Posted on 12/16/2018 7:36:12 PM PST by simpson96
Social media sensations and Fox Nation hosts Diamond & Silk slammed Nancy Pelosi for her stance in the border security funding battle, calling the Democratic leader "out of touch."
Pelosi on Thursday called out President Trump for threatening a government shutdown over Congress' failure to approve funding for border security -- including his long-promised wall -- saying the American people don't want a "Trump shutdown."
On "Fox & Friends" Friday, Lynnette "Diamond" Hardaway said Trump has followed through on his promise to boost the economy, and now it's time for Congress to approve wall funding so he can follow through on another core campaign promise.
"What I don't understand and what's so mind-boggling about Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer is that they live behind walls," she said. "Don't your walls protect you? So why don't you want to protect America by building a wall?"
Rochelle "Silk" Richardson claimed the wall would pay for itself by curbing illegal immigration and drug trafficking, which would lessen the burden on American taxpayers.
To see more from Diamond & Silk, check out their weekly program on Fox Nation, with a new episode each Tuesday. The must-see streaming platform gives Fox News fans exclusive daily content on-demand and brand-new offerings each week.
(Excerpt) Read more at insider.foxnews.com ...
No, I’m not. Walls support a roof to protect from the elements. A better analogy is the one about locked doors & crime.
The walls cited by some folks do exist around some celebrities’ homes and, perhaps, some politicians’ homes, but not Pelosi’s or Schumer’s.
As I stated prior, I get their drift, but this logic is nonsensical to the argument of a border wall.
Go ahead if it makes you feel better.
BTW, just what was the purpose of a “fort” back in the day if the walls of the cabins were so effective???
Why are the walls of prisons insufficient themselves to keep prisoners inside?
Whatever makes you feel better, straw man.
The truth does, half-truther-man.
I hope you like peanuts.
Case in point, this 3 foot wall marking Pelosi's vineyard property.
Your picture is obviously from a remote end of her huge vineyard, but let's take another quick couple looks at that same Pelosi vineyard property, at different parts of it, and different angles.
|
Anyone who tries to claim that a wall like that cannot provide protection, is quite simply, ignorant, and 100% wrong. It could be electrified, and most likely has various triggers for intruder alarms, as well as video observation and recording devices, and possibly a bunch of inaudible alarms for badass guard dogs, as well as possible alerts for some armed guards, and who knows what else. Believe me, you don't want to try to breech any of Pelosi's residential walls, or trespass on any of Pelosi's walled properties illegally, otherwise, you probably won't be around anymore to post anything.
You can deny it over and over again, but the actual truth is, Pelosi's house walls and her perimeter walls are both there to protect her and her property. I'm done arguing with you about this. If you can't see that simple fact, too bad.
You want to dig in & double down? Fine.
The segment of stone wall I posted is about 3 feet high. The vinyl fencing is commercial and is listed at 4 feet. That is not a “wall”.
You state “Your picture is obviously from a remote end of her huge vineyard”: Talk about straw man. If one section is taller and the remainder is short, what’s the point? The wall keeps out nothing. It marks a boundary, equivalent to a 3 foot tall border fence at a fraction of the projected cost with a nice, 20 foot tall fence section at ports of entry. Is THAT what you’re proposing???
This argument is total BS. Hyperbole. So goes the DS position. I like DS, but this is no different than CNN. Yet again, as stated prior, whatever makes you feel better.
Emotions & all.
I won’t be mocked for using lousy examples to get a rise out of my thousands of followers...which is exactly what we’re talking about here, is it not???
Or maybe you have a genuine example of a security perimeter protecting a US Congressman? I couldn’t find one for Pelosi & Schumer. DS certainly didn’t post a damned thing.
Fire away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.