Q Anon: 01/04/19 Trust Trump's Plan

” In Nov 2018..$4.7 billion in SNAP benefits were disbursed throughout every state.”
We’re funding these people (no doubt 33% receiving fraudulently) $4.7B PER MONTH while we go begging for a WALL???????
**************************************************************************
The truth burns!!

1,741 posted on 01/07/2019 3:37:12 AM PST by greeneyes

Greeneyes, lease see #1727 and #1732 for current information from Todd Madison’s LinkedIn profile. Regards, deks

1,742 posted on 01/07/2019 3:46:36 AM PST by deks

This article is kind of fun to read in a “how crazy can this get” sort of way.

Title: Fox News viewers literally have no idea how bad things are under Trump: historian

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/fox-news-viewers-literally-no-idea-bad-things-trump-historian/?utm_source=push_notifications

The article details how Trump was creating crises everywhere (e.g., Syria) that “real” news sources, experts everywhere found alarming, and there FOX news was, rehashing unimportant “old news” about illegal immigration!

1,743 posted on 01/07/2019 3:52:17 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

Judge: Lawsuit Over Guatemala Syphilis Experiment to Proceed
Source: Agence France-Presse

“.....the study conducted by the United States more than 60 years ago in Guatemala in which researchers infected hundreds of people with syphilis and gonorrhea without their consent.”

January 05, 2019 4:16 AM
AFP

WASHINGTON —
A U.S. federal judge in Maryland has ruled that pharmaceutical company Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johns Hopkins University and the Rockefeller Foundation must face a $1 billion lawsuit over their roles in a 1940s medical experiment that saw hundreds of Guatemalans infected with syphilis.

https://www.voanews.com/a/judge-lawsuit-over-guatemala-syphilis-experiment-to-proceed/4730000.html

1,744 posted on 01/07/2019 3:58:22 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

perhaps she is smocking without a c

1,745 posted on 01/07/2019 3:58:55 AM PST by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)

1,746 posted on 01/07/2019 4:01:47 AM PST by greeneyes

Not really mine, like all great memes, I stole it!

However, I do have a reasonably hi-res file if you want it..

1,747 posted on 01/07/2019 4:04:17 AM PST by USMC79to83

To: generally; ransomnote; TEXOKIE; bagster; defconw; JockoManning; All

Swamp draining action in Arkansas. Sorry if this has been posted before, but it’s definitely worth reading in case you missed it.
https://www.coreysdigs.com/clinton-foundation/arkansas-swamp-part-ii-spotlight-on-clinton-foundation/
***************************************************************************
I haven’t seen it before. Very interesting-I’m going to copy the conclusions below:

To summarize, the Bill and Hillary Clinton are operating an illegal fictitious company under the Clinton Foundation, in partnership with GE and Tenet Healthcare Corporation, both of whom have been charged for fraud in the past and are currently under investigation again, together with Verizon, all with a focus on healthcare and Medicaid in Little Rock.

They ran this program throughout Pulaski County for five years, from 2012-2017, during a time where investigations into Medicaid fraud and looking into behavioral health care facilities, with a strong focus on legislators (past and present), were taking place, and future arrests are eminent.

There are also ongoing Federal investigations taking place simultaneously, in which it would appear as though the Clinton Foundation is one of those investigations.

They have connections to the Pulaski County Youth Services, where the former DNC consultant was recently arrested on pornography charges of streaming live chat rooms where infants were being raped.

They also have connections to Henry Wilkins, Casandra Wilkins Slater, and many arms that extend from the Wilkins family. They have connections with Linda Chesterfield and Governor Beebe, both of whom accepted campaign money from Preferred Family Healthcare.

Linda Chesterfield, on was on Hillary Clinton’s leadership council for her 2016 presidential campaign, and has connections with Rusty Cranford, the key central figure in Warford’s investigation.

And finally, Linda Cavaness, who pleaded guilty to campaign fraud, used to be a deputy finance director for Hillary’s 2008 presidential campaign.

