Posted on 01/14/2019 6:50:17 PM PST by rickmichaels
On the bright side, this makes it easy to identify the nutty ones.
Not silly.
True. Diabolical.
This is the danger of being brainwashed by the cult. You have to go deeper and deeper to be a good person.
I’d have to look it up, but I read a peer-reviewed paper which stated that “in agreement with previous studies,” there was a co-morbidity of other mental illnesses in 62% of cases of gender dysphoria being studied.
Another peer-reviewed paper said in their study, 50% co-morbidity accompanying gender dysphoria.
Great graphic!
[Diabolical]
Absolutely. He makes some gaffes here and there.
He is committed to his real father’s cause (John 8:44).
A normal person would be ashamed or embarrassed at the things he often champions. He is the living embodiment of Isaiah 5:20.
He convinces fools it’s “good” and “normal”. And to make it worse, some churches sing his praises in one form or another.
He is a false prophet; a son of destruction. He sows destruction and lies and poison. And the fools cheer him on.
Some have said that when they encountered him in person it was a spiritual significance (or something like that).
I’m sure it was actually spiritual; I’m sure they came into contact with something rather supernatural, but not from the side of God. He casually and purposely omitted “God” from some things. Under his reign, the Democrats booed God at their convention and they booed Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. These things also fly in the face of God.
All of us have rebelled. But this guy made it a national cause. He made the gay Stonewall Inn a national monument. It’s beyond unbelievable. Baalam knew how to take down Israel. This is pretty much the same thing.
I had the link somewhere. Lost it.
So I had to go find it again.
His girlfriend was another man who transitioned to woman after seeing Bruce do it.
“...commit suicide, and live with regret every day for the rest of their lives.”
In that order?
Maybe.
Depends on where they go.
But seriously, I realized after I posted it that it didn’t make sense in that order.
I thought you might have been referring to the afterlife. It just struck me funny being phrased that way.
This ends with normal people going to the ovens. Guaranteed. If we sit and watch, it’s a matter time.>>
Agreed, Why do you think they want to repeal the 2nd amendment and confiscate all of our firearms and ammunition ?
No worries, my daughter went off to college at the age of 17, got married on her 18 birthday, didn’t tell anyone, both ended up in prison she was 8 months pregnant. It can happen to any kid. True story and there is more... Just sayin....
I’m interested in the rest of the story. If you want to tell it.
One of the important historical incidents of the last century was the passage of the Civil Rights Act. Goldwater, of course, opposed it. This was NOT because Goldwater was a racist. He most certainly was not -- and he was from Arizona, back when Hispanics accounted for three percent of the U.S. population, so when you said "minority," Goldwater thought you were talking about the Navajo. Goldwater fully supported eliminating de jure segregation, i.e. discrimination by government. His objection was that the Civil Rights Act overreached by targeting "places of public accommodation." The objective, of course, was to get rid of segregated restrooms, lunch counters and drinking fountains in the Jim Crow South. Goldwater was concerned, however, that the definition of "places of public accommodation" would prove to be infinitely expandable. The public sphere would inexorably expand, and rights of private association would steadily erode. That is, of course, precisely what has happened.
Since abolishing Jim Crow was a self-evidently moral objective, the battering ram was unstoppable regarding matters of race. And most people cheered. The problem was that open-ended precedents were being established. The feminists jumped onto the bandwagon, hitching their agenda to the now-established principle that there can be no "discrimination" in "places of public accommodation." Since women weren't being massively discriminated against in the 1960's -- we were sending them to college in ever-increasing numbers and encouraging them to make careers -- a lot of this was symbolic and/or incidental. All-male social organizations took a battering, even as all-female social organizations were applauded as acts of affirmation and empowerment. A lot of us started muttering about the double standard, but there it was.
What has happened now is that every agitated minority group, including the various sexually confused groups, has a ready-made, virtually unstoppable body of law and precedent on their side the moment they assert that they are the victims of "discrimination." Social shunning and ordinary prudent business judgment in personnel matters have been criminalized. This drives both the grievance culture and the freak show circus of people with mental illnesses demanding affirmation. Claim discrimination, and you've won.
Much of this could have been avoided had Congress listened to Goldwater in 1964 and more carefully drafted the relevant sections of the Civil Rights Act. By now, however, judges have constitutionalized the comedy of errors. What has to be recovered is a robust, constitutionally and legally defensible understanding of the wall between the public and private sector and the rights of free association. People with various mental maladies, including the current sexually non-conforming crowd, could do what they wanted in their own private lives and among their own groups, but they would lose their standing to force others to play their games. How to do that, I don't know.
Yep. Saul Alinsky dedicated his book Rules for Radicals to Satan. Over the Hill and Obama are Alinsky fanatics.
Me too. Prophecy before our very eyes. I always wondered as a kid how the US would ever be fooled into all this stuff that was prophecised. Just pray we stay strong to the end. We’re not alone, but the devil wants us to feel that way.
Probably because they think they could do a better job of it than *real* men. (I know, I don't understand it either.)
Sooooo, women are more easily deceived?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.