re: “Is the information valuable, regardless to whether there is actually a “Q” or not ?”
The question is, in that stream of ‘intel’, when does it stop being “valuable” and start being mis-info ... that happens w/o notice, BTW.
There's plenty of "misinfo" mixed in. That was explained and has to be understood.
Nobody believes EVERY word that Q utters. In fact, most of the "info" comes in the form of a question. The "info" is researched, guessed at, and dot-connected.
Lots of times we get it wrong.
We understand that Q is also talking to the derps to gauge their reaction.
“when does it stop being “valuable” and start being mis-info”
Remember, Q said “disinformation is necessary”. Apparently, any time one of his (their) predictions is wrong, that must be the “disinformation”. Which tends to happen quite a lot.
So just believe everything he says, until you find out later he was wrong, and then stop believing it because it was “disinformation”.
Hope that clears things up.