Posted on 09/11/2018 8:57:50 AM PDT by JonnyFive
A leaked email chain has revealed that senior executives at Google attempted to rig the 2016 US presidential election for Hillary Clinton.
In the emails, a Google executive describes efforts to pay for free rides for a certain sect of the population to the pollsa get-out-the-vote for Hispanic voters operationand how these efforts were because she thought it would help Hillary Clinton win the general election in 2016, according to Breitbart.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
Note this site is appearing as untrusted on my browser
It appears untrusted by FReepers also.
Later this afternoon, Google’s attorney will say that the “curiously worded” announcement really meant that they were conspiring to PREVENT colluding with Democrats to make sure BJ’s wife won.
(Fauxnews has since removed “curiously worded” from the article)
Major FEC violation. Google should be fined Millions and be regulated. But that will never happen..
Yes they need to be regulated.
One hundred million dead by the heavy hand of government during the last century was not nearly enough.
And she STILL LOST :)
think that was my fault as a copied the link wrong. try this one:
http://nnettle.com/news/5035-google-attempted-to-rig-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton-email-chain-reveals
“Note this site is appearing as untrusted on my browser”
If you’re using Google Chrome then this should be of no surprise to you that they don’t want you to see information that documents Democrat Collusion and illegal campaign donations.
Palemoon
enter the URL as https://http://www.freerepublic.com/ instead of http://www.freerepublic.com/ and the trusted warning will go away.
Millions in fines would be laughably insignificant. Google had ~$110 BILLION in revenue last year.
They didn’t ‘attempt to’ rig the election... they DID rig the election.
The attempt to get her elected failed, but their rigging was real, not ‘attempted’.
bkmk
I’m using an Android (Google) tablet with the Firefox browser.
If I enter the word, ‘President’, it STILL suggests ‘Obama’ in the word choice field.
I suspect it will never be updated to suggest ‘Trump’.
Has Robert Muellar noticed the “collusion” between obama and clinton and google and twitter and near every other media company?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.