Credit: Tom's Guide
Posted on 11/05/2018 7:27:11 PM PST by Swordmaker
When Apple introduced the new iPad Pro, the company boasted that its slim slate is more powerful than 92 percent of PCs out there. Now that we've benchmarked the 12.9-inch iPad Pro for our review over at Laptop Mag, it looks like that claim could very well be legit.
The 7-nanometer A12X Bionic chip processor inside the iPad Pro packs four performance cores and four high-efficiency cores, and there's a new GPU that promises twice the graphics performance as the A10X processor inside the last iPad Pro.
And the benchmark results are quite impressive.
On Geekbench 4, which measures overall performance, the iPad Pro notched a score of 17,995. That blows past the Surface Pro 6 with a Core i5 CPU and even the Core i7 version of the Dell XPS 13.
Samsung's Qualcomm Snapdragon 850-powered Galaxy Book 2 (3,945) doesn't even come close to Intel-based PCs, nevermind the iPad Pro. The 13-inch MacBook Pro with a Core i7 chip was just slightly below the iPad Pro at 17,348.
To test the A12X Bionic's real-world power, we turned to Adobe Rush, a video editing app. We took a 12-minute 4K video and transcoded it to 1080p at 24 frames per second. And once again the iPad Pro blew away the field.
Apple's tablet took just 7 minutes and 47 seconds to complete our task. It took the 13-inch MacBook Pro 25 minutes and 53 seconds, and the Dell XPS 13 (31:03) and Surface Pro 6 (31:54) both took over half an hour.
We then turned to Adobe Lightroom to see how long it would take to export 50 RAW images to the JPEG format, and the iPad Pro once again outperformed the competition--though not by as large a margin.
The iPad Pro took 59 seconds to complete the batch export, while the Surface Pro 6 (1:35) and 13-inch MacBook Pro (1:36) were about 30 seconds behind. Strangely, the Core i7 XPS 13 took 2:01 on this test.
If you're wondering how efficient the A12X Bionic processor is, you'll probably be glad to know that the new iPad Pro offers pretty great battery life. On the Laptop Mag Battery Test, which involves web surfing at 150 nits of screen brightness, Apple's tablet lasted for 13 hours and 41 minutes.
The Surface Pro 6 lasted about 4 hours less at 9:20 and the Dell XPS 13 with Core i7 and 4K display mustered 8:53. The Qualcomm-powered Galaxy Book 2 came closest to the iPad with 10:41.
The new iPad Pro's sheer speed is undeniable. In fact, if I were Apple, I would be finding ways to bring this chip over to the Mac. But keep in mind that performance is just one consideration when deciding between the iPad Pro and a more traditional PC.
If you prefer a desktop interface, the Surface Pro 6 is the better choice, and it also offers a better keyboard with touchpad and built-in kickstand. But if you can see yourself working within iOS, the iPad Pro should make quick work of whatever you need to do.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
I’m sure as long as there’s a glowing apple logo, every struggling college kid will be displaying it at the nearest Starbucks.
I didn't see anywhere in the article anything about processor speed, the # of cores in the processor (multi-tasking), the clock speed of RAM, nor the transfer rate to long-term storage. In other words I read a lot of sizzle and no substance.
I guess sizzle is all that's needed to sell Apple products.
How about having a f*& ing headphone jack? Did the tests measure that?
If you prefer a desktop interface, the Surface Pro 6 is the better choice, and it also offers a better keyboard with touchpad and built-in kickstand. But if you can see yourself working within iOS, the iPad Pro should make quick work of whatever you need to do.
It's for watching those adorable videos on You Tube and surfing the web, not serious work. At least that's the way this non techie reads it.
“When Apple introduced the new iPad Pro, the company boasted that its slim slate is more powerful than 92 percent of PCs out there. Now that we’ve benchmarked the 12.9-inch iPad Pro for our review over at Laptop Mag, it looks like that claim could very well be legit.”
This is impressive for Apple but mostly a meaningless statement even from Tom’s List. 92% of PCs are outdated or discount PCs. An 8th generation Intel Core I5 laptop typically benchmarks in the 13,000 range using Geekbench 4. We bought two of them last year for $600 a piece from Costco with 17” touchscreens and discreet GPU’s.
Apple isn’t talking about ditching intel chips in their laptop and desktops for nothing...
It is an apples to oranges comparison.
How about having a f*& ing headphone jack? Did the tests measure that?
******************************************
And I bet the damn things don’t have a floppy disc drive. I’ll find out when mine is delivered this Wednesday. ;-).
New iPad Pro 2018 12.9-inch Review
By Mark Spoonauer, Laptop Magazine, November 5, 2018
Apple likes to say that the iPad Pro is a computer, not a tablet. I beg to differ. But it is much more than a tablet.
Whatever you want to call it, the 12.9-inch iPad Pro (from $999; $1,327 with keyboard and Apple Pencil) is the most powerful mobile device ever made. The A12X Bionic processor in this slate runs circles around even Core i7-powered laptops on certain tasks, and yet the device weighs just 1.4 pounds.
Apple has given the iPad Pro an iPhone X-style makeover as well, complete with a full-screen design, Face ID and a gesture-based interface (meaning no more Home button). And the new Apple Pencil feels better in your hand while offering useful gestures. Oh, and the battery life is bonkers, at well over 13 hours.
But the iPad Pro is not a laptop replacement, at least not for me. However, if you like the idea of interacting primarily via touch or Pencil, you'll be floored by the sheer performance and versatility of this … well, you be the judge.
Price and Availability
The 12.9-inch iPad Pro starts at $999 for the Wi-Fi model with 64GB of storage. The $129 Apple Pencil and $199 keyboard bring the price to a fairly steep $1,327. That's MacBook Pro territory. Adding LTE costs $250, getting you the Wi-Fi + Cellular model.
If I were spending my own money, I would pay a little bit more and get the 256GB version, which would bring the total cost with the accessories to $1,477. For our review, Apple sent us the 1TB Wi-Fi + Cellular model, which starts at $1,899 for just the tablet and costs $2,227 when you throw in the Pencil and keyboard. Gulp.
Design
The 12.9-inch iPad Pro is still imposing, but now that's because of a much more immersive display and not because of the device's sheer footprint. Apple blasted away the big bezels from the previous model to deliver something that's almost all screen.
Apple ditched the Home button while stretching the Liquid Retina display to the corners using the same techniques (such as pixel masking) the company employed on the iPhone XR. This is not an iPhone writ large, though, as the aluminum iPad Pro's design is less playful and more industrial-chic, with perfectly flat sides and gently rounded corners.
Apple blasted away the big bezels from the previous model to deliver something that's almost all screen.
This slate is smaller in every dimension than the last iPad Pro, as well as lighter. The new iPad Pro 12.9 measures 11 x 8.4 x 0.23 inches and weighs 1.39 pounds (1.4 pounds for the LTE model), compared to the 12 x 8.7 x 0.27-inch design on the 2017 model, which also weighed a heftier 1.49 (Wi-Fi) to 1.53 pounds (Wi-Fi + Cellular).
The Surface Pro 6 is narrower than the iPad Pro but taller and thicker, at 11.5 x 7.9 x 0.33 inches, and heavier, at 1.7 pounds. In my hands, the new iPad Pro felt wonderfully thin, but you'll definitely notice its weight after a few minutes.
This slate is really best for using in your lap, whether you're drawing or typing. But it's fine for use in short stints while you're standing.
The other big (and overdue) design change on the iPad Pro 12.9 is the USB-C port, which enables users to connect the tablet to an external monitor (up to 5K), digital cameras and other devices. Some users will lament that the headphone jack got zapped as well, but many of us have already moved on to wireless headphones, anyway.
Overall, I like the design of the iPad Pro, but I wish Apple had included a kickstand like the Surface Pro 6 and Galaxy Book 2 have.
Display
It would be a total waste of $999 (or more) to use the iPad Pro 12.9 just for bingeing Netflix, but damn does this screen look good. I streamed Ugly Delicious, a show about food, and this panel made a brick oven look mesmerizing. It looked so good I had to pause the frame when it showed the rich orange flames and oozy pizza cheese up close.
According to our lab tests, the iPad Pro averages 484 nits of brightness, which beats scores from both the Surface Pro 6 (408 nits) and Samsung Galaxy Book 2 (350 nits).
This LCD can reproduce 128.4 percent of the sRGB color gamut and registered a Delta-E color-accuracy score of 0.29 (0 is perfect). The Galaxy Book 2's OLED display is more colorful, reaching 200.2 percent of sRGB, but it's not as accurate (0.31), while the Surface Pro 6 produced slightly more colors than the iPad (136 percent) but with worse accuracy (0.56).
