Posted on 04/28/2019 3:39:24 PM PDT by rickmichaels
Democrat Illinois state Rep. Dianne Pappas believes that the answer to preventing abortions is that men should be castrated and charged to store their sperm. Pappas had met with pro-life critics of the Reproductive Health Act, one of whom recounted the meeting and her statements on the Wayne Township Republican website.
We tried to keep politics out of this equation, as we were here to represent the parish members for Pro-Life. I personally, introduced myself as a business owner, who is a licensed insurance agent. Two minutes into the discussion, she revealed her views on the topic and how we wont be able to change her mind, Jackie Hayden wrote.
Her eyes connected with mine and she said, You know ladies, with technology the way it is, we wouldnt have an abortion problem if we applied a plan. Now, Ive been told its a bit radical, but if we allowed men to be castrated, took the sperm to the bank, collected tax dollars on it for storage, then when its time, to have the man decide hes ready to begin a family . well then problem is solved!'
This is reportedly the second time that Pappas has suggested this absurd plan to pro-life constituents.
Frederick Douglass Foundation president, and speaker for the National Black Pro-Life Coalition, Babette Holder is now calling for Pappas to be formally disciplined.
She needs to be censored, Holder told the DuPage Policy Journal. What she said is every bit as bad as what Rep. [Stephanie] Kifowit talked about when she spoke of brewing up a Legionnaires potion for then Rep. Peter Breen. There needs to be accountability when you make these kinds of statements and youre supposed to be a public servant.
The bill that was being discussed would prohibit the state from interfering in any way with abortions. It would erase criminal penalties for performing abortions and allow non-doctors to do them. The legislation also would repeal the partial-birth abortion ban, abortion clinic regulations and conscience protections for medical workers, according to a report from Life News.
Drugged, brainwashed, ruined. It was done to her yet she is responsible (thats life.)
These demons believe they are smart and righteous, equal and appropriate for authority.
What are you going to do, Earthlings?
Anyone who does her should be.
She is going way over the top, trying to make her point, by exaggeration
Exactly I had already figured that before I saw the pic....
Oh goodie...another 2020 demonrat candidate....
Not even with your dog’s ...
Sad to say, she is ‘following’ one of my suggestions...
When a gun grabber says that taking MY gun away from me will help stop gun violence, I retort with
‘If that is so, wouldn’t cutting off your tallywacker cut down on rapes and sexual assaults’
STOCK ANSWER
‘Harumph, I have NEVER sexually assaulted or raped anyone so you are being ridiculous’
ME:
“I would imagine you probably have been closer to being charged with some sort of sex crime than I have in regards to a gun”
I would move to a hilltop monastery in Italy before I would ever go within one hundred miles of that butt ugly lard a**.
Damn feminists.
Democrats - The Party of Death and Taxes.
Mad because her mother didn’t have an abortion.
It only takes one.
Her logic implies that most abortions are done as a result of women having unprotected consensual sex. She seems to believe that women are incapable of being responsible for their own lives and reproduction and must depend only on men for their happiness and success in life. This proposal seems to be a step back in feminist rights rather than forward.
I see they had a sale on men’s undershirts.
She reminds me of the slob that defended the blind sheik back in the 90’s.
She’s just jealous that she’s never ever had one.
I would like to see that one eat a meal. Kind of like watching an anaconda eat a pig.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.