|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted on 08/21/2018 9:46:21 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Threadreader ImperatorRex A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Article Sundance Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Thread Martin Geddes WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
“Pay Attention” Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
It's my read, and seems to be Q's, that NATIONAL EMERGENCY changes everything, in addition to a scrutiny of the EO's Q cited.
#NotALawyer
#BetTrumpAndQKnowAFew
Bagster
Fox and Friends.
I hear a rustling in the bushes.
Bagster
@realDonaldTrumpNO COLLUSION - RIGGED WITCH HUNT!
Enjoy the show anyway. I think lawyer and non-lawyer are in for surprises.
I've expressed before, including cites to SCOTUS precedent, why military tribunals are unlikely to play against US citizens - at leasst the ones we tend to have our eyeballs on, like the ones who perpetrated the unjust exoneration of crooked Hillary and the false witness against Trump.
But, as far as I can tell, false belief is fairly harmless. The show is going to go on, properly, and not at the audience's direction.
Similar with the 45,000 sealed indictments. I'm a turd in the punchbowl. But even combing that with my view that military tribunals aren't in the cards, I think the players and venues are going to be spectacular.
Did President Trump commit a crime?
Then why not report these payments?
Can you stand here today and say the President has never lied to the American people?
how you intend to kind of respond both protectively and offensively to the crisis that you're now in?
does the President feel betrayed by Michael Cohen? And is he concerned about what he might say to Robert Mueller?
Rudy Giuliani is not a taxpayer-funded spokesperson for the President. You are.
SANDERS: I'm aware of that.
bbb
From snowybear’s link:
““NATIONAL EMERGENCY: (as defined in Black’s Law Dictionary) A state of national crisis; a situation demanding immediate and extraordinary national or federal action. Congress has made little or no distinction between a “state of national emergency” and a “state of war”. Brown v. Bernstein, D.C.Pa., 49 F.Supp. 728, 732.””
And since we are in a ‘state of war’, then there can be unlawful combatants, subject to military tribunals, correct?
(Who was the freeQer who was researching the unlawful combatants; I wanted to include them in my ping, but couldn’t recall who it was)
]20 pages[
Unredacted.
(FISA)
Or the next IG report we’ve all been waiting for.
Que Shock and Awe if either validate this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/98yduw/connnecting_some_dots/
That’s my guess for upcoming reveals.
Then your prediction for RR can proceed if that’s what the 20 redacted FISA pages, or the IG report, suggest should be done.
Or, the President could tease us that Sessions has “convinced” him that the DOJ has been most productive in the investigations that he told the DOJ to conduct, and that some interesting declassification is underway.
I will be disappointed if it is just more “Sessions Fault” rants and pointing out double standards, and highlighting what we *here* already know, but the stage may not yet be set, or the timing not right, or “stopping the government” won’t take place until after the midterms.
But I can wait.
I hear finely ground justice is a slow process.
You could very well be correct as the idiot media’s apparatchik narrative changes when RR tomorrow gets escorted out to the street carrying his desk belongings in a cardboard box, and Mueller’s top cover would be gone with it.
Mueller would have to report to somebody else at the DOJ and that responsibility would fall to the 3rd or possibly the 4th in charge since Rachel Brand resigned as number 3.
The next in charge may not be a crazy Deep State Dembot trying to overturn the last presidential election - Herr Mueller gets terminated in a timely fashion.
All year I’ve predicted that RR would be gone by December or January, but Trump could move that up by 4 months and before the mid-terms. The lame stream Media’s celebration over Manafort and Cohen would turn like a Crazy Ivan to insane squealing.
They could not contain themselves everyday chanting impeach 45!
They are planning to impeach Trump anyways so why not now start the process to clear them out now at the DOJ? A big incentive for Trump voters to go to the polls to keep the crazy Dems from taking over the House. A good gambit by Trump.
Anonymous 08/23/18 (Thu) 05:55:13 eec536 (10) No.2710527>>2710509
Yup, keep eyes on the global chess match for the key to victory against the global powers in play.. Sometimes it's extremely US-centric in discussion here (everyone's eager for the hammer to drop, of course, but patience is key), but this is a war against evil players spans across the globe.. AUS fag brought up an article earlier regarding the climate in AUS being ripe for a sweep of their globalist leader Turnbull.
>What you SEE is 2%.
>The WAR is REAL.
There are military tribunals underway every day, and some against "unlawful combatants."
The combination that is approximately forbidden by the civilian courts is US citizens in military court. The only way around that is to disable the civilian courts, and even the Civil War didn't go that far.
Not that civilian courts couldn't be shut down or circumvented, but that condition would take or be a radical change from status quo.
The rhetoric in the case you cited is a distinction by Congress. The branch that defends the civilian courts is the civilian courts. IOW, the distinction we look for is not one that Congress does or does not make, it is one that the courts make or do not make.
If national emergency is a trigger to shut down the civilian courts, then why are the civilian courts still open?
Ya, me too. My patience is vast.
I do get the feeling a BOOM is required in the face of this fake hysteria by the media, as they spend their last bullets (and all at once).
Really? Stormy Daniels? That's IT?
Ha.
Good luck proving he used campaign money for the payoff, which is the only possible crime I can see.
It's funny to watch the derps do their victory dance and to know they got nothin'.
Trump is fixing to flip the script, even if he does have to move up the timeline. FISA [20] is a good prediction, but I think [RR]is ripe. They can't tie him to this current crisis except as a diversion of media attention, but they would do that anyway. And that's just words.
The Donald will have to dump some of the [RR] dirt. The dirt we all know about. I expect he will. Maybe just today the dirt and firing after it percolates a bit? And words are wind.
The Donald will have to dump some of the [RR] dirt. The dirt we all know about. I expect he will. Maybe just today the dirt and firing after it percolates a bit?
I'm gonna hold on to my [RR] theory for another, oh, half an hour or so. Haha.
Bagster
If what you way is true, then Q is either mistaken, lying, or a Larp.
I will have to side with Q on this one.
Bagster
Pearls and all that.
Brown v. Bernstein, 49 F. Supp. 728 (1943)
The case was brought by a the government, against a person who flouted regulations pertaining to the rationing of meat during WWII.
Prentiss M. Brown, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, has filed in this court his complaint against the above-named defendant, alleging violation of a governmental meat restriction order and praying that the defendant be enjoined and restrained from further violation thereof.
My first impression is that this case has defendant attacking an administrative regulation as being outside the scope of power Congress granted the administrative agency.
The case is worth a read. It discusses balance of powers between Congress and the President, and in particular the power of the president to declare a state of emergency.
I would point out that this case was heard and decided by a civilian court, not a military tribunal. And that even though the civilian court took judicial notice ...
This court takes judicial notice that a state of war exists. [citations omitted] We are at war with the most dangerous military powers on earth. The safety and welfare of our citizens and the success of our armed forces at home and abroad depend upon the proper control of our resources.
Perhaps it is a complicated business.
I wish I had captured an argument an anon was making a few days ago about how in national emergencies, military lawyers could be put in place to assist civilian courts in navigating matters involving national security complications.
I sooooo hope your prediction comes true.....
The talking heads’ meltdown would be epic!
Said another way, either I or Q is mistaken, lying, or a Larp. (and larp won't apply to I)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