MORE: Apple Reveals New MacBook Air, iPad Pro and Mac mini
The display on the iPad Pro 12.9 benefits from other technologies as well, such as ProMotion. This enables the panel to scale its refresh rate automatically up to 120 Hz, depending on the task. There's also True Tone, which can change the color temperature of the display based on ambient lighting to make reading easier on the eyes.
Audio
Whoa. That's what I said to myself when I listened to Bruno Mars' "Perm" blasting through the iPad Pro's four-speaker audio system. Compared to what you get from the Surface Pro 6, the new iPad's sound wasn't just louder and clearer; the bass guitar and bottom end overall were just more present on the Apple slate.
The iPad Pro also includes five microphones, which come in handy for FaceTime calls but also Siri queries. In fact, the iPad Pro heard me from several feet away in a conference room when I said, "Hey, Siri," and asked about the weather.
Apple Pencil
The new Apple Pencil is now pricier, at $129, but it's a big improvement over the original. For starters, it's a cinch to dock this Pencil with the iPad Pro, thanks to a built-in magnet. The Pencil starts charging as soon as it attaches.
I tried shaking the iPad Pro hard with the Pencil attached, and it didn't come loose. The Pencil also stayed put after I walked a mile with the iPad Pro stuffed in my backpack, but it did come loose one time while I was taking the tablet out of my bag.
The new Apple Pencil also feels better in the hand, as there's a flat edge. Plus, you can activate various shortcuts with a double tap, such as quickly pulling up the eraser. And with a quick tap, you can go straight into the Notes app when the iPad Pro's screen is off.
The new Apple Pencil is now pricier, at $129, but it's a big improvement over the original.
I handed the new iPad Pro to our deputy director of photography, Jef Castro, who also happens to be a great illustrator, and here's what he said: "My favorite update, as simple as it may sound, is the flat edge, which felt much better in my hand and made for a better grip. I say this as someone who gets minor hand cramps from the previous Pencil after continuous use."
Jef also liked all the improvements, from the magnetic charging to the double tap, which created a much smoother experience for him. Unfortunately, the Apple Pencil works with only the new iPad Pros; it's not backward-compatible with previous iPad Pros.
A12X Bionic: Crazy-fast performance
The 7-nanometer A12X Bionic chip inside the iPad Pro is so fast we almost did a spit take when we tested the CPU in our labs. This processor packs four performance cores and four high-efficiency cores, and there's a new GPU that promises twice the graphics performance as the A10X processor inside the last iPad Pro provided.
On Geekbench 4, which measures overall performance, the iPad Pro 12.9-inch turned in a multicore score of 17,995, which smokes scores from the Surface Pro 6 with its Core i5 CPU (13,025) and even the Core i7-powered Dell XPS 13 (14,180).
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 850-powered Galaxy Book 2 (3,945) is not even in the same universe as the iPad Pro.
The 12.9-inch iPad Pro also crushed the competition when we turned to video editing.
Transcoding a 4K clip to 1080p in the Adobe Rush app took just 7 minutes and 47 seconds on the iPad Pro, while the Dell XPS 13 took 31:03 and the Surface Pro 6 took 31:54. The latest 2018 13-inch MacBook Pro completed the task in 25:53.
The gap wasn't as great when we exported 100 raw photos in Adobe Lightroom on the iPad Pro, but Apple's tablet still came out on top.
The iPad Pro took 59 seconds, while the XPS 13 took a little more than 2 minutes. The 13-inch MacBook Pro and Surface Pro 6 were in the middle, at 1:35 and 1:36, respectively.
All of that A12X horsepower also comes in handy when using AR apps like Plantale. My colleagues were floored when I placed a big sunflower in the middle of the newsroom, and then the app let me zoom in on a highly detailed cross section of a leaf to see the photosynthesis process. Apps like this can change the face of education.
This iPad has serious game, too, as I found when I fought as Superman in Injustice 2. This resource-intensive title loaded in less than 10 seconds, and the action never stuttered, even on a giant, 12.9-inch display as I frantically punched and kicked.
MORE: New iPad Pro Beats XPS 13, MacBook Pro in Leaked Benchmarks
However, that game isn't even fully optimized for the iPad Pro. Assassin's Creed Identity and a new version of NBA 2K19 both look impressive, but we'll have to see if those and other titles are really Xbox One S-quality, as Apple claims.
