Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Theresa May finally calls it what it is!
16/03/19 | Phil.K

Posted on 03/15/2019 5:59:16 PM PDT by Jakarta ex-pat

"There can be no place in our societies for the vile ideology that drives and incites hatred and fear."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Speaking today in regards to the Christchurch Massacre, Theresa May finally used words which call out The Vile Ideology that drives and incites hatred and fear!"
1 posted on 03/15/2019 5:59:16 PM PDT by Jakarta ex-pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat

I won’t type what I said out loud when I read this.

But Jim could set up a penalty fee for using a bad word.

It would bring in more donations and sometimes one is JUST CALLED FOR WHEN THE PERSON IS A MONSTER TRYING TO DESTROY THE WEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


2 posted on 03/15/2019 6:01:44 PM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat
Psst... Theresa... when you say "Vile Ideology that incites hatred and fear", you'd be talking about Islam, right???

Just wondering...

3 posted on 03/15/2019 6:04:23 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat

She didnt explicitly name it. Vague on purpose as to be used against more than just the actual group causing the real problems, islam.


4 posted on 03/15/2019 6:06:43 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat; All

As a woman who has been in her share of leadership positions through the years, these ‘women’ leading actual COUNTRIES are just flat-out CLUELESS and DANGEROUS in so many ways!

And that includes a good chunk of our own CongressFems, too, obviously!

What do you call ‘The Peter Principle’ as applied to women?

*SMIRK*


5 posted on 03/15/2019 6:12:23 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin ( "Why can't you be more like Lloyd Braun?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Why does the UK have to pay a penny to exit ?


6 posted on 03/15/2019 6:13:56 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat

And? she’s still an NWO muppet who STILL wants the UK to be part of the EU. Pathetic.


7 posted on 03/15/2019 6:14:32 PM PDT by max americana (Fired libtards at our company for the past 12 yrs at every election. I hope all liberals die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

The “Peter Principle” is named for Dr. Laurence J Peter, who first formulated it.

I think we can call it the Peter Principle, regardless of whether we apply it to male or female examples of incompetence.

I can’t imagine what you were thinking ...

;’}


8 posted on 03/15/2019 6:16:17 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I would call them latent suicides. Theresa May, Angela Merkel, childless with no concern for their own progeny or that of their countrymen. They know they are dead-enders and want to take their countries with them.


9 posted on 03/15/2019 6:29:00 PM PDT by Kickaha (See the glory...of the royal scam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kickaha

And being childless is… bad?


10 posted on 03/15/2019 6:39:50 PM PDT by Simon Green ("Arm your daughter, sir, and pay no attention to petty bureaucrats.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

Moslems always get a pass
They are special when it comes to mass bloodletting


11 posted on 03/15/2019 6:49:27 PM PDT by whistleduck (arpoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green
And being childless is… bad?

Imagine if everybody did it.

But, I get you.

There are many who should not be having kids, perhaps half of the world's population, mostly the liberals and progressives and socialists and communists and lazy.
12 posted on 03/15/2019 6:50:41 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: adorno
And being childless is… bad? Imagine if everybody did it.

You might as well imagine if everyone decided to stop eating. Equally unlikely.

13 posted on 03/15/2019 7:01:07 PM PDT by Simon Green ("Arm your daughter, sir, and pay no attention to petty bureaucrats.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: whistleduck

“...They are special when it comes to mass bloodletting...”

Except to the people they murder.


14 posted on 03/15/2019 7:05:11 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Being childless, whether by choice or inability to conceive, is, in and of itself, neither bad or good. But these women who have attained leadership of their countries do not have, shall we say, skin in the game. What is it to them if the nation’s character is “fundamentally transformed” by their immigration policies? So long as the transformation benefits themselves in the short run. They are ephemera, caring not for the future, and bequeathing only discord, squalor and misery to those they were entrusted to protect.


15 posted on 03/15/2019 7:07:31 PM PDT by Kickaha (See the glory...of the royal scam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat
So the Brits are giving the boot to moose limbs? Oh, just people that support Trump. I👀
16 posted on 03/15/2019 7:16:52 PM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat

One could wonder why these leaders think it is necessary to condemn these acts, acts which are far beyond the reach of mere condemnation to offer any condolence, as if these protestations somehow make the tragedy easier to bear, once these grand personages deign to grant humanity to the victims.


17 posted on 03/15/2019 7:22:21 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickaha

Too bad no children. They could buy them admission to the most prestigious colleges!


18 posted on 03/15/2019 7:34:42 PM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green
You might as well imagine if everyone decided to stop eating. Equally unlikely.

Not quite the same.

People have decided to not have kids, and it's very humanly possible. Not eating, willingly and on your own, requires a lot of inhuman discipline. There are millions of people right now in the world, who have decided to not have kids, and it wasn't difficult to carry out.
19 posted on 03/15/2019 7:37:21 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kickaha

“What is it to them if the nation’s character is “fundamentally transformed” by their immigration policies”


Childlessness has nothing to do with it——look at the Clintons,the Obamas,the Bushes,and Pelosi————they all have kids.

.


20 posted on 03/15/2019 7:39:39 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson