Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

An opinion by an Electronics Engineer and Scifi guy-

The good things: the opening is artistic, the acting is good, the props and special effects are great for a TV series, the camera work is awesome. It's bright, super saturated in color, has action in it.

The bad things: It's entirely PC mush (diversity themes), homo agenda, feminist, demographically represented, all the white men are "toxic," environmentalist crap added, AND BREAKS WITH STAR TREK AND CONTAINS LITTLE TO NO SCIFI.

Unfortunately, the new Star Trek has little to no science fiction. It's a PC situational drama in space. There are the power warrior women, loving and balanced homosexual interracial couples, spores and rare endangered species that power the newest drive and navigation systems... If you're looking for science fiction, you'll find zero.

The original Star Trek is a high bench mark to live up to regards the SciFi. The original Star Trek came out in September 1966 and had such things as touch screens, communicators, tractor beams (at a microscopic level we already have working tractor beams: Optical Tweezers), flat panel displays, tablets, voice activated controls and computers, ear buds where you had a signal going to them like what we have today with Bluetooth, self opening doors with sensors. Remember the doctors tricorder in Star Trek, where they would get all the medical information by just holding the tricorder near you or running a sensor over you? Do we still run a thermometer up the butt or under the arm? Even pulse, how do we get that today?

It is evident that the original Star Trek coordinated/consulted with scientists and engineers that were on the bleeding edge of development at the time, but that CANNOT be said with these demographically correct newer versions of this show where all they come up with is mushroom powered starships that are navigated by endangered species. While today the actors cry much better, and the sets are more elaborate, camera crews and special effects are awesome, only the original Star Trek remains true "science fiction."

Suggestion: Keep the camera crew, keep the artists that did the opening, keep most of the actors, keep the folks that make the props or do the special effects, ***kill off the writers for this show.*** They have managed to literally stuff ever pop culture and PC theme into this show. It feels like plastic, fake, artificial and forced. The show is so chalk full of this crap that it over powers everything else in the show.

1 posted on 11/23/2018 11:04:05 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red6

This is News/Activism?


2 posted on 11/23/2018 11:09:26 AM PST by polymuser (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged today. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

3 posted on 11/23/2018 11:13:53 AM PST by SunkenCiv (and btw -- https://www.gofundme.com/for-rotator-cuff-repair-surgery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6
The show is so chalk full

How much chalk could a full chalk chalk if a....

Maybe "chock".

Yeah.

4 posted on 11/23/2018 11:14:35 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6
It is evident that the original Star Trek coordinated/consulted with scientists and engineers that were on the bleeding edge of development at the time, but that CANNOT be said with these demographically correct newer versions of this show where all they come up with is mushroom powered starships that are navigated by endangered species. 

It is evident that the new Star Trek coordinated/consulted with social scientists and social engineers that are on the current bleeding edge of "development". I think the bleeding edge is at the cutting point on society's neck.

6 posted on 11/23/2018 11:16:07 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Leave the job, leave the clearance. It should be the same rule for the Swamp as for everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Tried.Quit after 2 episodes. Won’t survive.

Un-watchable Cultural Marxism.


7 posted on 11/23/2018 11:17:48 AM PST by Para-Ord.45 (Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

It is a well known fact that the largest consumers of science fiction are young males.

These shows are not put out to entertain.

They are put out to propagandize.


9 posted on 11/23/2018 11:19:55 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Watched it last year without paying. Had to watch it because it was Star Trek but was totally disgusted with the politics.

I won’t pay for it


11 posted on 11/23/2018 11:27:03 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Season 2 is going to be epic. They’ve hired New writers and the focus of the season will be on Captain Christopher Pike (former captain of the Enterprise before Kirk) and Spock. Pike arrives on the Enterprise and takes command of Discovery on a season long mission.


14 posted on 11/23/2018 11:31:45 AM PST by Proud White Trump Supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Star Trek: Discovery meets the New Ms Doctor Who ... All PC all the time, no social stone left unturned no matter the time ...


15 posted on 11/23/2018 11:40:10 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

If they think I’m actually going to pay for SJW drippins they are as insane as the worse than worthless writers.


16 posted on 11/23/2018 11:43:11 AM PST by Nateman (If the left is not screaming, you are doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Does the albino die?


17 posted on 11/23/2018 11:45:40 AM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6
The original Star Trek is a high bench mark to live up to regards the SciFi. The original Star Trek came out in September 1966 and had such things as touch screens, communicators, tractor beams

And yet, every once in a while, an anachronism would be thrown in. I remember one scene inwhat was probably an engineering section, where there was a fight, and sitting all by itself in that pristine, uncluttered, futuristic room was a 20th century style monkey wrench, that was exploited as a weapon.
18 posted on 11/23/2018 11:54:57 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

All the writers who insist on interjecting SJW crap and all the producers who tell them to do so need to take a flying leap off a tall building so they can get some real writers with real imaginations in there.

Just about every frickin’ drama show on TV has been ruined by these SJW freaks.


23 posted on 11/23/2018 12:21:01 PM PST by Boomer (The only good leftists are those who have 'left us' for another country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6
The original Star Trek came out in September 1966 and had such things as touch screens, communicators, tractor beams

And yet they couldn't put pockets on the uniforms, something they corrected in the movie versions of Star Trek. A future without pockets is a future I would hate.

24 posted on 11/23/2018 12:21:32 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Whoa! Bummer dude!

Thanks for this review. Saved me a lot of time.


25 posted on 11/23/2018 12:23:29 PM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Progressives doing what they did to Star Wars to Star Trek. No surprise here. Just one more thing to scratch off the “things to watch” list.


28 posted on 11/23/2018 12:32:56 PM PST by Desron13 (Inside every progressive is a petty tyrant straining to break free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

I enjoyed watching Seth McFarlane’s “The Orville” more than I did ST:D. Oh, it’s far from perfect, too, but at least it’s light-hearted and generally fun, if silly. ST:D just rubbed me the wrong way for some reason - probably the fact that it just didn’t seem very “Star Trek”-like.


32 posted on 11/23/2018 12:42:04 PM PST by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like tractor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6
I winced every now and then watching The Next Generation too. Not nearly as SJW as Discovery, but SJW for its day.

Let's be honest, so was the original series with Shatner and Nimoy. I'm not talking about the anti-racial stuff, I'm talking about the money-free socialism.

34 posted on 11/23/2018 1:00:23 PM PST by Tell It Right (Will Gus keep his job after the beat down from Bama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Why was this in News?
Why was this in the Activism sidebar?


35 posted on 11/23/2018 1:13:46 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson