Ranking Member
**************
The only thing AG Barr was statutorily required to provide was the four-page summary letter he already presented. Asking President Trump to throw the executive privilege blanket over the full work product effectively shields it from congressional review; AND simultaneously blocks congress from proceeding with any impeachment action.
The assertion of executive privilege effectively removes any lack of production action (ie. the impeachment threat) by Chairman Jerry Nadler.
Essentially AG Barr et al is going old school with classic separation of power. POTUS Trump built a bridge from executive to legislative branch with voluntary production; however, if Nadler wants to be a resistance member then the executive branch will pull back and the customary three-branch separation of power rules will be the standard form of engagement.
Smart play.
Tuesday, May 7, 2019 (Halifax, NS) -- Media are invited to Dalhousie University’s inaugural Alumni Days Open Dialogue Series where former American intelligence officer and whistleblower Edward Snowden will deliver a keynote address.
On May 30, Mr. Snowden will appear live via livestream from Moscow, Russia to speak about security, privacy and surveillance to a Dalhousie community audience. Mr. Snowden will also take questions from students. The event will be moderated by Dr. Frank Harvey, Dean of Dalhousie’s Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.
The Snowden keynote kicks off Dalhousie’s Open Dialogue Series which brings people together for thought-provoking conversations focused on timely and relevant topics. In addition to conversation about security, privacy and surveillance with Mr. Snowden, Open Dialogue will feature two panel discussions with faculty, researchers and alumni delivering TED-style talks about healthcare and immigration.
Interview opportunities: Sheila Blair-Reid, Assistant Vice-President, Alumni and External Engagement. Dr. Frank Harvey (event moderator) and Robert Tibbo, Mr. Snowden’s legal counsel.
The keynote address is sponsored in part by Ernst and Young LLP (EY Canada), Atlantic Security Conference and Dalhousie's Faculties of Law, Management, Computer Science, and Arts and Social Sciences.
Event details:
· Date/time: May 30, 2019 | 7:20 PM. Doors open 6:45 PM.
· Location: McInnes Room, Dalhousie Student Union Building (overflow: Ondaatje Hall, McCain Building)
· Tickets are free with contribution to For the Refugees: Online registration is required. http://ow.ly/z4Fm50u1LIv
· Livestream link for media to follow (details not for publication)
· Media: Photography is permitted, though video and audio recordings are not.
Media are asked to please RSVP.
Media contact
Sarah Dawson
Senior Communications Advisor
Dalhousie University
sarah.dawson@dal.ca
902-266-7449
Thank you, will read carefully tomorrow. No way Trump will let these criminals and traitors slide.
I caught the ‘key witness’ part but missed the ‘14 grand jury investigations’ when I heard it live, but she was tough to listen to, so rude....
gisd O
.
No kidding. And still listed on the board are Clare Bronfman and Nancy Salzman and three others. The NXIVM corporation is still viable and we'll have to watch the trial to see if they if they will assert attorney-client privilege, which they've indicated they might do.
I can't imagine, if they try that, the judge will be sympathetic when sentencing comes around.
Clare and Nancy's deals were really light. A year or two in Camp Federal, or nothing at all.
On the other hand, the judge has it in his hands to sentence them to much longer times, on the order of 10-15 years. If they get into that category, they're not going to Club Fed. They're automatically placed in a hardcore prison. In that case, if they're lucky, they'll go to one of six Federal sex-offender prisons.
Can you imagine ten years in the women's wing of a Federal sex-offender prison?
We'll see.
I can't wait for my next NXIVM update!
At the end of the day, lead attorney for the defense presented the judge with motion for mistrial. Evidently, during the testimony of the first prosecution witness, Sylvie Lloyd, she mentioned the last name of another person affiliated with NXIVM.
Mark Agnifilio has asked the judge to declare a mistrial since the judge's own order said witnesses are protected from having their last names mentioned. Ain't that a peach?
The judge will hold a hearing tomorrow, Wednesday, at 9am EDT to decide on a mistrial. Judge Garaufis told the defense that if a mistrial was declared, the next court date would be September at the earliest. Agnifilio said he was fine that.
That would mean the Vanguard, Keith Raniere would stew in the Manhattan Federal lockup until then.
I don't think the judge will declare a mistrial based on a slip of the tongue of the FIRST witness. Jeez. We'll see. But now we have a glimpse of the defense's strategy, paid for we assume by Clare Bronfman. She got off with money, why shouldn't she pay to get Raniere off with just more money on technicalities? She's paying for his lawyer anyway.
+++ NXIVM Ping List +++
Ask me to be dropped or added
Thanks for posting that, it’s very well written.
-SB
In terms of chess: “Check.”
This is basically the Democrats trying to see what cards Trump is holding. They want access to information the DOJ cannot legally give them. They have no legal standing.
-SB
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fboLAx01zg&feature=youtu.be
Senator Harris Misses Huge Revelation From Barr During Senate Testimony 14 MIN
https://twitter.com/jabeale/status/1125786062209654784
CERNOVICH:
School shooter
- account shared a video of Seth Meyers attacking President Trump
- shared an Occupy Democrats post praising then President Barack Obama
- hated Christians
Far left wing terrorism is a huge threat.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/may/7/devon-erickson-identified-stem-school-highlands-ra/
~~~~~~~~~
I did -- and -- I did: (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3746713/posts?page=1029#1029)
~~~~~~~~~
Since-reinforced conclusion:
TXnMA
(Shadowbanned?)
Well this is bound to go down the memory hole unless they can do a quick scrubbing and make up a more suitable profile.
Probably won’t take them long.
BLACK OP SITES BEING DISMANTLED - WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
and the Lincoln to the Gulf is a message to the ONE ? who dat? Ohumma?
NXIVM update.
Click on this twitter link for a reporter who is posting updates on the trial. No electronic devices are allowed in the courtroom, but she’s taking notes and posts on breaks.
https://twitter.com/AylaFerrone?lang=en
Here is the morning thread on unroll. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1125820525153005573.html
Here are the afternoon postings https://twitter.com/AylaFerrone/status/1125901697144979457
Too many threads to post. Just reading notes on Sylvie’s testimony is compelling. The reporter has to break down the threads into bite sized pieces on twitter.
Sylvie Lloyd says she was brought back into anorexia going down to 90 pounds for Vanguard, then being subjected to daily weigh ins to get her back to 100. So much that she couldn’t go home for Christmas with family because Bronfman, Salzman and Raniere required her daily weigh ins.
She slept on the floor of Clare Bronfman’s room during this time.
Check the links. The trial testimony will be disturbing, so don’t click if you need the fainting couch.
Wow, I somehow came across this while digging. It’s General Mike Flynn on what Hillary really did in Libya, from October of 2016.
-SB
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.