Posted on 12/25/2018 8:07:33 AM PST by rey
My granddaughter got a geode, a meteorite, and a fossilized shark's tooth (she loves this stuff) for Christmas. Every package, though from out of state, had a label stating:
Warning-California Proposition 65: This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
Is Santa trying to kill us?
California = La La Land: More proof that liberalism is a mental disease.
No, no, no.
He just wants to “to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.”
In the meantime, have fun.
Merry Christmas!
Several years ago I visited California (on business, it wasn’t like I had a choice), and found warnings in the parking garages and most of the buildings I visited. I concluded then that the entire purpose was to train people to ignore the warnings. The real goal is to get people to ignore real warnings. Part of the left’s goal of culling the herd.
Yeah, including the geode. Which is a natural object. A rock, in fact.
Wait until the regulators find out that Sierra Mountain granite and stones contain Uranium (which is radioactive) which emits Radon (which is radioactive) into basements and houses ...
Or that the volcanoes in the Central Valley emit CO2!
It seems like everything I bought online this year had that stupid CA warning on it.
... or that running your heater adds to Global Warming.
The geode is the state rock of Iowa and is found along the Mississippi River at Keokuk.
They need a sign going into natafornia that entering the stat may cause death, cancer, reproductive issues, homosexuality, liberalism and mental health issues.
LOL! Yup, just ordered two sets of floor mats for the truck and car and it was duly noted that certain materials involved in the manufacture of them were KNOWN TO CAUSE CANCER IN CALIFORNIA. Well, I live close to the state line but as long as I don’t cross over I should remain cancer free. Right? :-)
Merry Christmas
p.s. But, I am skerred to drink out of the hose now.
***This product may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. ***
Obviously this ONLY affects those in California.
Well, friction ya know.
Merry Christmas.
What a great kid you got there! Geology, astronomy and paleontology, have fun Grampa.
“Welcome to Barter Town!”
California is the liberal test bed demonstrating just a few loci where the growth of functionally illiterate organisms is encouraged and protected can yield social tumors capable of giving the experimenters vise-like control of an otherwise healthy body politic.
She’s lucky she didn’t get a blood transfusion from a gay man because California says that’s harmless.
BTW I’m jealous of your granddaughter’s gifts. Way cool!
I’ve looked into Prop65, and while I think that there is some strange abuse in it, I fully love it.
Prop 65 is often thought of as something totally stupid. The truth is far from that:
If a company has a “secret formula” they have been able to hide those contents from everyone. As rightfully they should. If their competitor got ahold of their ingredients they wouldn’t have a competitive edge !
So nationally our companies are protected from being forced to disclose their secrets, their competitive edges and the such. But in California Prop 65 changed that.
In California you MUST disclose every chemical and ingredient in your product. If you do not, then you must allow all consumers to assume that you are hiding something terrible in it - something carcinogenic.
So if you want to keep your ingredients secret, you’ll need to instead bear that warning. Not all things in California have this warning. Nay, not everything needs it.
Rocks are a source of radiation. Radiation causes cancer. If the seller of the rock puts a label on it that says “This rock may be radioactive” then they won’t have to put a prop 65 warning on it. But then people might think “Whoa, this is radioactive?”
Yes. Rocks can be radioactive.
Oregon’s State Rock , as well. I’ll have to look up the ones in Ilwa. They’re probably quite different.
Santa seems to
Have a bit of an
“Attitude!”
Probably Libtards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.