Battery Life
This is impressive. On the Laptop Mag Battery Test, the iPad Pro 12.9 inch lasted 13 hours and 14 minutes. That beats the Surface Pro's time (9:20) by nearly 4 hours. The ARM-powered Galaxy Book 2 mustered a good-but-not-great 10:41.
Despite the inclusion of USB-C, the iPad Pro 12.9 inch doesn't offer fast charging. We will update this review with full test results, but this slate took about an hour to charge to 20 percent.
My biggest gripe with the iPad Pro is the short, 1-meter power cable. It didn't even reach to my kitchen table from a very close wall. Apple sells a 2-meter USB-C cable for $19, but that accessory should have been included.
iOS 12Using the iPad Pro in iOS 12 feels a lot more intuitive and productive than you might think. This is not just a big iPhone. You can easily run two apps side by side, provided they're optimized for the software. For example, I could easily drag an image out of Photos into an outgoing message I had composed in Mail.
My biggest gripe with the iPad Pro is the short power cable.
If you swipe up from the bottom of the screen, you can close an app, but swiping up slightly will show the Dock. Swiping down from the top right will display the Control Center, for tweaking settings on the fly. You can also quickly switch between open apps just by swiping from left to right toward the bottom of the screen.
However, I think the keyboard integration with iOS should be better. For example, you can't just type on the Home screen to search for apps. You have to swipe down from the top of the screen first. It's a similar deal for the Settings menu. You shouldn't have to tap the Search bar first when you have the keyboard attached.
Cameras
You will look silly using a 12.9-inch tablet to take photos and videos, but you'll be glad to know that the 12-MP camera on the iPad's back takes sharp pics.
And this camera uses the same smart HDR feature as the latest iPhones have to bring out more highlights.
Take this photo of mums, for example. The iPad Pro delivered fairly good detail in the petal, and the pinks and yellows were rich without being overly saturated.
The iPad Pro also did a good job capturing this scene in Bryant Park. The holiday lights are fairly distinct, though the trees in the background could be a little sharper.
The front 7-MP camera on the iPad Pro can take Portraits, complete with the ability to tweak the depth control for a nice bokeh effect (after you shoot but not before). But for some reason, Apple didn't give the back camera Portrait mode support.
Bottom Line
The iPad Pro is the quintessential tablet for power users and creative pros. It's so fast that I imagine the likes of Qualcomm and Intel are getting nervous. This tablet wiped the floor with premium Windows laptops and 2-in-1s, in both benchmarks and real-world tests. The iPad Pro's display, sound and battery life are also top-notch, and the improved Apple Pencil is more comfortable and easier to store.
However, it's going to take some time for developers to tap the potential of the A12X Bionic chip. For instance, a fully optimized version of Photoshop for the iPad is shipping in 2019, complete with Apple Pencil and touch support -- not a watered-down Photoshop, but the real deal.
If you're looking for a true laptop replacement, the Surface Pro 6 is a better option. It's not as speedy, but Microsoft's 2-in-1 offers a more comfortable keyboard with a touchpad and a true desktop environment.
Then again, Apple didn't set out to create a 2-in-1. The company wanted to deliver the ultimate mobile device for those who like the idea of using touch and Pencil input most of the time. And if you're in that target audience, nothing comes close to the iPad Pro.
Credit: Laptop Mag
FR does NOT have advertising———enough!
.
There’s a version of Vusual Studio for Mac. Part of the Xamarin acquisition.
All you've done is show you've fallen into the hype of negative information about iOS.
I would not use an iOS device to program, develop databases, etc. . . but they are capable of doing so.
Spamming isn’t going to make this “news” sound any more like news.
The fact is, my 3 year old machine does 14,696 on the G4 benchmark, and your shiny new Apple only does 17,995. That’s it. Not very impressive at all.
The latest Intel processors exceed 40,000.
Benchmarks run the same tasks on all machines they benchmark. They don't run specific tasks but stress the processors and graphics capabilities to see what they are capable of doing. You don't test specific productivity apps, you run the standardized benchmark apps, which hit the hardware, to see how fast specific tasks can be accomplished by that hardware.
Macs will still run macOS, not iOS. macOS is fully capable of running on Apple’s A-series processors. I expect the transition to start by 2020 at the latest for many reasons, not least of which Intel technology is lagging.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