The Clinton Foundation, through Clinton Health Matters Initiative, had over 200 supporters working with them, from the police departments to the governor’s office, the department of human services where the deputy director pleaded guilty in February 2016 to bribery schemes and is serving a 30-month prison sentence, to the department of health and education, the university and school district, as well as the Winthrop Rockefeller Institute, Planned Parenthood, and Loop Capital Markets – just to name a few.

All of these businesses and institutions are complicit in working with an illegally operating entity, Clinton Health Matters Initiative.

Add to this, the Wilkins case sentencing being pushed back several times in joint motions between his attorneys and government, all raises one very important question – are these investigations heading down a track that can only end at Clinton station, or perhaps the library?

1,748 posted on 01/07/2019 4:08:42 AM PST by greeneyes

Nancy Pelosi offered a one dollar donation to Trump’s border wall
******
And how much did she spend on the wall around her house?

1,749 posted on 01/07/2019 4:20:32 AM PST by Yulee

What we have heea is a failure to communicate.

1,750 posted on 01/07/2019 4:22:24 AM PST by Yulee

Debugging a theory

https://nypost.com/2019/01/06/sonic-attacks-at-us-embassy-in-cuba-may-have-just-been-crickets/

‘Sonic attacks’ at US embassy in Cuba may have just been crickets

FTA:
But a fresh analysis of an audio recording made by US personnel in Cuba revealed that the source of the piercing din is the song of the Indies short-tailed cricket, known as Anurogryllus celerinictus, a study says.

“The recording is definitively a cricket that belongs to the same group,” said Fernando Montealegre-Zapata, a professor of sensory biology at the University of Lincoln who participated in the study, according to The Guardian. “The call of this Caribbean species is about 7 kHz, and is delivered at an unusually high rate, which gives humans the sensation of a continuous sharp trill.”

The study, by Montealegre-Zapata and Alexander Stubbs at the University of California, was published Jan. 4 on the website bioRxiv.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/01/04/510834

1,751 posted on 01/07/2019 4:30:42 AM PST by mairdie (Creating wine in America 1769 - http://www.iment.com/maida/familytree/antill/edwardgrapesarticle.htm)

“What we have heea is a failure to communicate”*********************Strother Martin

1,752 posted on 01/07/2019 4:35:46 AM PST by christianbasque (Toasting an Irish coffee to my beloved Carol & Sean...)

https://spectator.org/the-most-successful-coverup/

The Most Successful Coverup

Democrats get away with a much worse crime than Watergate.

Jed Babbin

Since Watergate, the Washington wisdom has always held that it’s not the crime, it’s the coverup that sinks a politician. But that’s only the case when the coverup fails.

But what if the coverup succeeds?

It’s horribly simple. The crimes are never uncovered and the perpetrators are never brought to justice no matter how serious their crimes may be. That is precisely what has happened because of the FBI and Justice Department’s coverup of their abuses of power and illegal actions during the 2016 election.

In this case, the FBI and the Justice Department have succeeded in the most significant coverup in American political history. The abuses of power and crimes they have succeeded in covering up are not only against the law: they are crimes against our system of law and government. They were perpetrated by employees of the government, under color of law, with the intention of affecting the outcome of an election.

For almost two years an investigation into the abuses of power — and probable crimes — committed by the FBI and Justice Department during the election has been conducted by House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence chairman Devin Nunes (R-Cal). Rep. Bob Goodlatte — chairman of the Judiciary Committee — and Trey Gowdy — chairman of the Oversight and government reform committee — tried to investigate other aspects of the FBI and DoJ actions.

These investigations have been stonewalled by the refusal of the FBI and Justice Department to produce the documents and provide access to witnesses that would, in all likelihood, prove that the major abuses of power and crimes had been committed.

Nunes, Goodlatte, and Gowdy had effectively split their inquiries: Nunes investigating possible crimes and abuses of power under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and Goodlatte and Gowdy jointly investigating the FBI’s mishandling and improper actions in its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private, insecure email system for conversations with her staff — and Obama — on top secret information, including special access programs and satellite intelligence.

