Posted on 09/29/2018 11:43:27 AM PDT by bolobaby
All,
I haven't posted here in a long while, many because I was pissed about JimRob's handling of the primaries. But that aside...
When it comes to Kavanaugh, it is extremely important that we have our ducks in a row. If we make specious claims (as Ford has!), then we will be able to be debunked, and as Blumenthal AMAZINGLY said, "False in one thing, false in everything." Yes... I too can't believe Mr. Lies-About-Vietnam had the nerve to say that, but for rubes out there who WANT to believe Ford, this statement holds some weight.
Start by watching this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RD6m-cyUI_g
Take note that the important concept here is RELEVANT questions, not TOTAL questions. So, while hooked up to the polygraph machine, you are asked a slew of questions, but the universe of RELEVANT questions should be quite small. The fact is that the RELEVANT question needs to shock and surprise the examinee as to generate a physiological response in they are lying. The more you lie, the more your body "calms down" and starts messing with the results.
Now go look at the polygraph report that was provided by Ford's lawyers:
https://www.scribd.com/document/389531392/Ford-Polygraph-Result
Take note that the report specifically refers to RELEVANT questions, which is important parlance for polygraph examiners. Anyone in the profession will understand that the limited number of RELEVANT questions actually improves polygraph accuracy. This report does not indicate the number of questions used to baseline.
Refer to section 5 of this document to understand the different kind of questions Ford was asked during the polygraph examination:
https://antipolygraph.org/documents/federal-polygraph-handbook-01-12-1998.pdf
As you can see, there is a variety of question types, and we should in no way assume that the examiner mentioned that they followed a methodology in their report, mentioned the relevant questions, but then they abandoned the remainder of the methodology regarding additional question types.
Bottom line: The left has A LOT of useful idiots on their side in this debacle. These useful idiots are willing to believe ANYTHING their side says without ANY corroboration or basis in fact. DO NOT BE A USEFUL IDIOT AND REPEAT THE TWO POLYGRAPH LIE.
Ford believes what she is saying. So what? There are many people who believe outlandish things, especially when it comes to reconstructed memories for 36 years ago. If you want red meat regarding this matter, look at how she came into the memories of these "events."
I cannot understand the contradiction: Cruz must go, but RINO's however can only be opposed in the primaries.
I suppose the answer is that there are two factions here on the forum. Perhaps the issue of voting for the lesser of two evils is a rational decision, but the hatred for Cruz is irrational and emotional?
Any correction and contradiction is greatly appreciated!
Here’s the polygraph guy himself. He states there were two questions asked while she was hooked up to the machine.
You see they could have used that as a chess piece, give us the full results, audio, video report of polygraph and we will go with the FBI investigation. NO, their lawyers said no, and we didn’t enforce that demand. They know we will cave and move on, they know how to fight like a pit bull.
But knowing them, they would have stalled and the rino’s would still have refused to vote for him without the FBI. This is where we suck.
Why didn’t Kav have his lawyer next to him helping, saying were not going to answer that, helping the Judge? Was it his own decision to do it alone? It was a bad idea. Lawyer could have said asked and answered or guided him on his replies regarding drinking, passing out, black outs.
Will the FBI interrogate the person who did the pplygraph? Or is this investigation just all on Kav or not her?
Agree. I was a Cruz supporter too. But NOBODY except DJT could have survived the 99% media assault 100% of the time as Trump did, and still does, relentlessly.
I am not all upset this weekend. Trump is going to win this one too!
People should stop watching TV news including FOX. OAN okay.
OH, I was not for Cruz, but we need him to win in November.
Vote people, and stop the crying.
The FBI will talk to the “examiner,” but remember who paid his bills. He won’t say anything to incriminate his clients or Ford. The DNC wouldn’t take a chance on somebody they couldn’t trust. So far, we’ve seen one witness and one statement that wasn’t paid for by the DNC, that would be Kavanaugh’s testimony and his statement.
He explains that it was only two questions because she was “the victim”.
...”The polygraph was performed at the airport hotel where she was returning home from attending her grandmother’s funeral. Between admitted flight anxiety and death of a family member, what medications was she taking?”...
It was provided and paid for by her lawyers who sent that person to her from some distance on the day of that funeral, a really odd and strange deal. And, we are chastised to think this was a left-wing conspiracy. In my opinion, that is exactly what it was and is.
AND SHE SAID SHE CRIED A LOT.
From a meme:
Ford: “I kept crying during the polygraph”
That would create false positives, degrading the accuracy and reliability from 70-90% to less than 20% Yet, she still ‘PASSED”??????
If this is true it should be headline on Drudge.
The outcome of the polygraph is not the only problem. She took a polygraph that has no legal standing whatsoever, publicized it, before she formally submitted anything to the Judiciary Committee. That’s telling right there. She was trying to try Kavanaugh in the press as much as possible and avoid taking any legal action of any kind.
just curious, did you get a response to your direct question over an hour ago?
Only your query.
Whinging about your butthurt from two years ago will not win you any friends or sympathy, pal.
No one wants to hear your repressed memories of what the mean ol' Freepers did to you way back when, and how you're still traumatized about it.
Send it in a letter to Diane Feinstein.
Provide a link to even one post where any Freeper has called for Cruz's defeat in November, or retract that slander.
If you call a Freeper out by name, you're supposed to ping them to your post.
Flake caves because he is at heart a Democrat.
“Cruz still gets dumped on, daily, on FR, even now... including calls for him to be defeated in NOV.”
I think you’re confused. Name even one FReeper who’d rather have Beto win instead of Cruz.
I’ve heard that a more reliable method of detecting lying is analyzing a subject’s voice. It would be cool to have one of those investigators evaluate Dr. Fraud’s testimony and weigh in on it.
Of course, whatever drug she was on could impact those results, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.