Posted on 11/15/2018 10:06:57 PM PST by yesthatjallen
Facebook is being hit with fresh criticism from Capitol Hill as lawmakers reacted harshly Thursday to a New York Times investigation that detailed the company’s efforts to wield influence in Washington after becoming aware of Russia-linked activity on its platform during the 2016 presidential campaign.
The explosive article laid out how Facebook’s leadership was reluctant to confront the Russian efforts on its platform and was unprepared for the subsequent firestorm and fallout, which involved the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Specifically, the Times reported that the tech giant used a Republican opposition research firm called Definers Public Affairs to accuse liberal financier George Soros of funding some of the groups that were speaking out against Facebook as it faced public scrutiny over its handling of both the Russian disinformation campaigns and the Cambridge Analytica debacle.
On Thursday, a group of Senate Democrats — Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Chris Coons (Del.) and Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) — requested that the Justice Department "expand any investigation into Facebook and Cambridge Analytica to include whether Facebook — or any other entity affiliated with or hired by Facebook — retaliated against critics or public officials seeking to regulate the platform, or hid vital information from the public."
The Times story is likely to fuel some Democratic lawmakers' calls to regulate the platform and others, as many in the party have become furious over the string of data privacy breaches and what they see as a lack of accountability in the industry.
“It’s alarming, it’s appalling,” Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) told The Hill. “It shows that they were not behaving like a neutral platform. It shows that they were engaged in information operations. That they have engaged in a strategy to avoid any oversight or regulations. This is what you get when an American corporation gets so big and is exempted from any meaningful oversight.”
The social network on Thursday moved into damage control mode, first by issuing a statement saying the New York Times story contained a “number of inaccuracies.” Later, CEO Mark Zuckerberg spoke to reporters on a conference call.
“I've said many times before that we were too slow to spot Russian interference, too slow to understand it and too slow to get on top of it,” Zuckerberg said. “And we certainly stumbled along the way. But to suggest that we weren't interested in knowing the truth or that we wanted to hide what we knew or that we tried to prevent investigations is simply untrue.”
Facebook also defended the work by Definers, saying it was “reprehensible and untrue” to suggest that linking Soros to Facebook’s critics was anti-Semitic.
The company terminated its contract with the firm on Thursday following the story’s publication, and on the call with reporters, Zuckerberg emphasized that he and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg were not aware of Definers’ work on their company’s behalf.
“This type of firm might be normal in Washington, but it's not the kind of thing I want Facebook to be associated with which is why we're no longer going to be working with them,” Zuckerberg said.
Color of Change, one of the groups that Definers reportedly targeted on behalf of Facebook, condemned what it said was anti-Semitism when Definers emphasized the Soros connection to groups speaking out against Facebook.
“Facebook's response to our campaign, which challenged them to improve their platform and create safe conditions for Black people and other marginalized groups, was to fan the flames of anti-Semitism,” Rashad Robinson, the group’s president, said in a statement Thursday. “By suggesting to reporters that Color Of Change is acting as the puppet of Mr. Soros merely because he is one of our many funders, they have given oxygen to the worst anti-Semitic conspiracy theories of the white nationalist Trump base.”
The Times story also implicated lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) intervened on Facebook’s behalf as the company was facing a firestorm on the Hill over the Cambridge Analytica scandal and Russian internet campaigns to sow discord among the U.S. electorate, according to the Times.
Schumer reportedly told Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, which has been leading the probe into Russian interference, to back off his criticism of Facebook, where Schumer's daughter works. Warner has been an outspoken critic of Facebook and other internet platforms since 2016 and has proposed a number of ways to crack down on them.
On Thursday, he declined to discuss whether Schumer asked him to tone down his remarks about the company.
“I'm not going to talk about any private conversations I had with the Leader,” Warner told reporters. “I can just say this ... he was very aware of the fact that our committee has been relentless and still have a lot of questions that need to be answered.”
A Senate source familiar with the meeting between the two senators told The Hill that Schumer advised Warner to focus his efforts on election interference out of concern that Facebook would bow to pressure from the right to forgo purging the network of fake Russian accounts and bots.
Never used farcebook, won’t go to it in any way, never trusted it or any other social media.
Save the link. Post it to any comment Democrats claim Russia influenced the election.
The Lefty Fascists apparently don’t like Zuckerberg using their own tactics against them.
The snake is starting to eat itself.
My hope is that FB “reels” right off the New York Stock Exchange.
I don’t like what it is doing to our portfolio.
I wish they would kick it and Alphabet the heck off of the Nasdaq.
Since I don’t get NYT, was there any mention in the article that Obama was given the information and more for free that Cambridge Analytic paid for? The Obama/Hillary democrats have a huge database of US citizenry vitals and preferences.
Agree very much. Talk about over valued. They produce advertising?
Facebook = Useful Idiot, very useful idiot. 2 funny, the left consuming its own. The snowflakes at FB must be gathering in anxiety circles as I type.
FB gets money from selling user data. In the long run, the NYT article can cut the number of new users, and thus help to bring FB down. The question is, how stupid are the people in the world who have not signed up, and those who have signed up and will give up more of their data when FB threatens to kick them off if they don’t comply?
Facebook manipulated the 2018 Midterms in favor of the Democrats, with their censorship of conservatives.
There are people who unfortunately get their news from Facebook.
There is a site minds.com that is supposed to be a conservative alternative for Facebook.
Liberals want to regulate Facebook...but what they really want to do is regulate all social media...they just know that Republicans are dumb enough to go along with it because of facebook. What is at stake is that Dems will get to write the rules we will have to live with going forward.
What was it they found, someone bought $ 100,000 worth of anti-Hillary ads they couldn’t even identify as coming from Russia and not simply being routed through Russia. So few people saw them and they certainly didn’t convince anyone to vote for Trump, well maybe 5 people. LOL
Of course Soros money helped to fuel the criticism on FB. I bet the Times didn’t research that. I trust FB on this one, that Soros was funding some of the attack on FB
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.