The two important products of those investigations were the 18 January 2017 memo declassified by President Trump and released by Nunes and the newly released 28 December 2018 letter from Goodlatte and Gowdy addressed to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, and DoJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

If this is the first you’ve heard of the 28 December letter, that’s because it’s been studiously ignored by the media.

The key facts revealed by the Nunes memo were:

(1) that the FBI used, as the factual basis for the Foreign Intelligence Act Surveillance Court warrant applications, information from the Steele dossier, a compilation of anti-Trump information that the FBI had not verified. The FBI nevertheless swore to the truth of that information to obtain surveillance warrants on Carter Page, a one-time Trump campaign advisor; and

(2) that in the process of obtaining the search warrants the FBI failed to inform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the Steele dossier was bought and paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.

As I wrote at the time of the memo’s release, and on several occasions since, the Nunes memo showed that the actions of the FBI and Justice Department, sometimes in conjunction with the Obama White House, were worse than Watergate.

The Nunes investigation is over, but myriad questions remain. Among them:

What other FISA warrants were obtained to surveil the communications of Americans, particularly those of the Trump campaign advisors and Trump himself?
Obama’s National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, was asking for and obtaining hundreds of “unmaskings,” revealing of U.S. citizens’ identities when their communications were intercepted by the FBI and NSA as part of intelligence operations. Whose names were unmasked, was this information used to Trump’s disadvantage in the campaign, why did the unmaskings occur, and what information was shared by Rice with Obama and/or Clinton?
What direction did the FBI, the NSA, and other intelligence agencies receive from Obama, Rice, and Obama’s CIA director, John Brennan, with respect to the monitoring of Trump-related communications?

Most, if not all, of that information could be gleaned from documents and testimony the FBI and DoJ have withheld from congressional investigators.

The latest, and almost certainly last, effort to expose the facts of this scandal are contained in the Goodlatte-Gowdy letter. They are the last exposé because the Democrats have stopped these investigations cold. There will be no more hearings, no more testimony, and no further attempts to get the documents and testimony from the FBI and Justice Department that have been withheld.

The Goodlatte-Gowdy letter is as revealing as was the Nunes memo. The two outgoing committee chairmen chose to focus on the importance of decisions made and not made by the FBI and DoJ, the bias of some agents and attorneys involved, and the evidently disparate treatment of the Clinton email investigation and the counter-intelligence investigation of the Trump campaign.

Under 18 US Code Section 793(f) it is a felony to handle classified information in a “grossly negligent” manner. The Goodlatte-Gowdy letter flatly says that the FBI and DoJ read elements into the “gross negligence” law that do not exist. In then-FBI director James Comey’s 5 July 2016 televised statement exonerating Clinton, the FBI read into the law a higher level of scienter — intent and knowledge of the unlawfulness of conduct — than the law required.

Moreover, the letter says, there is little or no evidence investigators made any effort to identify evidence that could have satisfied the FBI-devised scienter element that is not in the law.

We should remember Comey’s televised statement in which he said that “no reasonable prosecutor” would have brought a case against Clinton under the gross negligence law. He also said that the decision not to do so was unanimous among those involved.

That was one of Comey’s biggest lies. As the Goodlatte-Gowdy letter points out, FBI General Counsel James Baker told them that he did believe a case could be made and the recommendation not to charge Clinton wasn’t unanimous.

Goodlatte and Gowdy point out that Comey’s exoneration memo was drafted before all of the relevant witnesses had been interviewed. What they fail to mention is that the FBI and DoJ were handing out immunity from prosecution agreements to Clinton staffers as freely as if the agreements were Halloween candy.

Immunity agreements are given to key witnesses in criminal investigations for a price: their testimony against a target of the investigation which could not otherwise be obtained. There is no evidence whatsoever that any of the witnesses involved — Clinton staffers such as Cheryl Mills, her chief of staff at the State Department — gave any evidence that justified the immunity agreements.

The Goodlatte-Gowdy letter also points out that the Comey exoneration memo was changed before it was issued, but fails to specify the biggest change. Originally a part of the memo said that Clinton and her staff handled classified information in a “grossly negligent” manner. Comey changed that to read “extremely careless,” clearly to prevent the law from being applied. The only difference between the two phrases is that one appears in the statute and one doesn’t, but Comey nevertheless stated that there was no prosecutable case.

Comey also, according to the letter, overlooked evidence that foreign actors had accessed Clinton’s emails, and probably those of her staffers, including at least one containing “Secret” information. That information, too, was excised from Comey’s draft exoneration memo for the purpose of helping Clinton.

The only conclusion possible — which Goodlatte and Gowdy do not state — is that Comey’s FBI intentionally gave Clinton a pass when they should have recommended to the Justice Department that she be prosecuted.

Comey is not the only malfeasant named in the Goodlatte-Gowdy letter. The other is former FBI agent Peter Strzok, he of the thousands of text messages sent to or received from his lover, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, that showed he — and she and others in the FBI — weren’t only biased against Trump, but had an abiding hatred of him.

Strzok’s central role in the Clinton and Trump investigations probably ended in 2017 when Special Counsel Robert Mueller removed him from the Mueller team. Before that, as the letter says, Strzok:

Conducted the interview of Clinton (which wasn’t recorded or transcribed contrary to normal procedure) and participated heavily in other aspects of the Clinton investigation;
Initiated the Russia investigation of the Trump campaign and helped draft— and possibly swore to — the FISA warrant applications;
Promised to stop Trump from becoming president and openly discussed an “insurance policy” if Trump won;
Called Trump “destabilizing; and
Interviewed Michael Flynn, leading to Flynn’s indictment for lying to the FBI.

Strzok was finally fired from the FBI in August 2018. We — including Nunes, Goodlatte and Gowdy — don’t know whether he was involved in the investigation of the Trump campaign after Mueller removed him in 2017.

Comey’s appearances in congressional hearings have yielded nothing of value because he has been instructed by FBI lawyers not to answer any of the critical questions.

Another possible malfeasant, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, has been equally protected. As the Goodlatte-Gowdy letter explains, former FBI general counsel James Baker testified that after Trump fired Comey there were discussions among FBI staff about Trump’s fitness for office and invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump.

Baker testified that he was told — by then-acting FBI director Andrew McCabe and Strzok’s lover, Lisa Page — that Rosenstein had proposed wearing a recording device in conversations with President Trump. To record what? Rosenstein was supposed to be interviewed by the Goodlatte-Gowdy investigators but was never available. Rosenstein has denied that he said anything about wearing a recording device in conversations with Trump.

The only avenue that was left to find the truth was for President Trump to have ordered the documents declassified and provided to Congress. But he never acted and now the investigations are closed. The Senate won’t reopen them, nor will acting AG Whitaker or IG Horowitz. The only hope resides in U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber, an Obama appointee, who then-AG Jeff Sessions tasked to investigate FBI misconduct in the election. Those who place their hopes in Huber will be disappointed.

The stain on our system of justice and the 2016 election created by the abuses of power and probable crimes committed by FBI and DoJ officials during and after the 2016 presidential campaign will not be erased. Their coverup has succeeded.

1,753 posted on 01/07/2019 4:39:21 AM PST by mairdie (Creating wine in America 1769 - http://www.iment.com/maida/familytree/antill/edwardgrapesarticle.htm)

Interesting about the swamp draining in Arkansas. Perhaps the Clintoons will go away for all those machinations...but I selfishly want a big, clear, easy to grasp conviction that all Americans can understand.

One of my fears is that Q team and POTUS will accomplish their goals but half of America will still be full of bitterness and confusion.

1,754 posted on 01/07/2019 4:41:24 AM PST by Melian (Check yourself before you kek yourself. ~ Melian)

Looks like a photoshop to me

Has that smell

1,755 posted on 01/07/2019 4:41:35 AM PST by USMC79to83

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ill-say-it-elizabeth-warren-isnt-likeable

I’ll Say It: Elizabeth Warren Isn’t Likeable

AOC, Krysten Sinema, even Nancy Pelosi—as a conservative, I find them all likeable to some degree. Warren, not so much. It’s not about all women. It’s just about her.

