Posted on 09/04/2018 9:47:42 PM PDT by JME_FAN
The cash cow #Qanon is over. pic.twitter.com/opU3kDpdik— Ginger McQueen (@GingerMcQueen) September 5, 2018
PART 1
#QAnon hoax starter exposed by @JackPosobiec pic.twitter.com/a8ghv9pXsx— IH8SESSIONS OBI ❌ (@ObiWanKEKobi) September 5, 2018
PART 2
Part 2... pic.twitter.com/9IkAEq99sK— IH8SESSIONS OBI ❌ (@ObiWanKEKobi) September 5, 2018
Uh huh.
That may be, but I still never read it. But you go head on.
I did read Playboy, though. For the articles.
Bagster
“Please prove your assertion. Site your evidence.”
“Trust Sessions. “ That’s all I need to hear from Q to know that this a fraud!!! Sessions is the greatest traitor since Benedict Arnold.
I don’t believe there are 50k sealed indictments.
Post a primary source link listing them.
“I did read Playboy, though. For the articles.”
Playboy...likens to STAG magazine, the undressed version.
Whether Q is fake or not, it is wrong to assert that those who believe him won’t vote in November.
Whatever happens, the WWG1WGA movement is POLITICAL, drawing in massive amounts of supporters, who will most definitely vote Republican.
Read the Great Awakening subreddit. Support grows daily. These aren’t wooly-heads. They’re activists.
Big Uns had good articles too.
Bagster
If the pranksters have been outed, why are we still getting Q posts? Why don’t they show us a post before it is posted to prove who they are? They can’t because they do not have the access codes to the board.
https://twitter.com/UNIRockTV/status/1037187556478091264
At some point, you will be forced to admit being
deceived. Chat Logs cannot be screwed with.
The entire scheme, as it was planed and executed, is laid bare.
A second guy citing the same source material in the form of a screen cap from the first "source" is not a second source.
I didn't see chat logs, I saw text on a screen. There is no independently verifiable evidence that the text being displayed is a genuine chat log created on the purported date.
Q may or may not be a LARP, I'm not convinced one way or the other, but your "sources" haven't convinced me in either direction.
....except someone planned and executed a mission to blow up a Syrian airfield last weekend.
The successful mission was reported in the old media.
In-between, Q dropped some crumbs foreshadowing a mission was underway/complete.
Somehow, Q scooped all news outlets.
It was on his Twitter a month or so ago.
Scheme? Q posts info. for people to research more about it. What is the scheme here? Not asking for money neither, so thing hard to see why supposed Trump supporters are hot and heavy trying to discredit Q. Somehow Q knew McCain’s days were numbered when they were. Also posted pics no one else on the net had.
I saw posts on one of the chans, 8chan I think and they said the real Q hadn’t posted since April and that someone else had taken over who was now posting lots of memes and links to news stories. I forget if it was 8chan/pol or 8chan/greatawakening or some other channel but it was the official channel of Q after 4chan became compromised. I’ll have to see if I can find it.
Please explain why you think that chat logs cannot be falsified.
“Q makes sense if there are 50k sealed indictments. There are 50k sealed indictments. Hold on to your butts in October.”
Ummm...they don’t subtract the ones that get unsealed from the list. You know that, right?
This report seems shallow and unprovable.
If Q is fake, why so much effort to discredit by media (40+stories) and useful idiots such as those who post these articles??
You realize that you just dissed all conservatives and accused them of doing what we clearly saw liberals doing as late as yesterday with their anger.
I appreciate you posting this. Will watch l8er.
I’ve known it was a larp for a long time. Just the “Q tippitty top secret (DOE) clearance” should have clued people in lol. Then the Hillary-arrested-wearing-ankle-monitor thing, and “NK controlled by the CIA, where the CIA is developing rogue nukes blah blah,” I mean, who is dumb enough to believe that crap? Gitmo, secret military tribunals...etc.
Then they call you “deep state” or antiTrump or pedophile supporter if you point out the blatent flaws...and good old bagster posting 100 times to shout people down...
Anyway, thanks for posting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.