[UCANSEE2]

Is the information valuable, regardless to whether there is actually a “Q” or not ?

[Responsibility2nd]

Is the information valuable, regardless to whether there is actually a “Q” or not ?

____________________________________________________

THAT is the $64,000 question. And the answer is NO.

There has been nothing of any substance that these Q posts have resulted in. In fact - they are wrong on most “predictions”. Lucky guesses on the rest.

[ArcadeQuarters]

Even if the people behind it had inside information, it’s too vague to be useful.

[bagster]

Is the information valuable,

Yes.

[_Jim]

re: “Is the information valuable, regardless to whether there is actually a “Q” or not ?”

The question is, in that stream of ‘intel’, when does it stop being “valuable” and start being mis-info ... that happens w/o notice, BTW.

[FreeReign]

Is the information valuable, regardless to whether there is actually a “Q” or not ?

Q is one part research, one part self-serving misinformation and zero parts inside information.

If one can do their own research, why would one want to wade through the self-serving misinformation?