Matt Lewis

FTA:
I’m a conservative, so I don’t really worry about whether I’ve offended liberal feminists. I don’t have a problem saying that Warren is unlikeable. She seems preachy and angry to me. Actually, she’s a combination of some of the horrible math teachers I endured in middle school, and a friend’s overly emotional mom.

This might sound pretty specific, but we’ve all met people like Warren. She’s an archetype of a genre that I’m pretty sure would turn off a lot of voters. What is more, she increasingly looks like a phony—a problem she is reinforcing by trying to copy Alexandria Ocasio Cortez’s Instagram game.

This is not an indictment of powerful women, but of Elizabeth Warren. I’m a fan of Nikki Haley. And though I’m no more ideologically simpatico to Nancy Pelosi, Krysten Sinema, or AOC than I am to Warren, the aforementioned progressive women seem kind of charming to me.

1,756 posted on 01/07/2019 4:41:52 AM PST by mairdie (Creating wine in America 1769 - http://www.iment.com/maida/familytree/antill/edwardgrapesarticle.htm)

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/01/07/mitt_romney_ready_for_my_close-up_mr_demille_139097.html

Mitt Romney: ‘Ready for My Close-Up, Mr. DeMille’

By Frank Miele

It is hard to quantify the smallness of Mitt Romney, but let’s just say that if character were measured in shoe size, we’d be using the children’s scale to gauge his worth.

He certainly is not qualified to walk in the shoes of President Trump, nor even to follow in his footsteps. Utah’s newest senator is so small he’d get lost in the cavernous legacy left behind by each footfall of the historic president who dares to walk upright among the craven beasts of the Swamp.

Yet Romney continues to surprise in his utter inability to recognize this—or accept his own limitations. Last week, as the rest of us were celebrating the new year, Romney was celebrating his own self-righteousness in a self-indulgent op-ed published in the Never Trumpers’ unofficial house organ, a.k.a. The Washington Post. Published under the lugubrious headline “The president shapes the public character of the nation. Trump’s character falls short,” this nastygram was apparently intended to reassure us that a new adult is in the room to take the place of dour and departed Jim Mattis.

Romney’s earnest lesson is so ham-handed and schoolmarmish that it’s almost as if American presidents’ lessons of the past 60 years on character building were missed by prissy Mitt. Consider the character building by Lyndon Johnson as he fed our young men to the meat grinder in Vietnam. Consider the character building by Richard Nixon as he plotted his political survival by both carpet-bombing in Cambodia and covering up conspiracies in D.C. Consider the character building of Jimmy Carter and his 20 percent inflation rate. Forcing people to work two or three jobs to pay their bills surely must have built character, right? I could go on, but why bother. It’s too depressing, and meanwhile right alongside all that character building, you could be measuring the steady decline of the American economy, middle class and nation-state.

Leave it to Mitt to find the real culprit of the collapse of American character. It all comes down to Donald Trump and the haunting green light at the end of the dock on East Egg — oops, that was the Great Gatsby, not the Great Trump, although Romney might find it hard to distinguish between them as he envisions himself as the Nick Carraway moralist who is narrating the tragedy of the American crash that will soon claim our imagined innocence.
...
[analysis of Romney’s article]

1,757 posted on 01/07/2019 4:45:40 AM PST by mairdie (Creating wine in America 1769 - http://www.iment.com/maida/familytree/antill/edwardgrapesarticle.htm)

Speaking of derps. What is a tender and innocent soul to do when the mean kids pick on you? Why, make a chart and put it on your profile page, of course.

How 'bout:

Jerk Derp?

1,758 posted on 01/07/2019 4:46:01 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (The Obama is about to hit the fan.)

Some of the photos used have changed for sure. I believe the changed lines are about the Clinton Foundation. I haven’t dug into it and I may be wrong!

-SB

1,759 posted on 01/07/2019 4:49:19 AM PST by Snowybear

> qmap.pub and cdn.qmap.pub

Amazon’s AWS services are basically linux virtual machines that sit out on the cloud (Amazon real servers). We use the service where I work.

-SB

1,760 posted on 01/07/2019 4:54:36 AM PST by Snowybear

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794