Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese warship in 'unsafe' encounter with US destroyer, amid rising US-China tensions
CNN ^ | 1:21 PM ET, Mon October 1, 2018 | Barbara Starr and Ryan Browne,

Posted on 10/01/2018 12:12:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin

A US Navy ship had an "unsafe" interaction with a Chinese warship Sunday while the US vessel was conducting a freedom of navigation operation near the disputed Spratly Islands in the South China Sea, causing the US ship to maneuver "to prevent a collision," according to US defense officials.

"A (People's Republic of China) Luyang destroyer approached USS Decatur in an unsafe and unprofessional maneuver in the vicinity of Gaven Reef in the South China Sea," Capt. Charles Brown, a spokesman for US Pacific Fleet, told CNN in a statement confirming the incident.

Brown said the Chinese warship "conducted a series of increasingly aggressive maneuvers accompanied by warnings for the Decatur to depart the area."

He added that the Chinese destroyer "approached within 45 yards" of the front of the US ship, adding that the Decatur "maneuvered to prevent a collision."

"Our forces will continue to fly, sail and operate anywhere international law allows," he said.

This incident comes amid heightened US-China tensions over a broad range of issues. Chinese ships often shadow US vessels during freedom of navigation operations but those interactions are usually considered safe.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: china; internationalwaters; navy; redchina; spratlyislands; usn; ussdecatur
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: outofsalt

How much of that technology did they get from SpyFi and the Clintons?


What ever they could and from mainland Chinese working in various corporations, research centers and the like.

There’s a story about a trade show decades ago where some vendor was showing off some new material, the ingredients which he had in liquid form in various trays.

Along came a Chinese guy and chatted hin up, while that was going on the Chinese guy leaned over to get a better look at something on the table, his tie ‘accidentally’ fell into on of the liquid trays.

On leaving the booth, he immediately bagged his tie, and on returning to his hotel, boxed and shipped the tie off to mainland China for analysis.

So it all isn’t stealing, but a lot is clever trade-craft in places an venues one would least expect. All of these items, and so on, are part of Project 863 in China - the search for the next super-weapon (like the A-bomb was to WWII).


21 posted on 10/01/2018 1:47:41 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4jQhnXrWbg

OK, not a Krivak, looks like one of the early gas turbine ASW corvettes.


22 posted on 10/01/2018 1:51:12 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave
"The only way the Chinese can destroy anything is with a Kamikaze move"

I want to beat my chest and agree with you but I seem to remember some old story about Slick Willie and some shared missile technology.

23 posted on 10/01/2018 1:54:04 PM PDT by buckalfa (I was so much older then, but I'am younger than that now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Comdr. Ho Li Phuc and Lcdr. Bim Bop Ow in command of Chinese destroyer.


24 posted on 10/01/2018 2:51:24 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie ("The MSM is the enemy of the American people"...Democrat Pat Caddell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
"with such a provocative act by the Chinese"

The provocative act was the US ship being in the 12 mile territorial waters. The Chinese boat forced the US boat out of Chinese waters.

This is a US violation of the Law of the Sea Treaty to which China is a party and the US is not a party to the treaty. The only 5 nations not a party are the US, Turkey, Syria, Israel, and Iran.

The GOP has blocked both GW Bush and Obama efforts to ratify the treaty saying that the US has the worlds most powerful navy and can establish their own law of force.

25 posted on 10/01/2018 3:17:47 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: donozark

Wasn’t he the pilot who buzzed our Orion p-3 back in 2001? the Chinese have a way of running into our equipment.


26 posted on 10/01/2018 5:04:16 PM PDT by jmcenanly ("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

Yes


27 posted on 10/01/2018 5:41:48 PM PDT by donozark (There are no flamingos in Venezuela.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Read the other day that the guns on the Iowa battleships were disabled. They also haven’t been sealed & air conditioned to prevent corrosion. That stands to reason as the vessels are museum ships open to the public. The Iowa’s are not coming back.


28 posted on 10/01/2018 6:29:10 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Pity.
The Missouri had missile firing equipment fixed on board when the Gipper brought them back briefly.
I guess the age of BBs is truly over.
29 posted on 10/01/2018 6:34:59 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
It is refreshing to have one our ships change course for a change.

They didn't have a female OOD who would have cried during the encounter.

30 posted on 10/02/2018 5:14:11 AM PDT by politicianslie (OPTIMIST-Glass 1/2 full- PESSIMIST 1/2 empty TO ENGINEER, Glass is twice as big as it needs to be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Apparent photo of the very close encounter between the Chinese destroyer and US destroyer in the south China sea a few days ago. Looks aggressive enough!


31 posted on 10/03/2018 9:18:49 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Apparent photo of the very close encounter between the Chinese destroyer and US destroyer in the south China sea a few days ago. Looks aggressive enough!


32 posted on 10/03/2018 9:18:50 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Who took that pic?


33 posted on 10/03/2018 11:50:30 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: politicianslie

Yeah. It makes my stomach hurt.


34 posted on 10/03/2018 2:00:03 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin; BenLurkin; RinaseaofDs
Ben Ficklin: "The provocative act was the US ship being in the 12 mile territorial waters.
The Chinese boat forced the US boat out of Chinese waters. "

Rubbish.
Gaven & Johnson reefs are in the Spratly Islands claimed by not only China but also Vietnam, the Philippines & Taiwan, near waters also claimed by Brunei and Malaysia.

The US and other nations recognize the South China Sea as international waters and conduct "freedom of navigation" operations there.
Chinese military aggression in international waters is a very dangerous "game".

Map of South China Sea claims:

35 posted on 10/03/2018 4:15:07 PM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

Are you a NeoCon?


36 posted on 10/04/2018 7:51:31 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Seems like just a perfect ‘oops, didn’t think it was loaded’ incident with a forward gun.


37 posted on 10/04/2018 7:54:39 AM PDT by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson